108<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>to the Futuresoil compaction and a change <strong>in</strong> waterretention. <strong>The</strong> latter <strong>in</strong>cludes the capacity<strong>of</strong> soil to absorb water dur<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>fallevents; release water dur<strong>in</strong>g the first day(s)after a ra<strong>in</strong>fall to groundwater and streamsto reach field capacity; and reta<strong>in</strong> water attensions that are appropriate for plants totake up water (Figure 3).<strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> compaction on these propertiesvary with soil type, but can be approximatedby relat<strong>in</strong>g the actual bulk density(mass per unit volume) to a reference valuethat can be estimated from the soil texture(and which depends on sand, silt, clay andorganic matter content) on the basis <strong>of</strong>large datasets for agricultural soils (Wöstenet al. 1998). As a first estimate, we mayexpect topsoils under natural forest to havea bulk density (BD) <strong>of</strong> about 70 percent <strong>of</strong>this reference value, while severely compactedsoils may reach 1.3 times the referencevalue (BDref).Averaged over the 10 ma<strong>in</strong> soil groupsrepresented <strong>in</strong> the database <strong>of</strong> Suprayogoet al. (2003), the decrease <strong>in</strong> water-hold<strong>in</strong>gcapacity from a natural forest to along-term agriculturally used soil will be0.136 cm 3 cm –3 , equivalent to the abilityto temporarily store up to about 25 mm <strong>of</strong>ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong> 20 cm <strong>of</strong> topsoil. This is storagecapacity that can be re-used <strong>in</strong> a ra<strong>in</strong> eventon the next day, as the water will by thenhave found its way to streams and rivers(or deep groundwater stores, if these arenot yet saturated). Upon further degradationfrom agricultural to degraded lands,a further 0.081 cm 3 cm –3 (or the ability toabsorb 15 mm <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fall) can be lost. Thisloss <strong>of</strong> storage capacity is likely to <strong>in</strong>duceoverland flow conditions that can lead t<strong>of</strong>lash floods and erosion.<strong>The</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> plant-available water ow<strong>in</strong>gto soil compaction is small relative to thepF = log(—matric potential)7.06.05.04.0Permanentwilt<strong>in</strong>gpo<strong>in</strong>tPlantavailableSoilQ3.0flowField capacity2.0(dra<strong>in</strong>age dependent)1.0Saturation0.00.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6Volumetric water content cm 3 cm —3Figure 3. <strong>The</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> the soil–water retention curve are the total water contentat saturation, the amount reta<strong>in</strong>ed one day after heavy ra<strong>in</strong> (field capacity), and thepermanent wilt<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t. Soil compaction primarily affects the soil close to saturation; thecapacity for soil quick-flow (SoilQflow) or <strong>in</strong>terflow depends on the difference betweenfield capacity and saturated soil water content.loss <strong>of</strong> temporary storage capacity. <strong>The</strong>consequences <strong>of</strong> soil compaction for thepathways <strong>of</strong> excess water flows (overland,subsurface lateral flow or deep groundwaterpathways) are thus likely to be morepronounced than those for plant-wateravailability on site.Compaction can, however, negatively affectthe aeration <strong>of</strong> plant root systems, anda value <strong>of</strong> air-filled porosity at field capacity(numerically equal to the soil quickflowcapacity) <strong>of</strong> 0.1 is <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>in</strong>terpreted asa critical threshold for sensitive crops.A relatively simple method to visualizeand analyse changes <strong>in</strong> soil macroporosityl<strong>in</strong>ked to land cover makes use <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>filtration<strong>of</strong> a dye (Figure 4). <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>filtrationpatterns can be <strong>in</strong>terpreted on the basis <strong>of</strong>the general macroporosity <strong>of</strong> the soil andspecific impacts <strong>of</strong> cracks, old root channelsand activity <strong>of</strong> earthworms or othersoil biota.Soil compaction can be rapid; bulldozers,cars, animal hooves and people can allapply sufficient pressure to compact a soil,especially when the latter is wet. In the absence<strong>of</strong> soil cover, detachment <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>e soilparticles and a process called ‘slump<strong>in</strong>g’also has the same effect. <strong>The</strong> reverse process,creation <strong>of</strong> macroporosity, is slow; itprimarily depends on the activities <strong>of</strong> earthwormsand similar ‘eng<strong>in</strong>eers’ and the turnover<strong>of</strong> woody roots. Once a soil is severelycompacted, the recovery process maytake decades or up to a century. Soil tillageis a poor substitute for biological structureformation: its effects are short-lived and bydestroy<strong>in</strong>g biological structures it <strong>in</strong> factcreates an addictive effect – once tillagestops, the soil structure generally degradesrapidly. Strategic tillage-like <strong>in</strong>terventions,such as plant<strong>in</strong>g holes or crust break<strong>in</strong>gcan, however, set a long-term biologicalsoil recovery process <strong>in</strong> motion.Physical soil degradation can also have itsprimary effect via the reduction <strong>of</strong> the potentialsurface <strong>in</strong>filtration rate, through theformation <strong>of</strong> crusts on the soil surface. Inrelatively dry climates this may even be theprimary effect that leads to overland flow
