13.07.2015 Views

Bring on tomorrow - AIG.com

Bring on tomorrow - AIG.com

Bring on tomorrow - AIG.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ITEM 7 / CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES.....................................................................................................................................................................................Class of Business or Category and Actuarial MethodApplicati<strong>on</strong> of Actuarial MethodGeneral LiabilityWe generally use a <strong>com</strong>binati<strong>on</strong> of loss development methods For certain classes of business with sufficient loss volume,and expected loss ratio methods for primary general liability or loss development methods may be given significant weight forproducts liability classes. We also supplement the standard all but the most recent <strong>on</strong>e or two accident years. For smalleractuarial techniques by using evaluati<strong>on</strong>s of the ultimateor more volatile classes of business, loss developmentlosses <strong>on</strong> unusual claims or claim accumulati<strong>on</strong>s by external methods may be given limited weight for the five or moreexperts <strong>on</strong> those classes of claims. The segmentati<strong>on</strong> of the most recent accident years. Expected loss ratio methods aredata reflects state differences, industry classes, deductible/ used for the more recent accident years for these classes.n<strong>on</strong>-deductible programs and type of claim.The loss experience for primary general liability business isgenerally reviewed at a level that is believed to provide themost appropriate data for reserve analysis. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally,certain sub-classes, such as c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, are generallyreviewed separately from business in other subclasses. Dueto the fairly l<strong>on</strong>g-tail nature of general liability business, andthe many subclasses that are reviewed individually, there isless credibility given to the reported losses and increasedreliance <strong>on</strong> expected loss ratio methods for recent accidentyears......................................................................................................................................................................................................................Commercial Automobile LiabilityWe generally use loss development methods for all but the Expected loss ratio methods are generally given significantmost recent accident year for <strong>com</strong>mercial automobile classes weight <strong>on</strong>ly in the most recent accident year.of business......................................................................................................................................................................................................................HealthcareWe generally use a <strong>com</strong>binati<strong>on</strong> of loss development methods The largest <strong>com</strong>p<strong>on</strong>ent of the healthcare business c<strong>on</strong>sists ofand expected loss ratio methods for healthcare classes of coverage written for hospitals and other healthcare facilities.business.We test reserves for excess coverage separately from thosefor primary coverage. For primary coverages, lossFrequency/severity methods are sometimes used for pricingdevelopment methods are generally given the majority of thecertain healthcare accounts or business. However, in testingweight for all but the latest three accident years, and areloss reserves the business is generally <strong>com</strong>bined into largergiven some weight for all years other than the latest accidentgroupings to enhance the credibility of the loss experience.year. For excess coverages, expected loss methods areWe also supplement the standard actuarial techniques bygenerally given all the weight for the latest three accidentusing evaluati<strong>on</strong>s of the ultimate losses <strong>on</strong> unusual claims by years, and are also given c<strong>on</strong>siderable weight for accidentexperts <strong>on</strong> those classes of claims.years prior to the latest three years. For other classes ofhealthcare coverage, an analogous weighting between lossdevelopment and expected loss ratio methods is used. Theweights assigned to each method are those that are believedto result in the best <strong>com</strong>binati<strong>on</strong> of resp<strong>on</strong>siveness andcredibility........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................182 <strong>AIG</strong> 2012 Form 10-K

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!