80FUP008Asc1p’s role <strong>in</strong> MAP-k<strong>in</strong>ase and cAMP-PKA signal<strong>in</strong>gK. Schmitt*, N. Rachfall, S. Sanders, G.H. Braus, O. ValeriusGeorg-August University Gött<strong>in</strong>gen, Mol. Microbiol. & Genetics,Gött<strong>in</strong>gen, GermanyThe eukaryotic ribosomal prote<strong>in</strong> Asc1p/RACK1 is required fordevelopmental processes <strong>in</strong> lower eukaryotes (S. cerevisiae) as well as <strong>in</strong>higher eukaryotes (plants and mammals). However, there is poorknowledge about the prote<strong>in</strong>’s exact mode of action and its own posttranscriptionalregulation. We could show that S. cerevisiae Asc1p controlsthe abundance of transcription factors <strong>in</strong> yeast, namely of Ste12p, Phd1p,Tec1p, Rap1p, and Flo8p. This seems to be at least partially due to anAsc1p-dependent translational regulation of the transcription factormRNAs. We dissect Asc1p’s <strong>in</strong>fluence on the translation rates of theencod<strong>in</strong>g mRNAs from its putative <strong>in</strong>fluence on the stability of thementioned transcription factors. Tec1p-stability is regulated by the mat<strong>in</strong>gresponse pathway that targets Tec1p for degradation upon phosphorylationthrough the Fus3p-MAP-k<strong>in</strong>ase. Indeed, the pheromone response pathwayis up-regulated <strong>in</strong> the asc1 stra<strong>in</strong>. However, pathway <strong>in</strong>activation bydeletion of the FUS3 gene did not restore Tec1p levels <strong>in</strong> the asc1 stra<strong>in</strong>.Thus, Ascp1 affects Tec1p-abundance via a pheromone-<strong>in</strong>dependentmechanism. Shut-off experiments for Tec1p <strong>in</strong>dicate that deletion of ASC1has no effect on its stability suggest<strong>in</strong>g an Asc1p-dependent regulation ofTEC1-mRNA translation. We also analyze whether Asc1p itself is posttranslationallymodified (e.g. phosphorylated) through MAPk<strong>in</strong>ase/cAMP-PKApathways. Modifications of Asc1p could regulate its<strong>in</strong>teraction with other ribosomal prote<strong>in</strong>s or the formation of Asc1phomodimers[1]. Four phospho-sites of Asc1p are known from highthroughputstudies [2,3,4]. Us<strong>in</strong>g mass spectrometry we could confirm twoof these sites (S166 and T168) and furthermore determ<strong>in</strong>ed one previouslyunknown site (T72).Yatime et al. (2011). Structure of the RACK1 dimer from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Biol411, 486-498.Chi et al. (2001). Negative regulation of Gcn4 and Msn2 transcription factors by Srb10 cycl<strong>in</strong>dependentk<strong>in</strong>ase. Genes Dev 15, 1078-1092.Smolka et al. (2007). Proteome-wide identification of <strong>in</strong> vivo targets of DNA damage checkpo<strong>in</strong>tk<strong>in</strong>ases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 10364-10369.Albuquerque et al. (2008). A multidimensional chromatography technology for <strong>in</strong>-depthphosphoproteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics 7, 1389-1396.FUP009Mode of action of a cell cycle arrest<strong>in</strong>g yeast killer tox<strong>in</strong>T. Hoffmann*, J. Reiter, M.J. SchmittUniversität des Saarlandes, Molekular- und Zellbiologie, Saarbrücken,GermanyK28 is a heterodimeric A/B tox<strong>in</strong> secreted by virally <strong>in</strong>fected killer stra<strong>in</strong>sof the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. After b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g to the cell wall ofsensitive yeasts the / tox<strong>in</strong> enters cells via receptor-mediatedendocytosis and is retrogradely transported to the cytosol where itdissociates <strong>in</strong>to its subunit components. While is polyubiquit<strong>in</strong>ated andproteasomaly degraded, the -subunit enters the nucleus and causes anirreversible cell cycle arrest at the transition from G1 to S phase. K28-treated cells typically arrest with a medium-sized bud, a