08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Report - The American Presidency Project

Report - The American Presidency Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

widespread misconceptions about <strong>the</strong> competitive position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>United States is essential if we are to get through <strong>the</strong> difficult periodahead without making major policy mistakes. The second section <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> chapter is devoted to financial developments and <strong>the</strong>ir effects ontrade, especially <strong>the</strong> appreciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dollar and its likely effects on<strong>the</strong> U.S. trade balance. Two final sections examine macroeconomicand financial problems in Europe and <strong>the</strong> developing countries.LONG-RUN TRENDS IN U.S. COMPETITIVENESS:PERCEPTIONS AND REALITIESConcern over <strong>the</strong> international competitiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates is as high as it has ever been. It is argued with increasing frequencythat U.S. business has steadily lost ground in <strong>the</strong> internationalmarketplace. This alleged poor performance is <strong>of</strong>ten attributedboth to failures <strong>of</strong> management in <strong>the</strong> United States and to <strong>the</strong> supportgiven to foreign businesses by <strong>the</strong>ir home governments. Feeding<strong>the</strong> perception <strong>of</strong> declining competitiveness is <strong>the</strong> persistent U.S.deficit in merchandise trade, especially <strong>the</strong> imbalance in trade withJapan.Changes in U.S. trade performance must, however, be put into <strong>the</strong>context <strong>of</strong> changes in <strong>the</strong> U.S. role in <strong>the</strong> world economy. This widerapproach reveals that much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concern about long-run competitivenessis based on misperceptions. Although <strong>the</strong> recent appreciation<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dollar has created a temporary loss <strong>of</strong> competitiveness,<strong>the</strong> United States has not experienced a persistent loss <strong>of</strong> ability tosell its products on international markets; in fact, in <strong>the</strong> 1970s <strong>the</strong>United States held its own in terms <strong>of</strong> output, exports, and employment.Changes in <strong>the</strong> relationship <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States to <strong>the</strong> worldeconomy, however, have made <strong>the</strong> United States look less competitiveby some traditional measures.AGGREGATE PERFORMANCE OF THE UNITED STATES AND OTHERDEVELOPED COUNTRIESDiscussion <strong>of</strong> U.S. competitiveness <strong>of</strong>ten gives <strong>the</strong> misleading impressionthat <strong>the</strong> United States has consistently performed poorly relativeto o<strong>the</strong>r industrial countries. The U.S. share <strong>of</strong> world trade andworld GNP did in fact decline throughout <strong>the</strong> 1950s and 1960s, reflecting<strong>the</strong> recovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world from World War II, toge<strong>the</strong>rwith <strong>the</strong> narrowing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> huge and unsustainable U.S. technologicallead. In <strong>the</strong> 1970s, however, this long decline leveled <strong>of</strong>f.• From 1973 to 1980, real gross domestic product (GDP) in <strong>the</strong>United States grew at an annual rate <strong>of</strong> 2.3 percent, compared52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!