13.07.2015 Views

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1950s) occurred with the Mappilas taking illegal passage on the merchantlaunches <strong>of</strong> the Arabs. One might speculate that the Islamic bond and theirmigratory tradition were the factors that led the Mappilas <strong>of</strong> Veni to takethe risk <strong>of</strong> going to an unknown country.Once they arrived, their lack <strong>of</strong> education and the illegal nature <strong>of</strong> theirentry into the society meant that most Mappila migrants obtained jobs inthe informal sector. The largest proportion <strong>of</strong> migrants from Veni (around60 percent) performed unskilled work, about 15 percent were in domesticwork and about the same number were in “business” which ranged frompetty pavement trade to the management or ownership <strong>of</strong> big supermarketsand stores. 33 Many worked illegally, without formal contracts. Some didodd jobs or filled in temporarily for other workers. Most had more thanone job at a time.Ethnic networks were even more crucial in the Middle East since theycreated community enclaves within the country which helped supporttemporarily unemployed migrants, and made it possible for newcomers totake the risk <strong>of</strong> migrating even without having prearranged jobs. Most <strong>of</strong>the migration from Veni took place as a result <strong>of</strong> relatives or friends usingtheir contacts with Arabs to arrange for jobs and visas for the prospectivemigrant.The manner in which the migrants organized the process <strong>of</strong> sending backmoney bore the distinctive stamp <strong>of</strong> the social matrix within which theywere operating. Villagers from Veni tended to join a “chitty” group (usuallycomprised <strong>of</strong> other Mappilas) soon after getting a job in the Gulf. Everymonth the members would contribute a certain amount into the chit fund,and each month one person in the group got a large sum <strong>of</strong> money (worthtwelve- to eighteen-months’ contribution). The chitty was thus a means<strong>of</strong> pooling money so that the person who was going back home for a visitcould mobilize the large sum <strong>of</strong> money he needed. This depended almostentirely on the trust between the members <strong>of</strong> the chitty group since therewas no security, and the whole system would have collapsed had even afew members defaulted.198A large part <strong>of</strong> the money earned by the villagers was sent back as “tubemoney.” This was money that was converted at the higher black market3These figures are approximations and are based on information given to me by travel agents andlocal political figures. According to the 1980 Survey <strong>of</strong> Unemployment and Housing, <strong>of</strong> the 2,340migrants from Veni at the time, 1,367 <strong>of</strong> whom had gone to Gulf countries, 11 percent were skilledworkers, 86 percent were unskilled, 2.6 percent were technical workers, and a mere 0.3 percentwere pr<strong>of</strong>essionals (Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala 1982).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!