s<strong>in</strong>gle nucleus <strong>in</strong>the mother cell and show a pre-replicative DNA content (1n).S<strong>in</strong>ce other cell cycle arrest<strong>in</strong>g killer tox<strong>in</strong>s like zymoc<strong>in</strong> fromKluyveromyces lactis or Pichia acaciae tox<strong>in</strong> PaT cause a similar“term<strong>in</strong>al phenotype”, we tested the effect of K28 on S. cerevisiae mutantsthat are resistant aga<strong>in</strong>st those tox<strong>in</strong>s. Agar diffusion assays showed thatdeletion of TRM9 or ELP3 did not lead to tox<strong>in</strong> resistance, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g thatthe arrest caused by K28 differs from zymoc<strong>in</strong> or PaT <strong>in</strong>duced cell cyclearrest. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, RNA polymerase II deletion mutants (rpb4, rpb9)show complete resistance aga<strong>in</strong>st K28.To ga<strong>in</strong> deeper <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to the mechanism(s) of how K28 arrests the cellcycle, we further studied the <strong>in</strong>fluence of the tox<strong>in</strong> on transcription of cellcycle and G1-specific genes. Northern blot analyses showed that G1-specific CLN1 and CLN2 mRNA levels rapidly decrease after tox<strong>in</strong>treatment, though it is unclear if this decl<strong>in</strong>e is due to a direct effect.Potential tox<strong>in</strong> targets were identified <strong>in</strong> a yeast two hybrid screen andverified biochemically by coIP and GST pulldown assays. To confirm thatthe nucleus represents the compartment where <strong>in</strong> vivo toxicity occurs, weconstructed prote<strong>in</strong> fusions between K28 and mRFP and analysed their<strong>in</strong>tracellular localisation.FUP010Benzene oxygenation by Agrocybe aegerita aromaticperoxygenase (AaeAPO)A. Karich*, R. Ullrich, M. Kluge, M. HofrichterInternationales Hochschul<strong>in</strong>stitut (IHI) Zittau, Department Bio- undUmweltwissenschaften, Zittau, GermanyAgrocybe aegerita aromatic peroxygenase (AaeAPO) is an extracellularenzyme secreted by the agaric basidiomycete Agrocybe aegerita. AaeAPOhydroxylates the aromatic r<strong>in</strong>g of benzene us<strong>in</strong>g hydrogen peroxide as cosubstrate.The optimum pH for the reaction is around 7. The reactionproceeds via the primary product benzene oxide which rapidly undergoesaromatization and rearranges to phenol <strong>in</strong> aqueous solution. Existence ofbenzene oxide was proved by chemical preparation of this compound andGC/MS and LC-MS analysis. Further oxidation lead to hydroqu<strong>in</strong>one;catechol; p-benzoqu<strong>in</strong>one; o-benzoqu<strong>in</strong>one as well as 1,2,4-trihydroxybenzene and hydroxy-p-benzoqu<strong>in</strong>one. Us<strong>in</strong>g H 2 18 O 2 as cosubstratethe orig<strong>in</strong> of the oxygen transferred <strong>in</strong>to benzene and phenol wasproved to be the peroxide. The use of ascorbic acid as radical scavengerprevented dihydroxy benzenes from exchang<strong>in</strong>g oxygen with water (viaqu<strong>in</strong>ones) <strong>in</strong> this <strong>in</strong>vestigation. The apparent k cat and the approximated K M-value for benzene hydroxylation were estimated to 7.9 s -1 and 3.6 mMrespectively. Benzene oxygenation is first described here<strong>in</strong> for a hemeperoxidase.FUP011ER exit of a yeast viral A/B tox<strong>in</strong> SECrets of K28N. Mueller*, M. SchmittSaarland University, Molecular and Cellbiology, Saarbrücken, GermanyK28 is a virus encoded A/B prote<strong>in</strong> tox<strong>in</strong> secreted by the yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae that enters susceptible target cells by receptormediatedendocytosis. After retrograde transport from early endosomesthrough the secretory pathway, the / heterodimeric tox<strong>in</strong> reaches thecytosol where the cytotoxic -subunit dissociates from , subsequentlyenters the nucleus and causes cell death by block<strong>in</strong>g DNA synthesis andarrest<strong>in</strong>g cells at the G1/S boundary of the cell cycle [1].Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, K28 retrotranslocation from the ER <strong>in</strong>to the cytosol is<strong>in</strong>dependent of ubiquit<strong>in</strong>ation and does not require cellular components ofthe ER-associated prote<strong>in</strong> degradation mach<strong>in</strong>ery (ERAD). In contrast, ERexit of a cytotoxic -variant expressed <strong>in</strong> the ER lumen depends onubiquit<strong>in</strong>ation, proteasomes and ERAD components, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g (i) that amost likely masks itself as ERAD substrate and (ii) that ERretrotranslocation mechanistically differs under both scenarios [2]. Toelucidate the molecular mechanism(s) of ER-to-cytosol tox<strong>in</strong> transport <strong>in</strong>yeast as well as <strong>in</strong> mammalian cells, the major focus of the present study isto identify cellular components (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the nature of the ERtranslocation channel) <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> this process. The requirement ofproteasomal activity and ubiquit<strong>in</strong>ation to drive ER export, and theidentification of cellular K28 <strong>in</strong>teraction partners of both, the / tox<strong>in</strong> aswell as K28 are be<strong>in</strong>g analysed<strong>in</strong> vitroby us<strong>in</strong>g isolated microsomes andIP experiments.K<strong>in</strong>dly supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgeme<strong>in</strong>schaft(GRK 845).[1] Carroll et al. (2009). Dev. Cell .....[2] Heiligenste<strong>in</strong> et al. (2006). EMBO J. .....FUP012Adapt<strong>in</strong>g yeast as a model to study ric<strong>in</strong> tox<strong>in</strong> A uptake andtraffick<strong>in</strong>gB. Becker*, M. SchmittFR. 8.3 Biosciences, Molecular and Cell Biology, Saarbrücken, GermanyThe plant A/B tox<strong>in</strong> ric<strong>in</strong> represents a heterodimeric glycoprote<strong>in</strong>belong<strong>in</strong>g to the family of ribosome <strong>in</strong>activat<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong>s, RIPs. Its toxicitytowards eukaryotic cells results from the depur<strong>in</strong>ation of 28S rRNA due tothe N-glycosidic activity of ric<strong>in</strong> tox<strong>in</strong> A cha<strong>in</strong>, RTA. S<strong>in</strong>ce extention ofRTA by a mammalian-specific endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retentionsignal (KDEL) significantly <strong>in</strong>creases RTA <strong>in</strong> vivo toxicity aga<strong>in</strong>stmammalian cells, we analyzed the phenotypic effect of RTA carry<strong>in</strong>g theyeast-specific ER retention motif HDEL. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, such a tox<strong>in</strong>(RTA HDEL ) showed a similar cytotoxic effect on yeast as a correspond<strong>in</strong>gRTA KDEL variant on HeLa cells. Furthermore, we established a powerfulyeast bioassay for RTA <strong>in</strong> vivo uptake and traffick<strong>in</strong>g which is based onthe measurement of dissolved oxygen <strong>in</strong> tox<strong>in</strong>-treated spheroplast culturesof S. cerevisiae. We show that yeast spheroplasts are highly sensitiveaga<strong>in</strong>st external applied RTA and further demonstrate that its toxicity isgreatly enhanced by replac<strong>in</strong>g the C-term<strong>in</strong>al KDEL motif by HDEL.Based on the RTA resistant phenotype seen <strong>in</strong> yeast knock-out mutantsdefective <strong>in</strong> early steps of endocytosis (end3) and/or <strong>in</strong> RTA depur<strong>in</strong>ationactivity on 28S rRNA (rpl12B) we feel that the yeast-based bioassaydescribed <strong>in</strong> this study is a powerful tool to dissect <strong>in</strong>tracellular A/B tox<strong>in</strong>transport from the plasma membrane through the