13.07.2015 Views

Bring on tomorrow - AIG.com

Bring on tomorrow - AIG.com

Bring on tomorrow - AIG.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ITEM 7 / CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES.....................................................................................................................................................................................Class of Business Loss Cost Trend Loss Development FactorPrimary Workers’ Compensati<strong>on</strong>The loss cost trend assumpti<strong>on</strong> is not believed to Generally, our actual historical workers’be material with respect to our loss reserves. This <strong>com</strong>pensati<strong>on</strong> loss development factors would beis primarily because our actuaries are generally expected to provide a reas<strong>on</strong>ably accurateable to use loss development projecti<strong>on</strong>s for all predictor of future loss development. However,but the most recent accident year’s reserves, so workers’ <strong>com</strong>pensati<strong>on</strong> is a l<strong>on</strong>g-tail class ofthere is limited need to rely <strong>on</strong> loss cost trend business, and our business reflects a veryassumpti<strong>on</strong>s for primary workers’ <strong>com</strong>pensati<strong>on</strong> significant volume of losses, particularly in recentbusiness.accident years. After evaluating the actualhistorical loss development since the 1980s forthis business, in our judgment, it is reas<strong>on</strong>ablylikely that actual loss development factors will fallwithin the range of approximately 3.1 percentbelow to 6.9 percent above those actually utilizedin the year-end 2012 loss reserve review......................................................................................................................................................................................................................Excess Workers’ Compensati<strong>on</strong>Loss costs were trended at six percent per Excess workers’ <strong>com</strong>pensati<strong>on</strong> is an extremelyannum. After reviewing actual industry loss trends l<strong>on</strong>g-tail class of business, with a much greaterfor the past ten years, in our judgment, it is than normal uncertainty as to the appropriate lossreas<strong>on</strong>ably likely that actual loss cost trends development factors for the tail of the lossapplicable to the year-end 2012 loss reserve development. After evaluating the historical lossreview for excess workers’ <strong>com</strong>pensati<strong>on</strong> will development factors for prior accident years sincerange five percent lower or higher than this the 1980s as well as the development over theestimated loss trend.past several years of the ground up claimprojecti<strong>on</strong>s utilized to help select the lossdevelopment factors in the tail for this class ofbusiness, in our judgment, it is reas<strong>on</strong>ably likelythat actual loss development for excess workers’<strong>com</strong>pensati<strong>on</strong> could increase the current reservesby up to approximately $1.3 billi<strong>on</strong> or decreasethem by approximately $850 milli<strong>on</strong>........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................188 <strong>AIG</strong> 2012 Form 10-K

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!