13.07.2015 Views

Bring on tomorrow - AIG.com

Bring on tomorrow - AIG.com

Bring on tomorrow - AIG.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ITEM 7 / RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.....................................................................................................................................................................................2012 and 2011 Comparis<strong>on</strong><strong>AIG</strong> Property Casualty ResultsOperating in<strong>com</strong>e increased in 2012, primarily due to a decrease in catastrophe losses to $2.7 billi<strong>on</strong> from$3.3 billi<strong>on</strong> in the prior year. In additi<strong>on</strong>, net investment in<strong>com</strong>e increased due to asset diversificati<strong>on</strong>, fromc<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> in tax-exempt municipal instruments into investments in private placement debt and structuredsecurities. This was slightly offset by an increase in acquisiti<strong>on</strong> costs due to the change in business mix to highervalue lines of business and the change in business mix from Commercial Insurance to C<strong>on</strong>sumer Insurance. Generaloperating expenses increased due to the c<strong>on</strong>tinued investment in strategic initiatives and human resources, as aresult of <strong>AIG</strong>’s c<strong>on</strong>tinued investment in its employees. For the year ended December 31, 2012, investments instrategic initiatives totaled approximately $455 milli<strong>on</strong>, representing an increase of approximately $233 milli<strong>on</strong> overthe prior year. In additi<strong>on</strong>, bad debt expense increased by approximately $143 milli<strong>on</strong> from the prior year. Net prioryear adverse development, including premium adjustments, was $445 milli<strong>on</strong> for 2012 <strong>com</strong>pared to $39 milli<strong>on</strong> for2011.Commercial Insurance ResultsOperating in<strong>com</strong>e decreased in 2012, primarily due to a decrease in allocated net investment in<strong>com</strong>e reflecting adecrease in the risk-free rate. Underwriting losses increased slightly <strong>com</strong>pared to the prior year, reflecting lowercatastrophe and improved current accident year losses, the effect of rate increases and enhanced risk selecti<strong>on</strong>, andan increase in reserve discount of $100 milli<strong>on</strong>, offset by higher acquisiti<strong>on</strong> and general operating expenses, andhigher adverse prior year development.Acquisiti<strong>on</strong> costs increased primarily as a result of higher <strong>com</strong>missi<strong>on</strong> expense due to the restructuring of the U.S.Casualty, primarily loss-sensitive business, as we move towards higher value lines. General operating expensesincreased due to an increase in bad debt expense of approximately $143 milli<strong>on</strong> and investments in strategicinitiatives.C<strong>on</strong>sumer Insurance ResultsC<strong>on</strong>sumer Insurance generated operating in<strong>com</strong>e in 2012 <strong>com</strong>pared to an operating loss in 2011, reflecting areducti<strong>on</strong> in underwriting loss as well as an increase in allocated net investment in<strong>com</strong>e resulting primarily from thestrategic group benefits partnership with <strong>AIG</strong> Life and Retirement. Underwriting results improved due to the<strong>com</strong>binati<strong>on</strong> of lower catastrophe losses, favorable loss reserve development, the effect of rate increases, enhancedrisk selecti<strong>on</strong> and portfolio management. These improvements were offset in part by higher acquisiti<strong>on</strong> and generaloperating expenses.Acquisiti<strong>on</strong> costs increased primarily due to an increase in warranty profit sharing arrangements, increasedinvestment in direct marketing, and a decrease of approximately $49 milli<strong>on</strong> in the benefit from the amortizati<strong>on</strong> ofVOBA liabilities recognized at the time of the Fuji acquisiti<strong>on</strong>. General operating expenses increased in 2012 due toinvestments in infrastructure and strategic expansi<strong>on</strong> in growth ec<strong>on</strong>omy nati<strong>on</strong>s.2011 and 2010 Comparis<strong>on</strong><strong>AIG</strong> Property Casualty ResultsWe recognized operating in<strong>com</strong>e in 2011 <strong>com</strong>pared to an operating loss in 2010 primarily due to an increase inpremium revenues, partially offset by higher acquisiti<strong>on</strong> and general operating expenses. Prior year adverse lossdevelopment, net of premium adjustments, decreased from $4.8 billi<strong>on</strong> in 2010 to $39 milli<strong>on</strong> in 2011. Catastrophelosses were $3.3 billi<strong>on</strong> in 2011 <strong>com</strong>pared to $1.1 billi<strong>on</strong> in 2010.Acquisiti<strong>on</strong> and general operating expenses increased in 2011, primarily due to the effect of including Fuji results fora full year. General operating expenses also increased due to investments in a number of strategic initiatives during2011, including the implementati<strong>on</strong> of improved regi<strong>on</strong>al governance and risk management capabilities, theimplementati<strong>on</strong> of global accounting and claims systems, preparati<strong>on</strong> for Solvency II and certain other legal entityrestructuring initiatives...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................76 <strong>AIG</strong> 2012 Form 10-K

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!