08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Report - The American Presidency Project

Report - The American Presidency Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sophisticated capital goods occurs when <strong>the</strong> demand for new capitalgoods increases.The legacy <strong>of</strong> past policies, which have artificially depressed savingand investment, provides a second reason for increasing <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong>capital formation. As described below, this discrimination againstcapital formation has taken many forms, including tax policy, monetarypolicy and recurring Federal budget deficits. Although <strong>the</strong>reexist instances <strong>of</strong> market failure, a market economy can generally beexpected to allocate resources in an efficient way. When public policiessystematically discriminate against one type <strong>of</strong> spending, however,<strong>the</strong>re is a strong presumption that too little <strong>of</strong> it will take place.A related and final justification for increased capital formationcomes from a comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total pretax return to investmentwith <strong>the</strong> return received by private investors. Estimates suggest that<strong>the</strong> total pretax return to investment in corporate capital, as measuredby its pretax marginal product, is about 11 percent. This meansthat $1.00 invested today yields society $1.11 next year, or alternativelya permanent yield <strong>of</strong> 11 cents. While <strong>the</strong> total pretax returnfluctuates from year to year with cyclical conditions, studies havetended to find that it has stayed within <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> 8 to 15 percentthroughout <strong>the</strong> postwar period.In contrast, private investors have earned much smaller rates <strong>of</strong>return over <strong>the</strong> last several decades, with many investors earningnegative real after-tax returns over much <strong>of</strong> that period. Even leavingaside <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> personal taxes, <strong>the</strong> real return on short-term debtinstruments averaged less than 1 percent during <strong>the</strong> 1950-81 interval.While equity investments have yielded a higher average return,<strong>the</strong>y carry with <strong>the</strong>m a large amount <strong>of</strong> risk. The average real returnon common stock before personal taxes was 6 percent over <strong>the</strong>1950-81 period, but investors lost money in real terms in 12 <strong>of</strong> thoseyears and over periods as long as 17 years.This large spread between <strong>the</strong> total and private returns to investmentis a consequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tax system, which extracts a portion <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> total return to investment before it reaches private investors.Capital market returns are reduced because <strong>the</strong> corporate income taxreduces <strong>the</strong> return that corporations can pay out to investors. As aconsequence <strong>of</strong> this tax-induced divergence between <strong>the</strong> private andtotal return to investment, too little investment takes place. This suggests<strong>the</strong> desirability <strong>of</strong> measures both to reduce tax distortions andto increase incentives to save and invest.84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!