endosomal compartmentto the ER.Furthermore, we established a simple and sensitive fluorescence assaybased on the<strong>in</strong> vivotranslation of a GFP reporter to <strong>in</strong>vestigate <strong>in</strong>tracellularRTA traffick<strong>in</strong>g from the endosome to the yeast ER. Our results <strong>in</strong>dicatethat both, the mammalian Rab6a homologue Ypt6p, and the yeast syntax<strong>in</strong>5 homologue Sft2p are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> tox<strong>in</strong> transport from the endosome tothe TGN. In addition, the GARP complex is also important for thistraffick<strong>in</strong>g step, whereas defects <strong>in</strong> the retromer complex did not <strong>in</strong>fluenceRTA toxicity. S<strong>in</strong>ce our results uncovered strik<strong>in</strong>g similarities of tox<strong>in</strong>traffick<strong>in</strong>g between yeast and mammalian cells, we feel that our screen<strong>in</strong>gBIOspektrum | Tagungsband <strong>2012</strong>
81system represents an attractive alternative to siRNA-based screen<strong>in</strong>gsystems <strong>in</strong> mammalian cells.K<strong>in</strong>dly supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgeme<strong>in</strong>schaft.B. Becker and M.J. Schmitt (2011). Tox<strong>in</strong>s 7, 834-847.FUP013Molecular mechanism of light repression of sexual sporeformation <strong>in</strong> the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulansK. Seither*, R. FischerKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Microbiology, Karlsruhe, GermanyThe filamentous ascomycete Aspergillus nidulans is able to perceive lightdue to a repertoire of light sensors, among which is a pyhtochrome (FphA)and a flav<strong>in</strong>-conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g transcription factor (LreA) (1,2,3). Light triggersmany physiological processes and morphogenetic pathways <strong>in</strong> fungi. For<strong>in</strong>stance <strong>in</strong> Aspergillus nidulans, light <strong>in</strong>duces the development of asexualspores whereas the sexual cycle is preferred <strong>in</strong> darkness. Whereas light<strong>in</strong>ductionis studied quite well, repression of sexual genes <strong>in</strong> light has notbeen studied yet. NosA (numberof sexual spores) and NsdD (never<strong>in</strong>sexualdevelopment) are both important activators of sexual development(4,5). Both prote<strong>in</strong>s localize to the nucleus <strong>in</strong> all stages of development,which correlates with their function as putative transcription factors andthe fact that they both harbor a NLS.In order to understand the effect of light on these transcription factors,direct <strong>in</strong>teraction between them and light regulator prote<strong>in</strong>s has beenstudied. Indeed, NosA <strong>in</strong>teracted with FphA <strong>in</strong> the nucleus as shown bybimolecular fluorescence complementation. This could <strong>in</strong>dicate negativeregulation of the NosA activity. In addition, it was found that FphA b<strong>in</strong>dsto the promoters of nosA and nsdD as shown by ChIP (Chromat<strong>in</strong>-Immunoprecipitation). This suggests transcriptional control of theirexpression. LreA also bound to the promoter of nsdD, but this b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>goccurred only <strong>in</strong> light. As the expression of nsdD was lower <strong>in</strong> light than <strong>in</strong>the dark, LreA appears to repress nsdD. As NsdD and NosA are bothputative transcription factors, they also activate or repress other genes.CpeA, a catalase-peroxidase, was found to be regulated by NosA. It wasshown that NosA b<strong>in</strong>ds to the promoter of cpeA and that <strong>in</strong> the nosAstra<strong>in</strong>the expression of CpeA was drastically reduced (4). In addition, agene with a WSC-doma<strong>in</strong> and a putative FAD-dependent oxidoreductaseappeared to be regulated by NsdD.