United States yearbook - 1982 (1)

300 State and Local Government Finances and Employment
No. 497. City Governments—Finances,
[In millions of dollars. For fiscal year dosed
REVENUE
CITIES RANKED BY POPULATION
SIZE, 1980
Total1
Total*
Intergovernmental
revenue
From
State
andlocaf
govts.
General revenue
From
Federal
Government
Total ‘
Taxes
Property
Sales
and
gross
receipts
Utility
revenue
Gross
d e b t
out*
standing
New YorK, N.Y.5........................... 17,797 1 5 ,6 4 2 5,623.5 1,266.5 6,706.9 3,228.0 1.612.0 979.4 10,645
Chicago, JIJ.................................... 1,9 3 4 1.659 226.4 491.6 736.2 3 1 5 .3 330.3 110.8 i.0 7 n
Los Angeles, Calif 2 ,6 8 9 1,491 140.7 266.0 674.3 239.1 2 9 5 .5 1.023.2 P f i i i
Philadelphia, Pa.*.......................... 1,941 1,471 486.0 172.6 783.7 193.5 3.5 373,4 1,835
Houston, Tex................................ 7 6 0 6 3 7 12.6 75.9 352.5 2 0 3 .0 142.2 69.6
Detroit, Mich............................. .... 1 ,3 8 4 1.171 324.5 259.5 360.9 176.5 3 7 .4 93.5
Dallas, Tex.................................... 4 7 5 3 7 6 7.8 58.9 215.9 122.7 87.8 63.4 5 6 2
San Diego, Calif........................... 4 1 9 3 4 3 54.5 64.4 116.9 38.3 70.0 51.7 117
Phoenix, A riz................................ 4 1 2 361 80.0 6 6 .4 120.6 39.1 75.8 36.5
Baltimore, Md.9............................ 1,168 1,08 B 434.5 20S.5 333.6 2 1 2 .2 32.3 30.7
San Antonio, Tex......................... 6 1 2 241 7.8 83,1 7 7 .6 43.1 32.0 365.8 9 6 9
Honolulu, Hawaii 2......................... 3 7 8 3 3 2 13.8 93.3 180.7 145.0 19.3 45.6
Indianapolis, Ind.*......................... 4 2 0 4 1 0 91.6 107.9 125.9 120,3 2.6 6 .2
San Francisco, Calif.a.................... 1,336 1,118 272.1 232.8 345.2 176.3 96.5 111.2 7 0 5
Memphis, Tenn........................... . 9 5 8 487 2 2 6 .7 77.9 102.1 72.8 17.1 438.6 6 0 3
Washington, D.C.3........................ 1,961 1,868 30.5 762.6 940.9 219.4 326.0 17.6 1,661
San Jose, Calif...................................... 2 6 0 240 36.5 18.9 106.0 27.8 50.8 1.9 175
Milwaukee, Wfs..................................... 4 0 5 340 133.2 33.9 90.2 86.3 1.2 21.6 311
Cleveland, Ohio........................... 4 3 4 355 34.9 80.0 139,4 43.9 1.4 79.7 4 3 3
Columbus, O h io ........................... 291 254 2 6.2 50.9 92.8 10.3 1.2 36.5 6 5 0
Boston, Mass.3.... 9 9 5 929 259.2 111.6 439.9 434.8 - 32.0 594
New Orleans, La.*................... ..... 4 2 2 392 37.6 119.1 139.1 42.2 114.8 19.5 4 5 6
Jacksonville, Fla.2......................... 587 290 62.9 42.1 82.8 66.0 22.1 2 8 6 .0 675
Seattle, Wash................. .............. 4 6 5 329 65.7 54.1 122.2 41.7 53.3 115.3 5 1 7
Denver, Colo.9............................... 5 2 5 473 62.5 80.9 185.6 63.9 101.0 39.7 391
Nashville-Davldson, Tenn. 1........... 681 415 82.1 63.0 174.1 105.1 54.8 2 5 4 .2 6 3 7