Chapter 12: Watershed functions <strong>in</strong> productive agricultural landscapes109Depth (cm)Depth (cm)ForestMultistrata c<strong>of</strong>feema<strong>in</strong> processes are captured <strong>in</strong> simulationmodels that have reached considerablepredictive ability, the dynamics <strong>of</strong> soilstructure <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> decay and recoveryare still largely a black box, constra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gfurther precision <strong>of</strong> models <strong>of</strong> water balancefor example. <strong>The</strong> WaNuLCAS model(van Noordwijk et al. 2004c) uses theempirical reference value for bulk density,BDref , as a ‘fall-back’ value to which soilstructure decay reverts <strong>in</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong>specific macropore creation activities,which create macropores directly (vanNoordwijk et al. 2004d). This model descriptionsuggests that the most importantparts <strong>of</strong> a tree for land rehabilitation are thedead leaves that it sheds and the f<strong>in</strong>e andcoarse root turnover it <strong>in</strong>duces.Simple shade c<strong>of</strong>fee<strong>in</strong> conditions where the soil rema<strong>in</strong>s farfrom saturated. <strong>Where</strong> surface phenomenasuch as crust<strong>in</strong>g rather than soil compactiondom<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>in</strong> the soil physical degradationprocess, recovery may be faster: anytype <strong>of</strong> mulch that protects the soil fromthe direct impact <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong> and sunsh<strong>in</strong>e andthat stimulates soil biological activity maylead to recovery <strong>in</strong> a timeframe <strong>of</strong> months.Sun c<strong>of</strong>feeFigure 4. Infiltration patterns for a dye that leaves a dark trace <strong>in</strong> all macropores it passesthrough. This simulates what may happen dur<strong>in</strong>g heavy ra<strong>in</strong>fall on four types <strong>of</strong> land use<strong>in</strong> the Sumberjaya benchmark area <strong>in</strong> West Lampung, Indonesia; see Hairiah et al. (2004)and Widianto et al. (2004) for details on the methods and sites.It is thus important to correctly diagnosewhat type <strong>of</strong> degradation dom<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>in</strong> agiven location, as this will <strong>in</strong>fluence thetimeframe for potential recovery. Avoid<strong>in</strong>gcompaction at sites that are still <strong>in</strong> a naturalforest condition is probably more effectivethan try<strong>in</strong>g to rehabilitate degraded sites.<strong>Where</strong> surface processes dom<strong>in</strong>ate, however,rapid ga<strong>in</strong>s by mulch-based restorationactivities can be expected.Standard soil physical textbooks and handbook<strong>of</strong> methods specify how BD can bemeasured – but not how the data can be <strong>in</strong>terpreted.Bulk density is strongly related tosoil texture and soil organic matter content(which <strong>in</strong> itself depends on texture), so fora valid <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> compaction,we need to derive a reference valuefor a soil with the same texture. A simplescheme is available <strong>in</strong> spreadsheet form onwww.ICRAF.org/sea as part <strong>of</strong> the ecologicalmodels that can be freely downloaded.While the water, nutrient and carbon balance<strong>of</strong> soils are well understood, and theA further complication arises when werealize that surface litter, depend<strong>in</strong>g onits size and weight, is prone to be carriedaway by w<strong>in</strong>d or overland flow <strong>of</strong> water,lead<strong>in</strong>g to a differentiation <strong>of</strong> the land <strong>in</strong>tomutually enhanc<strong>in</strong>g zones <strong>of</strong> high <strong>in</strong>filtrationwith deposition <strong>of</strong> surface mulch,and zones <strong>of</strong> crusted soil with high run<strong>of</strong>f.Classification <strong>of</strong> litter sources by their propensityto transport is only just start<strong>in</strong>g.A macro version <strong>of</strong> the transport–depositioneffect is known as the ‘tiger bush’striped pattern <strong>in</strong> semi-arid lands – wherethe degraded zones act as water harvest<strong>in</strong>gsource areas for the vegetated parts.Land rehabilitation can aim at strategicallymodify<strong>in</strong>g the scale <strong>of</strong> this pattern, but notat a fully homogeneous state.For a full understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the trade<strong>of</strong>fsbetween productivity (or pr<strong>of</strong>itability) <strong>of</strong>land use and the implication for watershedfunctions we thus have a reasonably wellequippedtool kit. <strong>The</strong>re are complications,however, such as the differences <strong>in</strong> time
