13.07.2015 Views

Self-Esteem Research, Theory, and Practice Toward a Positive ...

Self-Esteem Research, Theory, and Practice Toward a Positive ...

Self-Esteem Research, Theory, and Practice Toward a Positive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Esteem</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Positive</strong> Psychology 243self-esteem work <strong>and</strong> positivistic positive psychology in these two areasas a way of making the point that there is a legitimate <strong>and</strong> importantplace for self-esteem in this new field. Using examples from both academic<strong>and</strong> applied areas such as these also illustrate the fact that selfesteemwork is important for at least two levels or dimensions ofpositivistic positive psychology.<strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Esteem</strong>, Authenticity, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Positive</strong> PsychologyWhen examining research findings in Chapter 3, we found that the fieldof self-esteem has been interested in the phenomenon of authenticity forquite some time. Positivistic positive psychology also identifies authenticityas a primary human strength <strong>and</strong> supports work in this area (Peterson& Seligman, 2004, p. 249). Much of the existing work on authenticityinvolves self-esteem, but that fact is not given much attention when thenew positive psychology makes use of this literature. In theory, perhapsthe problem with including self-esteem in positivistic positive psychologyis the idea that humanistic work on the topic does not meet the st<strong>and</strong>ardsof the naturalistic paradigm. For example, perhaps a true, inner, or“intrinsic” self, which is essential to the notion of authenticity, is far too“qualitative” of a concept to meet the traditional empirical st<strong>and</strong>ards ofthe new positive psychology.However, the fact is that contemporary work on self-esteem goeswell beyond such a limitation. A case in point is <strong>Self</strong>-Determination<strong>Theory</strong> (SDT), which operates from an explicitly existential <strong>and</strong> “organismic,”which is to say humanistic, point of view. SDT holds that thereare three most basic human needs: autonomy, competence, <strong>and</strong> relatedness.To paraphrase Ryan <strong>and</strong> Brown (2003, p. 73) this view underst<strong>and</strong>sautonomy as a combination of “volition <strong>and</strong> ownership, <strong>and</strong> initiative,”competence as the “ability to respond to challenges effectively,” <strong>and</strong>relatedness as “feelings of belonging <strong>and</strong> connectedness,” which I characterizein terms of providing a sense of acceptance or worth.Although SDT does not see self-esteem as one of the most basichuman needs, self-esteem is still regarded as an important phenomenonbecause it affects such things as self-regulation <strong>and</strong> authenticity, both ofwhich are vital to SDT. For example, if a person suffers from low, fragile,contingent, paradoxical, or unstable self-esteem, then much of selfregulationwill be defensive. Underst<strong>and</strong>ing oneself as having a poordegree of competence impairs autonomous functioning, because such aperceived deficiency makes it difficult to take the risks associated withacting on one’s own. Similarly, basing one’s sense of worth on externalrather than internal st<strong>and</strong>ards creates a condition of dependence on othersthat constrains one’s ability to function on the basis of intrinsic motivation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!