20.07.2015 Views

VAAM-Jahrestagung 2012 18.–21. März in Tübingen

VAAM-Jahrestagung 2012 18.–21. März in Tübingen

VAAM-Jahrestagung 2012 18.–21. März in Tübingen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

193reduced. Summariz<strong>in</strong>g, P. lum<strong>in</strong>escens does produce a novel cell-cellsignal<strong>in</strong>g molecule, PLAI-1, that controls the expression of the plu4568-plu4563 operon <strong>in</strong> a manner that is dependent on the orphan LuxR-likeregulator, PluR.RSV008-Hydroxyketone-mediated signal transduction <strong>in</strong> LegionellapneumophilaA. Kessler*, U. Schell, C. Harrison, H. HilbiMax von Pettenkofer Institute, LMU München, München, GermanyThe causative agent of Legionnaires' disease, Legionella pneumophila, is aparasite of environmental protozoa. L. pneumophila employs a biphasiclife cycle to replicate with<strong>in</strong> and spread to new host cells. The switch fromthe replicative to the transmissive (virulent) state is coord<strong>in</strong>ated by acomplex regulatory network, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g signal<strong>in</strong>g through endogenouslysynthesized small molecules (“auto<strong>in</strong>ducers”) <strong>in</strong> a process termed “quorumsens<strong>in</strong>g”. L. pneumophila produces and likely responds to -hydroxyketone signal<strong>in</strong>g molecules [1].The lqs (Legionella quorum sens<strong>in</strong>g) gene cluster harbors homologs of theVibrio cholerae cqsAS genes, i.e. lqsA and lqsS, flank<strong>in</strong>g a gene calledlqsR. The auto<strong>in</strong>ducer synthase LqsA catalyzes the production of LAI-1(Legionella auto<strong>in</strong>ducer-1, 3-hydroxypentadecan-4-one), which ispresumably recognized by the sensor k<strong>in</strong>ase LqsS, and LqsR is a novelputative response regulator that controls bacterial virulence andreplication. Functional studies and transcriptome analysis revealed thatlqsR, lqsS and lqsA regulate L. pneumophila-host cell <strong>in</strong>teractions,extracellular filaments and a genomic “fitness island” [1].Through bio<strong>in</strong>formatic analysis an “orphan” homolog of the sensor k<strong>in</strong>aselqsS was identified <strong>in</strong> the L. pneumophila genome and termed lqsT. L.pneumophila lack<strong>in</strong>g lqsT is impaired for virulence and <strong>in</strong>tracellularreplication. Biochemical studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that LqsS and LqsT are sensork<strong>in</strong>ases, which <strong>in</strong>teract with the putative response regulator LqsR. Theseresults suggest that L. pneumophila responds to -hydroxyketone signalssensed by LqsS and LqsT, which converge on LqsR. Us<strong>in</strong>g biochemical,genetic and cellular microbial approaches, the role of LqsS, LqsT andLqsR <strong>in</strong> -hydroxyketone-mediated signal transduction and generegulation is further analyzed <strong>in</strong> detail.[1] Tiaden A., Spirig, T. and Hilbi, H. (2010) Bacterial gene regulation by -hydroxyketonesignal<strong>in</strong>g. Trends Microbiol.18, 288-297.RSV009A high-frequency mutation <strong>in</strong> Bacillus subtilis: Requirements forthe decryptification of the gudB glutamate dehydrogenase geneF. Commichau*, S. Tholen, K. GunkaMicrobiology and Genetics, General Microbiology, Gött<strong>in</strong>gen, GermanyCommon laboratory stra<strong>in</strong>s of Bacillus subtilis encode two catabolicglutamate dehydrogenases, the enzymatically active prote<strong>in</strong> RocG and thecryptic enzyme GudB that is <strong>in</strong>active due to a duplication of three am<strong>in</strong>oacids <strong>in</strong> its active centre (1, 2). The <strong>in</strong>activation of the rocG gene results <strong>in</strong>poor growth of the bacteria on complex media due to the accumulation oftoxic <strong>in</strong>termediates. Therefore, rocG mutants readily acquire suppressormutations that decryptify the gudB gene. We showed that