De verborgen gevaren van vaccinaties - WantToKnow.nl

En op basis van zulke invalide conclusies stelt men een hele jonge generatie bloot aan ellende,
terwijl de effectiviteit van het vaccin – getuige een recente JAMA-publicatie - nog bij lange na
niet vaststaat. Ik citeer een verslag van een publicatie in JAMA van 19-8-2009:
[…] At first glance, a study just published in the August 19th edition of the Journal of the
American Medical Association (JAMA) is yet another whitewash job about the safety of the
quadrivalent human papillomavirus recombinant vaccine – beter known as Gardasil, the
genital human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Licensed in June of 2006 by the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) for girls and young women betweenn the ages of nine and 26, the
enormously hyped and advertised vaccie is designed to prevent infection with fout types of
HPV: types 16 and 18 can cause cervical cancer and types 6 and 11 are the most common
types of genital warts.
The JAMA report says that the Gardasil adverse events reported have been mostly consistent
with data gathered before the vacne was considerd safe enough to be widely administered to
young girls. But a close reading shows some disturbing additional facts.
Just as Naturalnews has consistently reported, the vaccine has caused an extraordinary
number of adverse side effects. And now comes word from the JAMA report that the HPV
vaccine has unexpectedly caused episodes of fainting and life-threatening blood clots. In fact,
in a statement to the media, these events were called ‘disproportional’ – meaning these side
effects are anything but rare. What’s more, among the 12,424 adverse reaction reports about
the HPV vaccine, 772 (6.2 percent) were serious and included 32 reports of death.
Other problems caused by the vaccine include local site reactions, skin rashes, nausea,
dizziness, headaches and even Guillain-Barré syndrome (a disorder in which the body’s
immune system attacks part of the peripheral nervous system sometimes causing paralysis)
and anaphylaxis (hypersensitivity reaction that can cause sudden death). As just reported by
CBS news, the teenage daughter of physician Scott Ratner and his wife was one of the
unfortunate girls who became severely ill with a chronic autoimmune disease, myofasciitis,
after her first dose of Gardasil. Dr. Ratner told CBS his daughterwas so ill with the
neurological problem ‘she’d have been better off getting cervical cancer than the
vaccination.’
One of the lead researchers for Gardasil has also gone public this week, telling CBS news
there is no data showing that het vaccine even remains effective beyond five years. That
means that if a ten year old girl is given the vaccine and subjected to possibly serious and
even life-threatening side effects, the vaccine may offer het no protection at all when she hits
her teens or young adulthood.
What makes the debate about Gardasil crazy to begin with is that studies have shown 70 to 90
percent of people with HPV naturally clear the virus from the body within two years of
infection – with no help from drugs or vaccines. So the most effective protection from
problems caused by HPV is to avoid being infected by the multiple strains of HPV by not
engaging in promiscuous, unprotected-by-condoms sex (the virus is transmitted sexually and
condoms do not offer 100 percent protection) and by keeping your body’s immune system
strong and healthy through good nutrition, exercise and exposure to sunlight.
In an editorial accompanying the JAMA study, Charlotte Haug, M.D., Ph.D., M.Sc., of The
Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association in Oslo expressed her concerns about the
agressively promoted Gardasil vaccine: “Wether a risk is worth taking depends not only on
the absolute risk, but on the relationship between the potential risk and the potential benefit.
If the potential benefits are substantial, most individuals would be willing to accept the risks.
But the net benefit of the HPV vaccine to a woman is uncertain. Even if persistenty infected
with HPV, a woman most likely will not develop cacer if she is regularly screened…” […]
83