13.07.2015 Views

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 5. Hatton and Williamson’s Test <strong>of</strong> Crowding OutNotes: The rates graphed are the net migrant flows over the decade divided by the average native-bornpopulation. Thus 0.08 represents an 8 percent inflow over a ten-year period or an average annualmigration rate <strong>of</strong> eight-tenths <strong>of</strong> 1 percent. The state names are indicated by a two-letter code: CT,Connecticut; IL, Illinois; IN, Indiana; MA, Massachusetts; ME, Maine; MI, Michigan; NH, NewHampshire; NJ, New Jersey; NY, New York; OH, Ohio; PA, Pennsylvania; RI, Rhode Island; and VT,Vermont. The plotted point for Wisconsin is the small dot partially hidden by the plotted observationfor New Hampshire.Source: Eldridge and Thomas 1964, Tables A1.11, A1.12, and A1.14.142In Figure 5 we present the same data that Hatton and Williamson usein their analysis. How is it that they reached their seemingly oppositeconclusion that the arrival <strong>of</strong> 100 foreigners prompted the out-migration <strong>of</strong>40 natives? We can best explain the logic <strong>of</strong> their argument by reference toFigure 6. Begin with an initial equilibrium wage in, say, the Massachusettslabor market <strong>of</strong> W 0with total employment consisting entirely <strong>of</strong> residentworkers, given by R 0. Now let there be a demand shock that shifts thedemand for labor curve out from D 0to D 1. In the absence <strong>of</strong> immigration,the wage would rise to W hand resident employment would increase toR h. Now let M foreign-born workers respond to the wage increase bymoving to Massachusetts. This shifts the supply <strong>of</strong> labor curve out to S 1,reduces the equilibrium wage to W 1,and reduces resident employment toR 1. The “crowding out” <strong>of</strong> natives that Hatton and Williamson measureis not a reduction in native employment to a level below R 0. Rather, it isthe difference between the hypothetical resident employment increase toR hand the actual employment R 1. In other words, natives and immigrantswere both moving to the same dynamic locations. As they accurately put it,“strong labour demand crowding in and foreign-born immigrant crowding

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!