Self-Esteem Research, Theory, and Practice Toward a Positive ...
Self-Esteem Research, Theory, and Practice Toward a Positive ...
Self-Esteem Research, Theory, and Practice Toward a Positive ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Major <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Esteem</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Findings 75(competence <strong>and</strong> worth) rather than one, self-esteem seems important incollective cultures as well. They went on to conduct their own study withChinese participants <strong>and</strong> concluded that self-esteem, when defined thisway, is present there, too. Tafarodi <strong>and</strong> Swann Jr. concluded that theproblem of individualistic versus collectivistic self-esteem can beaccounted for by what they named a “cultural trade off.”The trade, of course, occurs in terms of whether a culture emphasizescompetence or worth (or as they said it, “self-competence” <strong>and</strong>“self-liking”). What appears to happen cross-culturally from this perspectiveis that both factors are always present, but a culture may loadself-evaluation in one direction or the other. Such a trade-off would beconsistent with the individual focus of one culture <strong>and</strong> the communalvalues of the others. Thus, in a highly individualistic culture such as ours,we would expect to see people evaluating themselves in ways that emphasizetheir competence through their successes <strong>and</strong> failures <strong>and</strong> so forth.At the same time, it would also be reasonable to expect people in a culturebuilt on communal <strong>and</strong> collective structures to focus on the value orworth of their relationships <strong>and</strong> to diminish the value of a particularperson’s role in events. Yet, such a trade-off is never complete: It is notpossible to say that self-esteem is mainly dependent on one factor in oneculture <strong>and</strong> the other in a different one. Americans, for instance, do recognizethe value <strong>and</strong> importance of conducting oneself in a worthy fashioninterpersonally <strong>and</strong> Asians know about the importance of trying todo one’s best. When seen from a two-factor perspective, what appears tobe dichotomous turns out to be matter of emphasis, not exclusion.Accordingly, the evidence seems to favor the direction of seeing selfesteemas a basic human phenomenon. In fact, we will see later in thischapter that there is good reason to suggest that self-esteem is an importantbasic human need that is cross-cultural in nature (Sheldon, Elliot,Kim & Kasser, 2001).THE SOURCES OF SELF-ESTEEMCoopersmith (1967) was one of the first to study the sources of selfesteem<strong>and</strong> found that there are four: power (the ability to influence orcontrol others), significance (being valued by others as shown by theiracceptance), virtue (the adherence to moral st<strong>and</strong>ards), <strong>and</strong> competence(a successful performance in regard to a goal). More recently, Epstein(1979) pointed out that if success is involved in self-esteem, then the possibilityof failure must be active, too. Hence, he describes four similarsources, but does so more dynamically: Achievement is balanced by loss,power is offset by powerlessness, acceptance is coupled with the possibility