13.07.2015 Views

Bring on tomorrow - AIG.com

Bring on tomorrow - AIG.com

Bring on tomorrow - AIG.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ITEM 7 / RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.....................................................................................................................................................................................Change in Retirement Plan Liabilities Adjustment..............................................................................................................................................................................................The decrease in 2011 was primarily due to the announced redesign and resulting remeasurement of the <strong>AIG</strong>Retirement and <strong>AIG</strong> Excess Plans, which was c<strong>on</strong>verted to cash balance plans effective April 1, 2012. <strong>AIG</strong>recognized a $590 milli<strong>on</strong> pre-tax reducti<strong>on</strong> to Accumulated other <strong>com</strong>prehensive in<strong>com</strong>e in c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> with theremeasurement in 2011, primarily due to a decrease in the discount rate since December 31, 2010. This decrease inAccumulated other <strong>com</strong>prehensive in<strong>com</strong>e was partially offset by the effect of the increase in the discount rate in thefourth quarter of 2011 in c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> with the year end remeasurement.Change Attributable to Divestitures and Dec<strong>on</strong>solidati<strong>on</strong>s..............................................................................................................................................................................................The change attributable to divestitures and dec<strong>on</strong>solidati<strong>on</strong>s in both periods reflect the derecogniti<strong>on</strong> of all items inAccumulated other <strong>com</strong>prehensive in<strong>com</strong>e (loss) at the point of sale and dec<strong>on</strong>solidati<strong>on</strong> for all entities, includingdomestic entities. In 2011, the most significant entities were <strong>AIG</strong> Star, <strong>AIG</strong> Edis<strong>on</strong> and Nan Shan. In 2010, the mostsignificant entities were AIA and ALICO.Deferred Taxes <strong>on</strong> Other Comprehensive In<strong>com</strong>e..............................................................................................................................................................................................As discussed above, for the year ended December 31, 2011, the effective tax rate differs from the statutory35 percent rate primarily due to the effects of the Nan Shan dispositi<strong>on</strong>.For the year ended December 31, 2010, the effective tax rate <strong>on</strong> pre-tax Other Comprehensive In<strong>com</strong>e was42.5 percent, primarily due to the effects of the AIA initial public offering, the ALICO dispositi<strong>on</strong> and changes in theestimated U.S. tax liability with respect to the potential sale of subsidiaries, including <strong>AIG</strong> Star and <strong>AIG</strong> Edis<strong>on</strong>...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................<strong>AIG</strong> 2012 Form 10-K 119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!