(1) Purschwitz J. et al., (2008) Curr. Biol. 18(4):255-9(2) Blumenste<strong>in</strong> A. et al., (2005) Curr. Biol. 15(20):1833-8(3) Rodriguez-Romero J. et al., (2010) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64:585-610(4) Vienken, K. & Fischer, R. (2006) Mol. Microbiol. 61:544-554(5) Han, K. et al., (2001) Mol. Microbiol. 41:299-309FUP014g1i-diagnosis: development of a stra<strong>in</strong>-specific diagnostic toolfor the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria brongniartiiA.-C. Fatu 1,2 , V. Fatu 1,2 , A.-M. Andrei 2 , C. Ciornei 3 , D. Lupastean 4 ,A. Leclerque* 11 Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Institut für Biologischen Pflanzenschutz,Darmstadt, Germany2 Research-Development Institute for Plant Protection (ICDPP),Bucharest, Romania3 Forest Research and Management Institute (ICAS), Forest ResearchStation Bacau, Bacau, Romania4 Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Forestry, Suceava, RomaniaMitosporic fungi e.g. of the genus Beauveria are of considerable economicand ecological <strong>in</strong>terest as <strong>in</strong>sect biocontrol agents. Stra<strong>in</strong>s of the speciesBeauveria brongniartii have been found particularly promis<strong>in</strong>g for thecontrol of scarabaeid pests as the European cock-chafer, Melolontha sp.,and to date several B. brongniartii formulations, e.g. “Melocont ® ”, areregistered myco<strong>in</strong>secticides. Beyond immediate control efficiencies,parameters as the persistence of fungal spores <strong>in</strong> the environment, thepossible build-up of a residual <strong>in</strong>secticidal activity, and the long-termimpact of biocontrol fungi upon ecosystem biodiversity are of relevancefor myco<strong>in</strong>secticide evaluation and registration. Therefore, diagnostic toolsfor the assessment of these parameters are highly solicited.In several mitosporic fungi <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Beauveria brongniartii, nuclearrRNA encod<strong>in</strong>g genes have previously been found <strong>in</strong>terrupted bysequences homologous to self-splic<strong>in</strong>g group 1 <strong>in</strong>trons. We have made useof the presence of these genetic elements to develop a PCR-basedapproach to stra<strong>in</strong>-specific diagnosis.With<strong>in</strong> the framework of research activities aim<strong>in</strong>g towards thedevelopment of a Melolontha biocontrol strategy based upon endemicfungal isolates from Romania, the Romanian B. brongniartii isolateICDPP#1a was genetically compared to the “Melocont” producer stra<strong>in</strong>.Amplified 18S rRNA encod<strong>in</strong>g sequences from both stra<strong>in</strong>s were found tobe 100% identical, and stra<strong>in</strong>s clustered tightly with<strong>in</strong> the B. brongniartiiclade of a phylogenetic tree reconstructed from a second, <strong>in</strong>dependentmarker, namely elongation factor 1 alpha, that is currently the marker ofchoice for the <strong>in</strong>fra-generic classification of Beauveria. However, adifference <strong>in</strong> the respective 18S rRNA gene exon-<strong>in</strong>tron structures wasdetected. Based upon this genetic difference, a PCR-based diagnostic toolwas developed that renders the two-sided positive discrim<strong>in</strong>ation and thedifferential assessment of the environmental persistence of thesebiocontrol stra<strong>in</strong>s possible.However, as several conserved <strong>in</strong>tron <strong>in</strong>sertion sites that allow for aconsiderable number of different exon-<strong>in</strong>tron structures have beenidentified throughout the 18S and 28S rRNA genes of Beauveria andrelated fungi, g1i-diagnosis clearly holds potential for application beyondthis specific context.Fatu A-C, Fatu V, Andrei A-M, Ciornei C, Lupastean D, Leclerque A (2011) Stra<strong>in</strong>-specific PCRbaseddiagnosis for Beauveria brongniartii biocontrol stra<strong>in</strong>s. IOBC/wprs Bullet<strong>in</strong> 66: 