08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Report - The American Presidency Project

Report - The American Presidency Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Over short periods <strong>of</strong> time a variety <strong>of</strong> factors influence <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong>inflation. One important factor in <strong>the</strong> 1970s was supply-determinedchanges in commodity prices resulting from fluctuations in harvestsand disruptions in <strong>the</strong> supply <strong>of</strong> foreign oil. Ano<strong>the</strong>r important factorwas <strong>the</strong> increasing level <strong>of</strong> expected inflation. Once <strong>the</strong> expectation<strong>of</strong> continuing inflation has become firmly entrenched, prices andwages may continue to rise even in <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> declining demand, and<strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> reducing inflation may increase.These factors, however, only affect <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> inflation for a limitedtime. The popular axiom that attributes inflation to "too muchmoney chasing too few goods" reflects a basic truth: it is difficult toimagine a sustained inflation that is not supported by excessivemoney growth. Over long periods <strong>of</strong> time, an additional percentagepoint in <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> money stock will tend to producean additional percentage point <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> nominal GNP, that is,GNP measured at current prices. If <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> real GNP growth doesnot change, <strong>the</strong> entire increase in nominal GNP growth will take <strong>the</strong>form <strong>of</strong> increased inflation. Although <strong>the</strong> relations between moneygrowth, nominal GNP growth, and inflation are considerably morevariable over shorter periods than <strong>the</strong>y are in <strong>the</strong> long run, <strong>the</strong>impact <strong>of</strong> money growth on nominal income and inflation remainspowerful even in <strong>the</strong> short run.THE RECESSIONThe substantial decline in <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ml measure <strong>of</strong>money that occurred between <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1980 and <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1981was a principal contributor to <strong>the</strong> decline in nominal income growthin 1982, a decline compounded by a marked change in <strong>the</strong> velocity <strong>of</strong>money. Part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> slowdown in nominal GNP growth took <strong>the</strong> form<strong>of</strong> lower inflation, and part <strong>of</strong> it took <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> a decline in realeconomic activity.The adverse short-run effect <strong>of</strong> a slowdown in nominal GNP onreal economic activity is a basic feature <strong>of</strong> our economy that reflects<strong>the</strong> stickiness <strong>of</strong> wages and prices in most markets. If prices andwages were perfectly flexible, reduced nominal GNP growth wouldtranslate immediately and painlessly into reduced inflation. However,not all wages and prices are flexible. When expectations <strong>of</strong> future inflationare deeply embedded, prices and wages may continue to risefor some time despite excess supplies <strong>of</strong> goods and labor. A changein inflationary expectations, toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> direct pressures exertedby excess supplies, eventually causes prices and wages to adjust tonew market-clearing levels. But until that occurs a slowdown in nomi-20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!