13.07.2015 Views

Self-Esteem Research, Theory, and Practice Toward a Positive ...

Self-Esteem Research, Theory, and Practice Toward a Positive ...

Self-Esteem Research, Theory, and Practice Toward a Positive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Major <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Esteem</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Findings 75(competence <strong>and</strong> worth) rather than one, self-esteem seems important incollective cultures as well. They went on to conduct their own study withChinese participants <strong>and</strong> concluded that self-esteem, when defined thisway, is present there, too. Tafarodi <strong>and</strong> Swann Jr. concluded that theproblem of individualistic versus collectivistic self-esteem can beaccounted for by what they named a “cultural trade off.”The trade, of course, occurs in terms of whether a culture emphasizescompetence or worth (or as they said it, “self-competence” <strong>and</strong>“self-liking”). What appears to happen cross-culturally from this perspectiveis that both factors are always present, but a culture may loadself-evaluation in one direction or the other. Such a trade-off would beconsistent with the individual focus of one culture <strong>and</strong> the communalvalues of the others. Thus, in a highly individualistic culture such as ours,we would expect to see people evaluating themselves in ways that emphasizetheir competence through their successes <strong>and</strong> failures <strong>and</strong> so forth.At the same time, it would also be reasonable to expect people in a culturebuilt on communal <strong>and</strong> collective structures to focus on the value orworth of their relationships <strong>and</strong> to diminish the value of a particularperson’s role in events. Yet, such a trade-off is never complete: It is notpossible to say that self-esteem is mainly dependent on one factor in oneculture <strong>and</strong> the other in a different one. Americans, for instance, do recognizethe value <strong>and</strong> importance of conducting oneself in a worthy fashioninterpersonally <strong>and</strong> Asians know about the importance of trying todo one’s best. When seen from a two-factor perspective, what appears tobe dichotomous turns out to be matter of emphasis, not exclusion.Accordingly, the evidence seems to favor the direction of seeing selfesteemas a basic human phenomenon. In fact, we will see later in thischapter that there is good reason to suggest that self-esteem is an importantbasic human need that is cross-cultural in nature (Sheldon, Elliot,Kim & Kasser, 2001).THE SOURCES OF SELF-ESTEEMCoopersmith (1967) was one of the first to study the sources of selfesteem<strong>and</strong> found that there are four: power (the ability to influence orcontrol others), significance (being valued by others as shown by theiracceptance), virtue (the adherence to moral st<strong>and</strong>ards), <strong>and</strong> competence(a successful performance in regard to a goal). More recently, Epstein(1979) pointed out that if success is involved in self-esteem, then the possibilityof failure must be active, too. Hence, he describes four similarsources, but does so more dynamically: Achievement is balanced by loss,power is offset by powerlessness, acceptance is coupled with the possibility

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!