Self-Esteem Research, Theory, and Practice Toward a Positive ...
Self-Esteem Research, Theory, and Practice Toward a Positive ...
Self-Esteem Research, Theory, and Practice Toward a Positive ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Meaning-Based, Two-Factor <strong>Theory</strong> of <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Esteem</strong> 171also plenty of individual variation in what could otherwise seem like a regimentedprocess. By the end of this stage of self-esteem development, theindividual comes to have what the literature refers to as a basic or globallevel of self-esteem. Over all, then, the relationship between competence<strong>and</strong> worthiness is that of equal partners in the self-esteem: It is the “additive”result that Harter (1999) <strong>and</strong> the two-factor school in general talkabout in regard to self-esteem <strong>and</strong> in measuring it.By now, the developing child is well on the way to acquiring his orher own self-esteem type <strong>and</strong> level. The material we considered on thedevelopment of self-esteem indicates that an individual can run into threekinds of problems in this stage of self-esteem formation. First, a childmay already have encountered major obstacles or problems in the earlydevelopment of worthiness or competence. For example, such factors asearly childhood behavioral problems, learning disabilities, unsupportiveor abusive parenting, <strong>and</strong> social-economic deprivation may affect thedevelopment of self-esteem in ways that impede its movement toward apositive direction (Harter, Whitehall & Junkin, 1998). Second, the child’snatural competencies may not be relevant to the skills required for successin a given environment or the opportunities for developing suchskills may be limited, either of which could create a situation in which thechild’s chances for failure outweigh the possibilities of success. Third, thedeveloping individual may encounter a conflict of values. Those experiencesthat involve intrinsic or internalized values are helpful to the developmentof self-esteem but contingent or external values are not. Whenthe individual faces a conflict between such values or value choices, muchmore is at stake than may meet the eye (Deci & Ryan, 1995; Ryan &Deci, 2003).Various factors that help or hurt the developmental process includegenetic predispositions (Neiss, Stevenson & Sedikides, 2003), the natureof the gene/environment fit between a child <strong>and</strong> the world into which heor she is born, how observant the parent is, how caring or rejecting ateacher happens to be at a critical time, how supportive or rejecting otherchildren are, whether the child’s culture emphasizes individualistic or collectivevalues, <strong>and</strong> so on. Those who find circumstances favorable becauseof one positive factor or another move forward in their growth moreeasily, whereas those who do not, acquire the beginnings of a problematicself-esteem theme. In either case, this phase of the development of selfesteemappears to solidify during adolescence which, in turn, adds thefinal ingredients of identity <strong>and</strong> self-awareness. Although self-esteem doesseem to be somewhat open to fluctuations at the beginning of this process,the level <strong>and</strong> type of self-esteem acquired by the end of this period seem tobe the basic sense of competence <strong>and</strong> worthiness with which the individualmust begin to face the challenges of living on their own.