20.07.2015 Views

VAAM-Jahrestagung 2012 18.–21. März in Tübingen

VAAM-Jahrestagung 2012 18.–21. März in Tübingen

VAAM-Jahrestagung 2012 18.–21. März in Tübingen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

118virulence provides novel targets for drug development. CyaB is a virulenceregulat<strong>in</strong>g sensor prote<strong>in</strong> belong<strong>in</strong>g to adenylyl cyclase (AC) Class III, aprote<strong>in</strong> family form<strong>in</strong>g the second messenger cyclic adenos<strong>in</strong>e 3’,5’-monophosphate (cAMP) through conserved catalytic doma<strong>in</strong>s, which areregulated by a diverse set of fused regulatory doma<strong>in</strong>s. CyaB is furtherregulated by its N-term<strong>in</strong>al MASE2 doma<strong>in</strong>, which also acts as cellmembrane anchor [1].We describe here the biochemical and structural characterization of CyaB,and its <strong>in</strong>hibition by small molecules. The tertiary structure of CyaB showsthe same fold<strong>in</strong>g pattern, as all previously described class III ACs. CyaB<strong>in</strong>dicates subtle differences <strong>in</strong> active site and <strong>in</strong>hibitor b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g sites byus<strong>in</strong>g the AC CyaC as a template [2].Through a genetic screen, we identified several activat<strong>in</strong>g mutations, thatare <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the regulation of CyaB by the Chp virulence system, andby solv<strong>in</strong>g the crystal structure of the CyaB catalytic doma<strong>in</strong>, we canrationalize the effects of several of these mutations and suggest that CyaBemploys regulation mechanisms similar to other Class III AC, buttriggered by other stimuli. Our results reveal mechanistic <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>tophysiological and pharmacological regulation of CyaB and thus providethe basis for a better understand<strong>in</strong>g of this signall<strong>in</strong>g system and forexploit<strong>in</strong>g it for drug development.[1] Fulcher et al, Molecular Microbiology (2010) 76(4), 889-904[2] Steegborn et al, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (2005) 12(1), 32-37MPP038The role of 1-<strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>in</strong> for Yop translocation <strong>in</strong> Yers<strong>in</strong>iaenterocoliticaB. Keller* 1 , E. Deuschle 1 , B. Manncke 1 , A. Siegfried 1 , R. Fässler 2 ,I.B. Autenrieth 1 , E. Bohn 11 Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital ofTüb<strong>in</strong>gen, Tüb<strong>in</strong>gen, Germany2 Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Molecular Medic<strong>in</strong>e,Munich, GermanyYers<strong>in</strong>ia enterocolitica <strong>in</strong>jects effector prote<strong>in</strong>s (Yops) <strong>in</strong>to host cells witha Type Three Secretion System (TTSS). Injection of Yops affects severalcell functions what f<strong>in</strong>ally leads to immune evasion.Former studies us<strong>in</strong>g cultured cells showed that an <strong>in</strong>teraction of theYers<strong>in</strong>ia adhesion factors YadA and Invas<strong>in</strong> with 1-<strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>in</strong>s on the hostcell site acts as a prerequisite for Yop translocation. 1-<strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>in</strong>s aretransmembrane heterodimeric receptors which can switch between anactive and <strong>in</strong>active conformation, and trigger various signal<strong>in</strong>g cascades<strong>in</strong>side the cell. In this study we want to show whether and how 1-<strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>in</strong>mediated signal<strong>in</strong>g contributes to Yop translocation <strong>in</strong> vitro anddiscrim<strong>in</strong>ate between Inv and YadA triggered effects. For this purpose a -lactamase reporter system was used to detect and quantify Yop <strong>in</strong>jection <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>fected cells.We will present evidence that YadA and Invas<strong>in</strong> show strik<strong>in</strong>g differences howthey contribute to Yop <strong>in</strong>jection.