thedecryptification occurs by a precise deletion of one part of the n<strong>in</strong>e basepair direct repeat that causes the am<strong>in</strong>o acid duplication. The deletionoccurs at the extremely high rate of 10 -4 (3). This is the highest mutationrate that was observed for a specific allele <strong>in</strong> B. subtilis. Mutationsaffect<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>tegrity of the direct repeat result <strong>in</strong> a strong reduction of themutation rate; however, the actual sequence of the repeat is not essential(3). We also demonstrated that the mutation rate of gudB is not affected bythe position of the gene on the chromosome. When the direct repeat wasplaced <strong>in</strong> the completely different context of an artificial promoter, theprecise deletion of one part of the repeat was also observed, but themutation rate was reduced by three orders of magnitude. Thus,transcription of the gudB gene seems to be essential for the high rate of theappearance of the gudB1 mutation. This idea is supported by the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gthat the transcription-repair coupl<strong>in</strong>g factor Mfd is required for thedecryptification of gudB. The Mfd-mediated coupl<strong>in</strong>g of transcription tomutagenesis can be regarded as a built-<strong>in</strong> precaution that facilitates theaccumulation of mutations preferentially <strong>in</strong> transcribed genes (4).1) Belitsky and Sonenshe<strong>in</strong>, 1998. J. Bacteriol. 180: 6298-6305.2) Zeigler et al., 2008. J. Bacteriol. 190: 6983-6995.3) Gunka et al., <strong>2012</strong>. J. Bacteriol. In press.4) Ayora et al., 1996. J. Mol. Biol. 256: 301-318.RSV010The PpsR Prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Rhodospirillum rubrum: A majormetabolism coord<strong>in</strong>atorA. Carius*, L. Carius, H. GrammelMax Planck Institut, BMBF Nachwuchsgruppe Redoxphänomene <strong>in</strong>Purpurbakterien, Magdeburg, GermanyBe<strong>in</strong>g a facultative anoxygenic photosynthetic bacterium, Rhodospirillumrubrum is able to adapt to various environmental conditions. Especially,the availability of oxygen demands for a precise regulatory response <strong>in</strong>purple bacteria. Under anaerobic conditions anoxygenic photosynthesis isa very important energy source, but under aerobic conditions thephotosynthetic membranes (PM) can produce highly toxic reactive oxygenspecies. The switch between aerobic respiratory metabolism and anaerobicphotosynthetic metabolism is a great regulatory challenge for all purplebacteria so that many regulators are <strong>in</strong>volved and several <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>gstrategies have evolved.In most purple bacteria, two major regulatory systems, the RegB/RegAsystem and the PpsR system control photosynthetic gene expression. Bothsystems are well <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> Rhodobacter species, often compared withR. rubrum. Basically, the RegB/RegA system activates photosyntheticgene expression when oxygen concentration is low, whereas PpsRrepresses the expression under aerobic conditions.Generally, <strong>in</strong> purple bacteria, the application of semiaerobic darkconditions results <strong>in</strong> basal expression of photosynthetic genes. However,so far only observed <strong>in</strong> R. rubrum, this PM-level can be strongly <strong>in</strong>creasedby the addition of fructose or reduced glutathione to the culture medium(1). It is tempt<strong>in</strong>g to assume that both compounds provide additionalreduc<strong>in</strong>g equivalents thereby affect<strong>in</strong>g identical redox regulatorypathways. Furthermore, no homologues of RegB/RegA can be found bygene sequence analysis <strong>in</strong> R. rubrum. This suggests a more central role ofthe PpsR-homologue <strong>in</strong> this bacterium.In this work, we show that PpsR <strong>in</strong> R. rubrum is most likely an activatorprote<strong>in</strong> for the photosynthetic genes. We used PpsR from heterologousexpression <strong>in</strong> E. coli for DNA-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g assays and overexpression stra<strong>in</strong>sfor the elucidation of the role of PpsR <strong>in</strong> R. rubrum. The significance ofPpsR is underl<strong>in</strong>ed by the fact that no stable deletion stra<strong>in</strong> could be created.1. Carius, A., M. Henkel, and H. Grammel. 