- Page 4 and 5:
CitationGarrity, D., A. Okono, M. G
- Page 6 and 7:
Enhancing Environmental ServicesCha
- Page 8 and 9:
viWorld Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 10 and 11:
viiiWorld Agroforestry into the Fut
- Page 13 and 14:
Agroforestry and the Future
- Page 15 and 16:
Keywords:Millennium Development Goa
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 21 and 22:
Trees and Markets
- Page 23 and 24:
Keywords:Dacryodes edulis, Irvingia
- Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 35 and 36:
Keywords:Perennial tree crops, plan
- Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 43 and 44:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 45 and 46:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 47:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 50 and 51:
38World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 52 and 53:
40World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 54 and 55:
“Trees influence landscape scaled
- Page 56 and 57:
44World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 58 and 59:
46World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 60 and 61:
48World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 62 and 63:
50World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 65 and 66:
Keywords:Agroforestry, improved fal
- Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 73 and 74: Keywords:Extension, farmer-centred
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 83 and 84: Keywords:Policy, land management, a
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 9Land and People:Working Gr
- Page 93: Chapter 9: Land and people81• sca
- Page 96 and 97: “Forest conservation is no longer
- Page 98 and 99: 86World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 100 and 101: 88World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 102 and 103: 90World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 104 and 105: 92World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 106 and 107: 94World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 108 and 109: 96World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 110 and 111: 98World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 112 and 113: 100World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 115 and 116: Keywords:Agroforestry, buffering wa
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 119: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 123 and 124: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 125 and 126: Keywords:Agroforestry, vulnerabilit
- Page 127 and 128: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 129 and 130: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 133: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 136 and 137: 124World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 138 and 139: 126World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 140 and 141: “Agroforestry can and does playa
- Page 142 and 143: 130World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 144 and 145: 132World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 147 and 148: Keywords:Educational impact, sustai
- Page 149 and 150: Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 151 and 152: Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 153 and 154: Keywords:Networking, research-exten
- Page 155 and 156: Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 157 and 158: Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 159 and 160: Keywords:Capacity building, agrofor
- Page 161 and 162: Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 163 and 164: Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 165 and 166: Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 167 and 168: Keywords:E-learning, agricultural e
- Page 169 and 170: Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 173 and 174:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 20Strengthening Institution
- Page 177:
Chapter 20: Strengthening instituti
- Page 180 and 181:
168“The biological characteristic
- Page 182 and 183:
170World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 184 and 185:
172World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 186 and 187:
174World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 188 and 189:
176World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 190 and 191:
178World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 192 and 193:
180World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 194 and 195:
182World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 196 and 197:
184World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 198 and 199:
186World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 200 and 201:
188World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 202 and 203:
190World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 205 and 206:
Author ContactsFahmudin Agusisri@in
- Page 207 and 208:
Acronyms and AbbreviationsACIARAFTP
- Page 210:
CreditsFront cover photo: Karen Rob
- Page 213:
World Agroforestry into the Future