The Ashkenazi Revolution

198take long to show. The sacrifice of the Ashkenazi People came in threestages, through the use of undemocratic methods and through hidden,underground, tactics. The first stage came to fruition in the New HebrewLiterature, which undermined the status of Yiddish, the democraticlanguage of the masses, sought to make determinations, in the lot of thepeople, through a language that they did not understand, and through anetwork of secret underground cells, of which the main one was “The Sonsof Moses”, the underground organization of Ahad ha’Am. The secondphase of the sacrifice of the Ashkenazi People was carried out at the SixthZionist Congress, when the British government proposal of establishing aJewish state in East Africa was rejected. This time also they useddespicable tactics, in the form of pressuring the ailing Herzl, and bybreaking the democratic spirit of the true representatives of the AshkenaziPeople through a well-organized underground group of its rivals. The thirdphase of the fatal process was carried out when the people of the secondmigration decided “to bake a small loaf” with their settlements in TurkishPalestine, as the president of the state, Mr. Shazar, said in his book “Lightof Men” page 310. Reducing the size of the small loaf does no harm ifthose who are reducing it are doing their own work and refraining fromcheating other people. But the people of the second migration did their bestto place the policies of Ashkenazi People under the microscope of theirestablishment. In their use of tactics such as deception, slander, libel andinsults, they constantly claimed that the Ashkenazi People was of inferiorvalue, middle-men, unproductive, lacking language, lacking its own workerstatus, and that therefore it should not act as if it is important, but rather itshould shrink in order to fit into the framework of deeds and thoughts thatfit in with the “small loaf”, that was baked in the Land of Israel.This chain of intentional, and undemocratic attacks, against the AshkenaziPeople, for such a long period, is the direct cause of the tragedies that befellit in the twentieth century. This is also the reason for the shaky status ofthe Ashkenazi settlement in the State of Israel. The Ashkenazi People is abrilliant people, but its political understanding is almost infantile. It hasnot yet done an assessment that reflects the vast change that occurred in itsstatus, for its horrible defeat, which brings with it also defeat and descent in