21.03.2016 Views

e-CAL - e-Coaching et Apprentissage des Langues

The ERASMUS+ project e-CAL presents the result of an analysis of support methods in the case of language learning using web-based Open Educational Resources (OER).

The ERASMUS+ project e-CAL presents the result of an analysis of support methods in the case of language learning using web-based Open Educational Resources (OER).

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

e-<strong>Coaching</strong> <strong>et</strong> <strong>Apprentissage</strong> <strong>des</strong> <strong>Langues</strong> /N° de proj<strong>et</strong> : 2015-1-FR01-KA204-015334<br />

Thematic Area “Resources”<br />

Nearly all analysed examples are relevant to the thematic area “Resources” by offering very different<br />

kinds of online resources.<br />

On one hand, it must be stated that the mark<strong>et</strong> of OER for language learning is still dominated by a<br />

large number of traditional computer-based training packages. This kind of resources is best <strong>des</strong>cribed<br />

by m<strong>et</strong>aphors such as drill & kill or grammar hammer. 15 There are still too many OER of the<br />

instructional kind and too less of a dynamic or game-based style available. The vast majority of OER<br />

for language learning still follows in the footsteps of traditional, workbook-style exercises for selfstudy.<br />

Such materials usually package existing exercise formats into an interactive multimediaenhanced<br />

platform. Developers all too often rely on <strong>des</strong>igning impressive multimedia enhanced<br />

packages which hide the fact that most of the interactions provided are an adaptation of simple<br />

traditional exercise formats to a digital. There are a large number of vocabulary drills, multiple choice<br />

and gap-filling exercises or similar tutorial formats. Too often, technical considerations and the power<br />

of multimedia features dominate the <strong>des</strong>ign of OER for language learning. Sound, picture, animation,<br />

and video are integrated.<br />

19<br />

Doubtless these options increase the attractiveness of the resources and, thus, also learner<br />

acceptance. But often, the usability is not as intuitive as needed for the acquisition of skills and it is<br />

even questionable if a guide is necessary for explaining their technical use. A language learning<br />

website which declares that its resources are WCAG 2.0 compatible was not identified. The need for<br />

accessible resources has not y<strong>et</strong> picked up by developers .<br />

On the other hand, it can also be stated that there are a number of areas and language learning<br />

contexts within which new technologies are being used very successfully. And this is the starting point<br />

of e<strong>CAL</strong> activities and the criterion for including certain OER in our self-directed language learning e.g.<br />

resources that deal with matching, text reconstruction and text manipulation exercises. Also quite<br />

often computer-specific forms of interaction, such as drag & drop are used to provide more<br />

exploratory learning mo<strong>des</strong>. An important feature of State-of-Art OER are the possibilities to be<br />

revised, remixed, added upon, translated, and then shared again to me<strong>et</strong> different needs. 16 These<br />

OERs offer additional kinds of learning activities, more in line with innovative m<strong>et</strong>hodology.<br />

The majority of language learning resources refer to the Common European Framework of Reference<br />

for Languages (CEFRL) by indicating the use of the OER for defined levels.<br />

The selection of an OER that will support the self-directed language learning is a critical<br />

resource decision 17 . First, teachers and learners have to know where to go on the web to g<strong>et</strong> high<br />

quality free (or cheap) resources for language learning. Several examples like Lingu@n<strong>et</strong> (N 13 ),<br />

iPortal (N 22) or INV-ICT (N 23) present databases of resources provided by different developers.<br />

Second, the OER identified has to be evaluated against several criteria, e.g. the OER should<br />

• support and be consistent with <strong>des</strong>ired learning outcomes<br />

• be developed by comp<strong>et</strong>ent authors and producers and me<strong>et</strong> high standards of quality in<br />

content and presentation<br />

• be appropriate for the learning area and for the age, emotional development, ability level,<br />

learning styles, and social development of the learners<br />

• have aesth<strong>et</strong>ic, literary, and/or social value<br />

• have an appearance suitable for the intended use<br />

15 http://archive.ecml.at/projects/voll/rationale_and_help/theory/menu_theory.htm<br />

16 http://gui<strong>des</strong>.library.illinois.edu/c.php?g=246992&p=1645508 16.01.2016<br />

17 http://www.tllg.unisa.edu.au/lib_guide/gllt_ch4.pdf and http://www.tllg.unisa.edu.au/guide.html

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!