2011. A glutathione redox effect on photosyntheticmembrane expression <strong>in</strong> Rhodospirillum rubrum. J. Bacteriol. 193(8):1893-1900.RSV011F<strong>in</strong>e-tun<strong>in</strong>g of sulfur metabolism by a peptide-cod<strong>in</strong>g sRNA <strong>in</strong>the photooxidative stress response of RhodobacterB. Berghoff*, Y. Hermanns, G. KlugJustus-Liebig-University, Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Gießen,GermanyThe photosynthetic model organism Rhodobacter sphaeroides facesphotooxidative stress due to the bacteriochlorophyll-mediated generation ofs<strong>in</strong>glet oxygen ( 1 O 2) <strong>in</strong> the light. In recent years several regulatory factors wereidentified which guide adaptation to these harmful conditions. The alternativesigma factor RpoE, which is on top of 1 O 2-dependent regulation, <strong>in</strong>ducesamongst others the 219 nt long sRNA RSs0019 (1). RSs0019 conta<strong>in</strong>s a smallORF (150 nt), which was shown to be strongly translated under 1 O 2 stress.Overexpression of RSs0019 comb<strong>in</strong>ed with microarray analysis suggested arole <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>e-tun<strong>in</strong>g of sulfur metabolism. To dist<strong>in</strong>guish between peptide- versussRNA-driven effects, an RSs0019 variant with an <strong>in</strong>ternal stop-codon wasdesigned and compared to the genu<strong>in</strong>e sRNA by real time RT-PCR. Theseexperiments both verified the microarray data and suggested RSs0019 to be abifunctional RNA. To ga<strong>in</strong> further <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>to the regulatory mechanisms,more precisely the RNA b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g and potential translational effects of RSs0019,we made use of a lacZ-based <strong>in</strong> vivo reporter system for Rhodobacter. In thiscontext, mutational analyses of both RSs0019 and potential target mRNAs wereconstructed to uncover dist<strong>in</strong>ct <strong>in</strong>teractions and outputs. Our data provideevidence that RSs0019 is a riboregulator which encodes a small peptide andf<strong>in</strong>e-tunes the sulfur metabolism <strong>in</strong> Rhodobacter when sulfur stress orig<strong>in</strong>atesafter 1 O 2 generation.(1) Berghoff, B.A., Glaeser, J., Sharma, C.M., Vogel, J. and Klug, G. (2009) Photooxidative stress<strong>in</strong>ducedand abundant small RNAs <strong>in</strong>Rhodobacter sphaeroides.Mol. Microbiol., 74(6), 1497-1512.RSV012The conserved sRNA scr5239 controls DagA expression bytranslational repressionM. Vockenhuber*, B. SuessGoethe Universität Frankfurt, RNA Biochemie, Frankfurt, GermanyWe were <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> the identification and characterization of sRNAs <strong>in</strong>Streptomyces coelicolor. To f<strong>in</strong>d such transcripts we performed deepsequenc<strong>in</strong>g of the S. coelicolor transcriptome. That way we identified 63new non-cod<strong>in</strong>g RNAs and confirmed the expression for 11 [1].One sRNA - called scr5239 - found <strong>in</strong> the sequenc<strong>in</strong>g data especiallyattracted our <strong>in</strong>terest because of its high degree of sequence and structureconservation. It is a 159 nt long sRNA with >90% conservation <strong>in</strong> 15streptomyces genomes and is constitutively expressed under mostBIOspektrum | Tagungsband <strong>2012</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!