13.07.2015 Views

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

migration tend to imitate the behavior <strong>of</strong> the wealthier returnees so thatthey can also secure a higher status. Non-migrants, for their part, try theirbest to keep up.These are some <strong>of</strong> the elements <strong>of</strong> the complicated interplay <strong>of</strong> factorsthat take place in rural communities which experience a large-scaletemporary migration <strong>of</strong> predominantly lower-income migrants. In addition,arrangements to send and receive the remittances have to be made by themigrant households, and control over local economic transactions anddecisions (which the male migrant would generally have exercised hadhe been locally resident) has to be transferred to another person. Thereare thus several common processes that migrant households and migrantcommunities undergo.Differences in these common processes result from modifications whichare structured to fit the social and “cultural matrix” in which the communityis situated (Parry and Bloch1989). Veni, Cherur, and Kembu were part <strong>of</strong>the Mappila (Keralite Muslim), Ezhava (lower-caste Keralite Hindu), andSyrian Christian (upper-caste Keralite Christian) communities respectively.In addition to the fact that the emigrant communities in question practicedthree different religions, there were other fundamental differences <strong>of</strong> socialstructure and culture. Thus they differed in family and community structure,inheritance systems, gender roles, occupations, economic position, andeducational attainments, to name only the most salient <strong>of</strong> factors. It is due tothese multidimensional differences between the communities that I definethem as “ethnic” groups (see Kurien 2002). My argument in <strong>this</strong> article isthat the large scale migration to the Middle East <strong>of</strong> lower-class migrantsand their rapid enrichment brought about a reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the ethnicidentities <strong>of</strong> the three communities. Economic choices are an importantway in which personal and group identities are expressed and I willdemonstrate how the patterns <strong>of</strong> consumption, investment, and exchangeundertaken by the groups as a consequence <strong>of</strong> migration manifested as wellas shaped their ethnic structures and identities.4. The Three Economic PatternsIn <strong>this</strong> section, the three communities, each in a different geographicalregion and “Gulf pocket” <strong>of</strong> Kerala, are described and the patterns <strong>of</strong>migration from them and the manner in which the remittances from theGulf have been used by each are discussed. As mentioned above, therewere some broad similarities in the expenditure patterns <strong>of</strong> the areas. Inall cases, for example, house construction was undertaken and migrantsbrought back electronic consumer durables and clothing from the Middle195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!