Economic Report of the President
Report - The American Presidency Project
Report - The American Presidency Project
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
nications industries through <strong>the</strong> regulation <strong>of</strong> common carriers andbroadcasters. Several important steps toward deregulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>seindustries were initiated in 1982. The government can enhance <strong>the</strong>development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se industries through continued deregulation.EFFECTS OF AVIATION DEREGULATIONUntil <strong>the</strong> late 1970s <strong>the</strong> Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) regulated<strong>the</strong> airline industry extensively. It allocated interstate routes among<strong>the</strong> airlines and controlled airline fares on those routes. Through itscontrol <strong>of</strong> air routes, <strong>the</strong> CAB restrained entry into <strong>the</strong> airline industry.From its inception in 1938 until <strong>the</strong> late 1970s, <strong>the</strong> CAB did notallow any new airline to enter <strong>the</strong> interstate trunk market. Largely asa consequence, air fares were higher on most interstate routes than ifprice competition and freedom <strong>of</strong> entry were permitted. This was reflectedby <strong>the</strong> differences in fares between intrastate city-pairs thatwere not subject to CAB regulation, such as Los Angeles-San Francisco,and comparable interstate city-pairs that were. The latter <strong>of</strong>tenhad fares that were as much as 60 percent higher than <strong>the</strong> former.In 1977 <strong>the</strong> CAB began to ease restrictions on fares and entry. In1978 <strong>the</strong> Congress affirmed and extended <strong>the</strong> CAB's measures bypassing <strong>the</strong> Airline Deregulation Act. This act provided for <strong>the</strong> gradualderegulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> airlines, with <strong>the</strong> termination <strong>of</strong> CAB domesticroute authority in 1981, <strong>the</strong> termination <strong>of</strong> CAB domestic pricingauthority in 1983, and <strong>the</strong> elimination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CAB itself in 1985. Subsequentsteps were taken to increase potential competition in internationalaviation. In July 1982 <strong>the</strong> U.S. Government entered a multilateralagreement with several European governments that permitsgreater flexibility in airline fares for trans-Atlantic flights than waspreviously allowed.While rising aviation fuel costs, <strong>the</strong> weak economy, and <strong>the</strong> 1981air traffic controllers strike complicate assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong>gradual deregulation, route and fare competition have increased substantiallysince 1977. From 1978 to 1981, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> U.S. certificatedairlines more than doubled (from 36 to 86). The market share<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major trunk airlines declined from 87.3 to 80.4 percent in <strong>the</strong>past 3 years while, during this same period, <strong>the</strong> market share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>local, intrastate, and new airlines increased from 11.5 to 16.4 percent.Aircraft departures from large, medium, small, and nonhub airportsincreased substantially over <strong>the</strong> 2 years immediately followingairline deregulation. The percentage <strong>of</strong> domestic markets with fouror more carriers grew from 13 in May 1978 to 73 in May 1981. InApril 1982, 77 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> domestic coach traffic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major airlinesmoved on discount fares, compared to 46 percent in April1978. And while operating expenses per available seat mile rose by109