St. Louis, Mo.3.............................. 4 5 0 241 45.5 106.8 196.2 34.2 84.7 12.0 157
Kansas City, Mo, 3 5 3 3 1 3 14.1 86.1 166.1 26.2 7 0 .6 20.8 2 7 7
El Paso, Tex.,............................... 161 128 3.1 47.9 44.0 24.8 17.5 16.5 54
Atlanta, Ga ................................... 391 333 49.0 54.2 106.7 63.2 31.3 34.5 1.001
Pittsburgh, Pa............................... 2 5 9 2 3 7 31.7 62.0 115.8 65.8 8.9 14.3 191
Oklahoma City, Okla.................... 2 4 5 2 1 8 4.0 67.9 88.0 24.3 61.7 16.3 3 6 5
Cincinnati. Ohio............................ 3 5 8 311 56.8 69.5 121.4 26.7 1.4 24.4 184
Fort Worth, Tex........................... 1 8 2 153 3.3 29.6 65.6 38.1 24.9 17.6 2 1 6
Minneapolis, Minn.................. 281 241 67.0 50.8 75.2 62.3 7.6 13.2 4 3 8
Portland, Oreg..... ........................ 211 192 15.0 44.7 79.6 57.1 10.6 17.4 263
Long Beach, CaJJf 3 4 6 264 10.0 64.7 61.3 19.2 33.0 8 2 .2 107
Tulsa, Okla......... 2 0 7 181 4.4 33.0 64.9 9.8 53.1 17.8 4 1 3
Buffalo, N.Y____ 4 3 6 4 2 5 196.2 66,0 98.9 88.1 8.7 11.3 2 5 6
Toledo, Ohio....... 1 7 3 161 14.6 49.3 61.1 8.7 .4 12.1 162
Miami, Fla____ ............................. 1 8 3 167 30.3 25.2 84.7 55.7 24.2 149
Baton Rouge, La.3 1 8 3 167 15.7 44.4 74.3 19.1 50.1 1.8 421
Austin, Tex......... 3 2 4 152 29.7 24.0 54.5 33.0 19.6 159.4 6 6 5
Oakland, Calif...... 2 2 3 211 16.9 49.0 73.5 25.4 32.2 _
247
Albuquerque, N. Mex................... 174 157 40.8 33.3 40.4 23.1 12.5 17.2 269
Tucson, Arlz....... 1 7 3 141 31.2 29.1 60.3 9.2 48.6 28.4 144
Newark. N.J........ 4 0 7 391 240.3 25.5 105.4 69.4 27.8 14.7 140
Charlotte. N.C.... 171 156 29.4 40.2 55.6 52.1 -
1 2 .2 2 0 0
Omaha. Nebr...... 146 140 19.7 20.1 87.9 31.7 32.1 129
Louisville, Ky..................... .......... 2 1 0 174 13.3 64.3 70.5 21.1 3.8 2 6 .5 2 4 3
Birmingham, Ala............................ 151 139 9.2 22.0 70.4 14.8 21.6 3 1 5
Wichita, Kans.... . 173 150 12.9 32.8 41.6 33.1 6.7 15.5 554
Sacramento, Calif 148 130 15.4 17.6 53.7 17.4 27.4 7.7 8 5
Tampa, Fla,..... 173 141 17.4 35.3 50.8 23.B 23.3 17.6 141
St. Paul, Minn.... 177 164 39.0 36.9 45.0 29.9 12.8 11.4 507
Norfolk, Va.2...... 239 218 68.5 32.2 94.6 46.1 37.5 15.5 171
Virginia Beach, Va.*...................... 195 186 60.7 16.1 79.7 45.2 25.2 6.6 164
Rochester, N.Y... 2 9 9 285 110.0 50.0 93.7 67.8 4.8 13.5 2 2 9
Akron, Ohio....... 134 122 10.8 37.3 46.0 10.4 .1 12.2 113
St. Petersburg, Fla 103 88 12.5 18.2 29.2 14.4 12.fi 10.4 135
Corpus Chrieti, Tex............... ......... 104 7 3 ,9 23.7 31.1 18.6 11.8 30.6 82
Jersey City, N.J.. 2 3 6 2 2 6 96.0 6.8 78.3 57.9 19.7 9.0 125
Anaheim, Calif.... 149 78 10.7 8.6 30.0 8.2 19.5 71.4 126
Richmond, Va.2- 3 1 7 249 66.6 29.9 121.9 70.4 33.6 62,4 313
- Represents zero or rounds to zero,
consolidated government.
‘Includes categories not shown separately. ‘Represents, in effect, :ity-county