13.07.2015 Views

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

development strategy <strong>of</strong> long-term infrastructural investment in coastalindustrialization, and such linkages are not generally found in the ruralareas to which migrants send remittances.While these studies <strong>of</strong> internal and international migration in Indiaand China concentrate on the effects <strong>of</strong> migrants’ earnings on families,communities, and surrounding regions, Manuel Orozco focuses on theeconomic contributions <strong>of</strong> remittances within a broader national context.Orozco argues that, whether used for consumption or investment,expenditures <strong>of</strong> remittances increase spending and financial flows, generatemultiplier effects in local and national markets, and contribute to economicexpansion. Further, he finds that international remittance flows tend tobe counter-cyclical in that, during global economic downturns, migrantshave continued to send or even increased the amount <strong>of</strong> remittances, thuscontributing to both their families’ and their home countries’ economicstability.352In taking a national perspective, Orozco views remittances as just one <strong>of</strong> anumber <strong>of</strong> economic activities related to international migration that affecteconomic growth. These additional activities, which he calls “the five Ts,”include transfers, telecommunications, transportation, tourism and trade.As remittances to <strong>La</strong>tin America and the Caribbean grew from $3 billionin 1980 to $45 billion in 2004, so too did the fees that transfer agencies andgovernments charged for sending migrants’ money home and converting itinto local currencies. In 2004, transfer fees ranged from under 5 percent tomore than 15 percent <strong>of</strong> the amount being sent and exchange commissionsranged from less than 1 percent to almost 40 percent. While both feesreduced the remittances to recipients in rural areas, they did contribute invarying degrees to the balance <strong>of</strong> payments and financial capital withindifferent national economies. Similarly, the telephone calls and return visitsthat migrants make back to their homeland have contributed substantialrevenues to the growth <strong>of</strong> telephone and airline companies, some <strong>of</strong> whichare based in the sending countries. Overseas migrants also comprise agrowing portion <strong>of</strong> the tourists who visit <strong>La</strong>tin American and Caribbeancountries, and their expenditures support hotels, entertainment, restaurants,and other local businesses. Finally, the demand <strong>of</strong> migrants overseas for“nostalgic” consumption <strong>of</strong> traditional foods, clothes, and other culturalgoods has stimulated the production and export <strong>of</strong> goods produced backhome. In other words, remittances account for only part <strong>of</strong> the economicactivities and growth generated by international migration. While internalmigration may not foster the same five Ts to an equal extent, it would seemthat research to determine the economic impacts <strong>of</strong> internal migration

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!