213-216.FUP015Will be presented as FUV006!FUP016Deneddylation and fungal developmentJ. Sch<strong>in</strong>ke*, M. Christmann, G. BrausGeorg August Universität Gött<strong>in</strong>gen, Mikrobiologie und Genetik,Gött<strong>in</strong>gen, GermanyDeneddylation is the removal of the ubiquit<strong>in</strong> (Ub)-like prote<strong>in</strong> Nedd8from cull<strong>in</strong>s. Cull<strong>in</strong>s are subunits of cull<strong>in</strong>-RING Ub ligases (CRL) whichare controlled <strong>in</strong> their activity and assembly/reassembly by neddylationand deneddylation. The most important eukaryotic deneddylases are theCOP9 signalosome (CSN) and the deneddylat<strong>in</strong>g enzyme 1 (DEN1).Mammalian Den1 has two functions: an isopeptidase activity remov<strong>in</strong>gNedd8 from cull<strong>in</strong>s and other prote<strong>in</strong>s and an additional l<strong>in</strong>ear peptidaseactivity process<strong>in</strong>g Nedd8 from a precursor prote<strong>in</strong>. Filamentous fungipossess an eight subunit COP9 signalosome (CSN) which is rem<strong>in</strong>iscent tothe correspond<strong>in</strong>g plant and vertebrate complex (Busch et al., 2007 PNAS104: 8089-8094; Braus et al., 2010 Curr Op<strong>in</strong> Microbiol 13: 672-676).Aspergillus nidulans requires CSN function to trigger development <strong>in</strong>response towards light, and for a coord<strong>in</strong>ated secondary metabolism(Nahlik et al., 2010 Mol Microbiol 78: 964-79). We show here thecharacterization of the fungal Den1 ortholog DenA. The denA geneencodes a cyste<strong>in</strong>e protease deneddylat<strong>in</strong>g enzyme. DenA is required forlight control and the asexual fungal development whereas CSN is requiredfor the sexual cycle. Processed Nedd8 is unable to rescue conidiaformation suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the lack of the DenA deneddylase isopeptidaseactivity is responsible for the defect. Yeast-two-hybrid experimentssuggest a physical <strong>in</strong>teraction between DenA and CSN which will befurther evaluated.FUP017Analysis of the F-box prote<strong>in</strong> encod<strong>in</strong>g genes of theopportunistic human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatusB. Joehnk* 1 , î Bayram 1 , T. He<strong>in</strong>ekamp 2 , A.A. Brakhage 2 , G.H. Braus 11 Georg-August-Universität, Department of molecular Microbiology andGenetics, Gött<strong>in</strong>gen, Germany2 Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology –HKI, Department of Molecular and Applied Microbiology, Jena, GermanyA major virulence factor for the opportunistic human pathogen Aspergillusfumigatus is its ability to rapidly adapt to host conditions dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection.The rapid response to environmental changes <strong>in</strong> the host underlies a wellbalancedsystem of production and degradation of prote<strong>in</strong>s. A highlyconserved mechanism for controlled prote<strong>in</strong> degradation is the ubiquit<strong>in</strong>proteasome-system.Ubiquit<strong>in</strong> molecules are attached to the target prote<strong>in</strong>sby the ubiquit<strong>in</strong>-prote<strong>in</strong> ligase (E3) and therefore polyubiquitnylatedprote<strong>in</strong>s are dest<strong>in</strong>ed for degradation via the 26S-proteasome. The largestgroup of E3-enzymes is the SCF Cull<strong>in</strong>1 R<strong>in</strong>g ligases (CRL), which aremultisubunit enzymes. The F-box subunit functions as a substrate adaptorand thus, is responsible for the substrate specificity of the E3 enzyme. Inthis study we have analyzed the genes, encod<strong>in</strong>g the three F-box prote<strong>in</strong>sFbx15, Fbx23 and Fbx29 <strong>in</strong> the opportunistic pathogen Aspergillusfumigatus. Deletion of these genes results <strong>in</strong> growth defects under differentstress conditions <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g H 2O 2 mediated oxidative stress, and <strong>in</strong>creasedtemperature, which are important parts of the <strong>in</strong>nate immune response. Wecould further show that the gene for the F-box prote<strong>in</strong> Fbx15 is essantialfor virulence of A. fumigatus <strong>in</strong> a mur<strong>in</strong>e model. In contrast to this thefbx15 deletion mutant displays a enhanced production of theimmunosupressive mycotox<strong>in</strong>, gliotox<strong>in</strong> compared to wt andcomplementation stra<strong>in</strong>. In addition knock-out attemps of fbx25, another F-box encod<strong>in</strong>g gene revealed that this is an essantial fbx-gene for A.fumigatus. Functional GFP-tagged versions of Fbx15 and Fbx25 could belocalized <strong>in</strong> the nucleus suggest<strong>in</strong>g regulatory functions of these F-boxesfor certa<strong>in</strong> transcription factors. Future studies aim to identify potentialtargets of these F-box prote<strong>in</strong>s and their function <strong>in</strong> stress recognition andresponse.This work is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgeme<strong>in</strong>schaft, DFGResearch Unit 1334.BIOspektrum | Tagungsband <strong>2012</strong>
- Page 5 and 6:
Instruments that are music to your
- Page 7 and 8:
General Information2012 Annual Conf
- Page 9 and 10:
SPONSORS & EXHIBITORS9Sponsoren und
- Page 11 and 12:
11BIOspektrum | Tagungsband 2012
- Page 13 and 14:
13BIOspektrum | Tagungsband 2012
- Page 16:
16 AUS DEN FACHGRUPPEN DER VAAMFach
- Page 20 and 21:
20 AUS DEN FACHGRUPPEN DER VAAMFach
- Page 22 and 23:
22 AUS DEN FACHGRUPPEN DER VAAMMitg
- Page 24 and 25:
24 INSTITUTSPORTRAITin the differen
- Page 26 and 27:
26 INSTITUTSPORTRAITProf. Dr. Lutz
- Page 28 and 29:
28 CONFERENCE PROGRAMME | OVERVIEWS
- Page 30 and 31: 30 CONFERENCE PROGRAMME | OVERVIEWT
- Page 32 and 33: 32 CONFERENCE PROGRAMMECONFERENCE P
- Page 34 and 35: 34 CONFERENCE PROGRAMMECONFERENCE P
- Page 36 and 37: 36 SPECIAL GROUPSACTIVITIES OF THE
- Page 38 and 39: 38 SPECIAL GROUPSACTIVITIES OF THE
- Page 40 and 41: 40 SPECIAL GROUPSACTIVITIES OF THE
- Page 42 and 43: 42 SHORT LECTURESMonday, March 19,
- Page 44 and 45: 44 SHORT LECTURESMonday, March 19,
- Page 46 and 47: 46 SHORT LECTURESTuesday, March 20,
- Page 48 and 49: 48 SHORT LECTURESWednesday, March 2
- Page 50 and 51: 50 SHORT LECTURESWednesday, March 2
- Page 52 and 53: 52ISV01Die verborgene Welt der Bakt
- Page 54 and 55: 54protein is reversibly uridylylate
- Page 56 and 57: 56that this trapping depends on the
- Page 58 and 59: 58Here, multiple parameters were an
- Page 60 and 61: 60BDP016The paryphoplasm of Plancto
- Page 62 and 63: 62of A-PG was found responsible for
- Page 64 and 65: 64CEV012Synthetic analysis of the a
- Page 66 and 67: 66CEP004Investigation on the subcel
- Page 68 and 69: 68CEP013Role of RodA in Staphylococ
- Page 70 and 71: 70MurNAc-L-Ala-D-Glu-LL-Dap-D-Ala-D
- Page 72 and 73: 72CEP032Yeast mitochondria as a mod
- Page 74 and 75: 74as health problem due to the alle
- Page 76 and 77: 76[3]. In summary, hypoxia has a st
- Page 78 and 79: 78This different behavior challenge
- Page 82 and 83: 82FUP018FbFP as an Oxygen-Independe
- Page 84 and 85: 84defence enzymes, were found to be
- Page 86 and 87: 86DNA was extracted and shotgun seq
- Page 88 and 89: 88laboratory conditions the non-car
- Page 90 and 91: 90MEV003Biosynthesis of class III l
- Page 92 and 93: 92provide an insight into the regul
- Page 94 and 95: 94MEP007Identification and toxigeni
- Page 96 and 97: 96various carotenoids instead of de
- Page 98 and 99: 98MEP025Regulation of pristinamycin
- Page 100 and 101: 100that the genes for AOH polyketid
- Page 102 and 103: 102Knoll, C., du Toit, M., Schnell,
- Page 104 and 105: 104pathogenicity of NDM- and non-ND
- Page 106 and 107: 106MPV013Bartonella henselae adhesi
- Page 108 and 109: 108Yfi regulatory system. YfiBNR is
- Page 110 and 111: 110identification of Staphylococcus
- Page 112 and 113: 112that a unit increase in water te
- Page 114 and 115: 114MPP020Induction of the NF-kb sig
