24.02.2017 Views

Structural Concrete - Hassoun

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

896 Chapter 22 Prestressed <strong>Concrete</strong> Bridge Design<br />

minimum factor for the permanent loads are specified in Table 22.9. The minimum factors are<br />

to be used in the strength limit states to produce maximum effects of live load. In other words,<br />

when the effect of live load is opposite to that of permanent load, the minimum combinations are<br />

to be used.<br />

22.5 GRAVITY LOADS<br />

Gravity loads include permanent and live loads that are caused by the self-weight of the bridge and<br />

the weight of objects on the bridge. Such loads are applied in a downward direction (toward the<br />

center of the earth).<br />

22.5.1 Permanent Loads (AASHTO 3.5)<br />

Permanent loads include dead loads and earth loads that remain on the bridge for the entire service<br />

life. Such loads include DC, DW, EV, EH, ES, and DD specified in Section 22.4.2.<br />

22.5.2 Live Loads (AASHTO 3.6)<br />

The scope is limited to gravity live loads, which include vehicular live load (LL) and pedestrian<br />

live load (PL).<br />

22.5.2.1 Vehicular Live Load (AASHTO 3.6.1.1). A typical bridge is designed for several longitudinal<br />

traffic lanes of equal width that are defined as traffic lane and design lane. The traffic<br />

lane is the amount of traffic that the traffic engineer plans to route across the bridge whose<br />

width is associated with a traffic lane of, typically, 10 to 14 ft. The design lane is the number<br />

of lane designation that the bridge engineer uses for live-load placement to produce maximum<br />

load effects.<br />

Generally, the number of design lanes should be determined by taking the integer pat of the<br />

ratio ω/12.0, where ω is the clear roadway width in feet between curbs and/or barriers. Engineering<br />

judgment shall be used to ensure that the number of design lanes is not less than the number of traffic<br />

lanes. In case where the traffic lanes are less than 12.0 ft wide, the number of design lanes shall be<br />

equal to the number of traffic lanes, and the width of the design lane shall be taken as the width<br />

of the traffic lane. Possible future changes in the physical or functional clear roadway width of the<br />

bridge should be considered. Roadway widths from 20.0 to 24.0 ft shall have two design lanes, each<br />

equal to one-half the roadway width.<br />

22.5.2.2 Multiple Presence of Live Load (AASHTO 3.6.1.2). The extreme live-load effect shall<br />

be determined by considering each possible combination of number of loaded lanes multiplied<br />

by a corresponding multiple presence factor to account for the probability of simultaneous lane<br />

occupation by full HL-93 design live load. Multiple presence factors have been included in the<br />

equations for distribution factors and, therefore, shall not be applied in conjunction with load<br />

distribution factors except where a lever rule is used. The multiple presence factors are given<br />

in Table 22.10.<br />

22.5.2.3 Design Vehicular Live Load (AASHTO 3.6.1.2). Although the automobile is the most<br />

common vehicular live load on most bridges, trucks cause the critical load effects. Therefore,<br />

AASHTO design live loads attempt to model the truck traffic that may occur independent of or<br />

combined with other truck loads.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!