The Ashkenazi Revolution

226their numerical strength in the population continued to decrease. Due toeconomic and technical development, the positions of responsibility thatwere given to the Arabs of Algeria in industry, in the lower levels ofmilitary command, in administration and so on, continued to increase.Skilled young Algerians found themselves in French universities. Thus didthe intellectual class, which instigated the rebellion, take shape, attainindependence, and utterly eliminate French settlement in Algeria. Francehad given the Arabs of Algeria all the tools needed to defeat it. She made itpossible for them to multiply and reduce the European settlement to aminority that numbered only ten percent. She promoted the growth of theirintelligentsia. She granted them the French language, which became, intheir hands, a powerful tool that connected them to the modern world andto modern concepts… the French war against the Algerian rebels was, inessence, a war against itself, that is to say, against the results of priorFrench policies, and its defeat in this war was clear from the start.This “Algerian situation” was created, according to Ben Haroush and hisfriends, also in the State of Israel and among the tasks of the Sephardo-Mizrahim is to intensify it through a series of Wadi Salib actions, whoseresult will be similar to the Algerian Arab revolt. Ben Haroush is tooprimitive to spread this doctrine among the Sephardic leaders. He basedhis doctrine upon his deeds, and after him came intellectuals andideologues, who interpreted them into thoughtful interpretations. Theversion that prevails today, among the Sephardic leaders, is the “Algerianversion”, which believes an overwhelming Sephardo-Mizrahi majority willsweep aside the Ashkenazi minority just as happened to the Europeanminority in Algeria. In the present situation, the Sephardic leaders see anearly stage in which the Sephardo-Mizrahi camp must prepare, acquireeducation and knowledge, attain status for itself and weaken the status ofthe Ashkenazi enemy. There is much truth in this grasp of the leaders ofSepharad, but it suffers from two weaknesses. The situation in Israel isdifferent from the situation in Algeria in that the French Algerians hadsomewhere to go, but the Ashkenazi Israeli has nowhere to flee to.Secondly, and this is the main point, the zealotry of the French is nothingcompared to the zealotry of the Ashkenazim. Ashkenaz will never give up,