- Page 116 and 117: 116[3] Liu, C. et al., 2010. Adhesi
- Page 118 and 119: 118virulence provides novel targets
- Page 120 and 121: 120proteins are excreted. On the co
- Page 122 and 123: 122MPP054BopC is a type III secreti
- Page 124 and 125: 124MPP062Invasiveness of Salmonella
- Page 126 and 127: 126Finally, selected strains were c
- Page 128 and 129: 128interactions. Taken together, ou
- Page 130 and 131:
130forS. Typhimurium. Uncovering th
- Page 132 and 133:
132understand the exact role of Fla
- Page 134 and 135:
134heterotrimeric, Rrp4- and Csl4-c
- Page 136 and 137:
136OTV024Induction of systemic resi
- Page 138 and 139:
13816S rRNA genes was applied to ac
- Page 140 and 141:
140membrane permeability of 390Lh -
- Page 142 and 143:
142bacteria in situ, we used 16S rR
- Page 144 and 145:
144bacteria were resistant to acid,
- Page 146 and 147:
1461. Ye, L.D., Schilhabel, A., Bar
- Page 148 and 149:
148using real-time PCR. Activity me
- Page 150 and 151:
150When Ms. mazei pWM321-p1687-uidA
- Page 152 and 153:
152OTP065The role of GvpM in gas ve
- Page 154 and 155:
154OTP074Comparison of Faecal Cultu
- Page 156 and 157:
156OTP084The Use of GFP-GvpE fusion
- Page 158 and 159:
158compared to 20 ºC. An increase
- Page 160 and 161:
160characterised this plasmid in de
- Page 162 and 163:
162Streptomyces sp. strain FLA show
- Page 164 and 165:
164The study results indicated that
- Page 166 and 167:
166have shown direct evidences, for
- Page 168 and 169:
168biosurfactant. The putative lipo
- Page 170 and 171:
170the absence of legally mandated
- Page 172 and 173:
172where lowest concentrations were
- Page 174 and 175:
174PSV008Physiological effects of d
- Page 176 and 177:
176of pH i in vivo using the pH sen
- Page 178 and 179:
178PSP010Crystal structure of the e
- Page 180 and 181:
180PSP018Screening for genes of Sta
- Page 182 and 183:
182In order to overproduce all enzy
- Page 184 and 185:
184substrate specific expression of
- Page 186 and 187:
186potential active site region. We
- Page 188 and 189:
188PSP054Elucidation of the tetrach
- Page 190 and 191:
190family, but only one of these, t
- Page 192 and 193:
192network stabilizes the reactive
- Page 194 and 195:
194conditions tested. Its 2D struct
- Page 196 and 197:
196down of RSs2430 influences the e
- Page 198 and 199:
198demonstrating its suitability as
- Page 200 and 201:
200RSP025The pH-responsive transcri
- Page 202 and 203:
202attracted the attention of molec
- Page 204 and 205:
204A (CoA)-thioester intermediates.
- Page 206 and 207:
206Ser46~P complex. Additionally, B
- Page 208 and 209:
208threat to the health of reefs wo
- Page 210 and 211:
210their ectosymbionts to varying s
- Page 212 and 213:
212SMV008Methanol Consumption by Me
- Page 214 and 215:
214determined as a function of the
- Page 216 and 217:
216Funding by BMWi (AiF project no.
- Page 218 and 219:
218broad distribution in nature, oc
- Page 220 and 221:
220SMP027Contrasting assimilators o
- Page 222 and 223:
222growing all over the North, Cent
- Page 224 and 225:
224SMP044RNase J and RNase E in Sin
- Page 226 and 227:
226labelled hydrocarbons or potenti
- Page 228 and 229:
228SSV009Mathematical modelling of
- Page 230 and 231:
230SSP006Initial proteome analysis
- Page 232 and 233:
232nine putative PHB depolymerases
- Page 234 and 235:
234[1991]. We were able to demonstr
- Page 236 and 237:
236of these proteins are putative m
- Page 238 and 239:
238YEV2-FGMechanistic insight into
- Page 240 and 241:
240 AUTORENAbdel-Mageed, W.Achstett
- Page 242 and 243:
242 AUTORENFarajkhah, H.HMP002Faral
- Page 244 and 245:
244 AUTORENJung, Kr.Jung, P.Junge,
- Page 246:
246 AUTORENNajafi, F.MEP007Naji, S.
- Page 249 and 250:
249van Dijk, G.van Engelen, E.van H
- Page 251 and 252:
251Eckhard Boles von der Universit
- Page 253 and 254:
253Anna-Katharina Wagner: Regulatio
- Page 255 and 256:
255Vera Bockemühl: Produktioneiner
- Page 257 and 258:
257Meike Ammon: Analyse der subzell
- Page 259 and 260:
springer-spektrum.deDas große neue