(1) Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Yop translocation <strong>in</strong>to epithelial and fibroblastoid cells showsthat Inv triggered Yop <strong>in</strong>jection is always strictly dependent on the expressionof 1-<strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>in</strong>s and an <strong>in</strong>tact 1-cytoplasmic doma<strong>in</strong>. Thereby the 1-cytoplasmic doma<strong>in</strong> seems to be crucial as a b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g site for the adaptor tal<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terms of <strong>in</strong>side-out activation and as a l<strong>in</strong>ker to the act<strong>in</strong> cytoskeleton. But it isnot important as a transmitter for 1-<strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>in</strong> mediated outside-<strong>in</strong> signal<strong>in</strong>g bythe tyros<strong>in</strong>e k<strong>in</strong>ases FAK, SRC or ILK. So a high aff<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>in</strong>teraction betweenInv and 1-<strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong> which <strong>in</strong>side-out activation by tal<strong>in</strong> is <strong>in</strong>volved, seems tobe sufficient for Inv mediated effector translocation.(2) In contrast, only <strong>in</strong> fibroblasts but not <strong>in</strong> epithelial cells <strong>in</strong>teraction of YadAwith 1-<strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>in</strong>s is required for Yop translocation. Additionally the 1-cytoplasmic doma<strong>in</strong> is only partly important for YadA triggered Yop <strong>in</strong>jection.So depend<strong>in</strong>g on cell type 1-<strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>in</strong>s are completely dispensible for YadAmediated Yop <strong>in</strong>jection. This clearly demonstrates, that YadA can <strong>in</strong>itiate Yoptranslocation also by so far unknown 1-<strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>dependent mechanisms.MPP039Human formyl peptide receptor 2 senses and differentiatesenterococciD. Bloes* 1 , D. Kretschmer 1 , M. Otto 2 , A. Peschel 11 Interfaculty Insitute of Microbiology and Infection Medic<strong>in</strong>e, Cellular andMolecular Microbiology, Tueb<strong>in</strong>gen, Germany2 National Institute of Health, National Institute of Allergy and InfectiousDiseases, Bethesda, United StatesThe human <strong>in</strong>nate immune system counteracts bacterial <strong>in</strong>vaders bymultiple antimicrobial mechanisms <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g polymorphonuclearleukocytes (PMN), which represent the most efficient phagocytes firstoccurr<strong>in</strong>g at the site of <strong>in</strong>fection.The human formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) is a seven-transmembrane G-prote<strong>in</strong> coupled receptor and is found on various cells. Recently, we couldshow that FPR2 is crucial for recruit<strong>in</strong>g and activat<strong>in</strong>g PMN <strong>in</strong>staphylococcal <strong>in</strong>fections because it senses concentrations of the majorstaphylococcal cytolys<strong>in</strong>s phenol-soluble modul<strong>in</strong> (PSM) peptides [1].Moreover, FPR2 adjusts PMN responses with respect to PSM release andpathogenicity of staphylococcal species [2].Enterococci represent another group of important nosocomial pathogens.In this study, we show that not only staphylococci but also certa<strong>in</strong>enterococci are capable of produc<strong>in</strong>g ligands for FPR2 therebyunderscor<strong>in</strong>g the importance of this receptor <strong>in</strong> antibacterial host defense.PMN chemotaxis and <strong>in</strong>tracellular calcium <strong>in</strong>flux were <strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong> a dosedependentmanner by supernatants of Enterococcus faecalis andEnterococcus faecium. Only for E. faecium, this effect could be <strong>in</strong>hibitedby the S. aureus-derived FPR2-antagonist FLIPr. In agreement with this,calcium flux <strong>in</strong> receptor-transfected HL-60 cells showed that only E.faecium elicited a FPR2-specific response whereas E. faecalis did not.Also, vancomyc<strong>in</strong>-resistant E. faecium isolates <strong>in</strong>duced a considerablystronger response than vancomyc<strong>in</strong>-susceptible isolates. However, both E.faecium and E. faecalis activated the FPR2 paralog FPR1, which sensesbacterial formylated peptides. The enterococcal genomes do not encodepeptides with apparent similarity to PSM peptides. To further characterizethe unknown FPR2 ligands produced by E. faecium, supernatants weretreated with proteases, which completely abolished the ability to stimulateFPR2 transfected HL-60 cells. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that the unknown FPR2ligands of E. faecium represent peptides.In conclusion, we were able to demonstrate that certa<strong>in</strong> enterococciproduce peptide-derived microbial associated molecular patterns, whichare sensed by human FPR2.