The Ashkenazi Revolution

168goal was always to rule. There are two sides to power: Money andrepresentation. Shin Shalom was primarily concerned with material wealthand Hazaz’s heart desired representation.When Levi Eshkol announced in that meeting: “I stand shoulder toshoulder with the Literature”, the small minds of the literary foxes -representatives of the literary gang - melted away (Mr. Avraham Kariv wasan honest and scriptural man among them, and he was the exception). Atthat point, their joy was complete because the entire purpose of the meetinghad been realized. Hebrew Literature had expelled the previous primeminister, Ben-Gurion. He never again sat on the lofty throne and a simplepioneer-worker man, who had not delved into the essence of HebrewLiterature, and was willing to offer himself for their service, inherited hisplace. There is no doubt that Mr. Eshkol, busy and exhausted with issuesand tasks, never understood the deeper meaning of that meeting, of thevictorious joy of the literary foxes, and of their intentions to receive a freshstamp of approval for their charter of conquest, whose foundations hadbeen shaken by the words of Ben-Gurion.In his book “In One Chain”, Haim Hazaz continues the tradition that wasalways typical for the New Hebrew Literature. What I mean is the bellycrawlingof this literature to a tree that they had previously sought touproot, and then, after it grew nicely, to crawl toward it like a parasiticsnake, in order to benefit from its fruit. The New Hebrew Literaturerejected the Lovers of Zion, and then later grabbed its money andinstitutions. Next, it abused and rejected Herzl and, at the Congress, whenhe had succeeded, it knew how to take advantage for its own benefit, morethan anything else, of the monies and institutions of the Zionist Agency.Hebrew Literature mocked the State, but when it was founded, it wasamong the first to line up for its funds. Haim Hazaz, regarding theRevisionist Underground, had now revealed this parasitic diligence, whichwas developed over generations. This matter of the Underground has beenattracting more and more public attention. The shameful role that HebrewLiterature played in this matter is recognizable to any honest person, and itcripples the activities of the Literary Trust. Hazaz attempts to patch this