[1] Kretschmer et al. (2010), Human formyl peptide receptor 2 senses highly pathogenic Staphylococcusaureus. Cell Host Microbe. Jun 25;7(6):463-73.[2] Rautenberg et al. (2011), Neutrophil responses to staphylococcal pathogens and commensals via theformyl peptide receptor 2 relates to phenol-soluble modul<strong>in</strong> release and virulence. FASEB J.Apr;25(4):1254-63.MPP040Prote<strong>in</strong>-prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction with<strong>in</strong> the Cpx-two component systemK. TschaunerUniversität Osnabrück, Molekulare Mikrobiologie, Osnabrück, GermanyTwo-component signal transduction systems (TCS) are the ma<strong>in</strong>mechanisms by which bacteria sense and respond to environmental stimuli[1]. TCS typically consist of a sensor k<strong>in</strong>ase (SK) and a response regulator(RR). The SK autophosphorylates upon detect<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g cue andtransfers the phosphoryl group to its cognate RR which now promoteschanges <strong>in</strong> cellular physiology or behavior [1]. To keep the TCS <strong>in</strong>balance, the RR gets dephosphorylated <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic or due to the phosphataseactivity of the SK [1]. However, the mechanistic details about the precisesignal <strong>in</strong>tegration and transfer rema<strong>in</strong> still unknown [2].The Cpx-envelope stress system is a well established TCS composed of themembrane-bound SK CpxA, the cytosolic RR CpxR and <strong>in</strong> addition of theaccessory prote<strong>in</strong> CpxP [3]. Factors that cause cell envelope stress as e.g.pH stress, salt stress and misfolded prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>duce the Cpx-TCS [3]. Theaccessory CpxP <strong>in</strong>hibits autophosphorylation of CpxA and supports thedegradation of misfolded pilus subunits [3]. Previous functional andstructural studies suggest not only that CpxP <strong>in</strong>hibits CpxA through adirect prote<strong>in</strong>-prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction but also <strong>in</strong>dicate how CpxP act as asensor for misfolded pilus subunits, pH and salt [4]. With membrane-SPINE [5] and bacterial two-hybrid system, we were now able todemonstrate the direct physical prote<strong>in</strong>-prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction between CpxPand CpxA<strong>in</strong> vivo. Furthermore, our data show under several Cpx-<strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>gconditions that CpxP is released from CpxA assign<strong>in</strong>g CpxP as the sensorfor specific Cpx-<strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g stimuli. Release of CpxP from CpxA is assumedto result dimerization and consequently <strong>in</strong> the autophosphorylation ofCpxA [1, 3]. Thus, our comb<strong>in</strong>ed results lead to a deeper <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to thesignal recognition <strong>in</strong> TCS <strong>in</strong> general.A.M. Stock, V.L. Rob<strong>in</strong>son and P.N. Goudreau, Annu. Rev. Biochem.69(2000), p. 183.J. Cheung and W.A. Hendrickson, Curr. Op<strong>in</strong>. Microbiol.13(2010), p. 116.S. Hunke, R. Keller and V.S. Müller, FEMS Microbiol. Lett (2011) doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02436.x..X. Zhou, R. Keller, R. Volkmer, N. Krauß, P. Scheerer and S. Hunke J Biol Chem286(2011), p. 9805.V.S. Müller, P.R. Jungblut, T.F. Meyer and S. Hunke, Proteomics (2011)11, p. 2124.MPP041Comparative secretome analysis of Enterococcus faecalisisolates from food and cl<strong>in</strong>ical orig<strong>in</strong>I. Hartmann* 1 , S. Giubergia 1,2 , A. Pessione 2 , E. Pessione 2 , K. Riedel 1,31 Helmholtz Centre for Infection research, Microbial Proteomics,Braunschweig, Germany2 University of Tur<strong>in</strong>, Laboratorio di Biochimica e Proteomica deiMicrorganismi D.B.A.U, Tur<strong>in</strong>, Italy3 Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, Insitute of Microbiology,Greifswald, GermanyThe ubiquitous Gram-positive Enterococcus faecalis belongs to the groupof lactic acid bacteria and is part of the natural gut microbiota ofmammals, but is also found <strong>in</strong> a range of fermented foods, particularly <strong>in</strong>artisanal cheeses. The presence of E. faecalis <strong>in</strong> cheese can be consideredbeneficial, with its metabolic activity contribut<strong>in</strong>g to desired traits liketexture or flavour. Furthermore, probiotic effects have been attributed tothis organism. However, the widespread application of E. faecalis <strong>in</strong> starterBIOspektrum | Tagungsband <strong>2012</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!