Hvordan virker samvirker? - Handelshøyskolen BI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989): Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review, vol.14, no.4, 532-550 Fornell, Claes (1992): A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience. Journal of Marketing, Vol 55 (Jan), 1-21. Fulton, M. (1995): The Future of Canadian Agricultural Cooperatives: A Property Rights Approach, American Journal of Agricultural Economics Gatignon, Hubert, and Xuereb, Jean-Marc (1997): Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance. Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 34, (Feb), 77-90. Gripsrud, Lenvik og Olsen (2000): Influence Activities in Agricultural Cooperatives : The Impact of Heterogenity, NILF-report 2001:2, Oslo. Han, Jin K., Kim, Namwoon,& Srivastava, Rajendra K. (1998): Marketing Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link? Journal of Marketing, vol. 62 (Oct.), 30-45. Hansmann, H. (1988): Ownership of the Firm, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, vol. 4, no.2, fall. Harris, A., Stefanson, B., Fulton, M. (1996): New generation cooperatives and cooperative theory. Journal of Cooperatives 11:15-28 Harte, L.N. (1997): Creeping Privatisation of the Irish Co-operatives in the Agro-food Industries, ed. Nilsson, J. and van Dijk Horng, Shun-Ching (1998): Market Orientation of Small and Medium-Sized Firms in Taiwan. Journal of Small Business Management (July): 79- 85 Hubert, George P. (1990): Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures, Organization Science, Vol. 2, No.1 (Feb), 88-115. Hult, G. Thomas & Ferrell, O.C. (1997): A Global Learning Organization Structure and Market Information Processing. Journal of Business Research 40: 155-166 Hunt, Shelby D. (1991): Modern Marketing Theory. Critical Issues in the Philosophy of Marketing Science, South-Western, OH. Jaworski, Bernard J., and Kohli, Ajay K. (1993): Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 (July), 53-70. Kotler, Philip (1984): Marketing Management. Analysis, Planning, Implementing and Control, Prentice-Hall,NJ Kyriakopoulos, Kyriakos (2000): The Market Orientation of Cooperative Organizations, Doctoral dissertation, Nyenrode University, Breukelen 116
Lerman, Z. og Parliament, C. (1990): Comparative Performance of Cooperatives and Investor-Owned Firms in US Food Industries, Agribusiness: An International Journal, 6 (6) Levinthal, Daniel A., and March, James G. (1993): The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, 95-112. Li, Roger, & Calantone, Roger J., (1998): The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62 (Oct.), 13-29. Lyles, Marjorie A., Schwenk, Charles R. (1992): Top Management, Strategy and Organizational Knowledge Structures. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 29: 2 (March), 156-174 Lynn, Gary S., Skov, Richard B., Abel, Kate D. (1999): Practices that Support Team Learning and Their Impact on Speed to Market and New Product Success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 16, 439-454 March, James G. (1991): Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organizatioon Science, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Feb), 71-87. McKee, Daryl (1992): An Organizational Learning Approach to Product Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management,Vol.9, 232- 245. Milgrom, P. og Roberts, J. (1992): Economics, Organization and Management. Prentice Hall International Editions. Narver, John C., & Slater, Stanley F. (1990): The Effect of Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing, (Oct), 20-35. Narver, John C., Jacobson, Robert & Slater, Stanley F. (1993): Market Orientation and Business Performance: An Analysis of Panel Data, Working paper, Marketing Science Institute, MA. Nilsson, J. (1998): The emergence of new organizational models for agricultural cooperatives. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 28 Nilsson, Jerker (1999). The Emergence of New Organizational Models for Agricultural Cooperatives, Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research, vol.28: 39-47. Norsk Landbrukssamvirke (2000).: Landbruksamvirket 2000. Årbok for landbrukets økonomiske organisasjoner, 46. årgang Ollila, P. (1989): Coordination of supply and demand in the dairy marketing system with spesial emphasis on the potential role of farmer cooperatives as coordination institutions, Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland, vol 61, no.3 Porter, Michael E. (1980): Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press 117
Page 1 and 2:
Hvordan virker samvirker? Markedsor
Page 3:
Forord Denne rapporten er et result
Page 6 and 7:
Tabeller Tabell 2.1: Faktorer som p
Page 8 and 9:
produkter hvert år, er antallet n
Page 10 and 11:
cooperatives have been interviewed.
Page 12 and 13:
markedsregulator er overlatt til sa
Page 14 and 15:
2. Salgssamvirket i landbruket som
Page 16 and 17:
Hvis det er et enkelt individ som h
Page 18 and 19:
Tabell 2.1 Faktorer som påvirker k
Page 20 and 21:
imidlertid Fulton at dette argument
Page 22 and 23:
Opportunismen får stor betydning d
Page 24 and 25:
vanskelig å få finansiert nødven
Page 26 and 27:
I Figur 2.1 hentet fra Nilsson (199
Page 28 and 29:
Tabell 2.2 Hovedtrekk ved fem model
Page 30 and 31:
investorer anbefales i det første
Page 32 and 33:
Disse fasene eller filosofiene blir
Page 34 and 35:
Jaworski (1990), som kun ser på im
Page 36 and 37:
I tillegg til å lære må en marke
Page 38 and 39:
sentralisert organisasjonsstruktur
Page 40 and 41:
1.4 Forhold mellom avdelingene 1.4.
Page 42 and 43:
at bøndene ønsker å levere stør
Page 44 and 45:
forbedringer av dagens produkter p
Page 46 and 47:
planlegging, så konseptutvikling,
Page 48 and 49:
man bør se på hva organisasjon gj
Page 50 and 51:
mindre risiko, da alternativet elle
Page 52 and 53:
Tabell 4.1: Hovedtyper av case-stud
Page 54 and 55:
Tabell 4.2: Forskningsprosess for
Page 56 and 57:
Tabell 4.3: Sammenheng mellom teore
Page 58 and 59:
Trinn 7: Litteraturstøtte Ved teor
Page 60 and 61:
effektivitet innenfor produksjon og
Page 62 and 63:
Tabell 5.1: Produktlanseringer i TI
Page 64 and 65:
1998 • TINE Fersk Rømmedressing,
Page 66 and 67: over (1-2%). Disse avdelingen er ik
Page 68 and 69: "Noen ganger har TINE oppført seg
Page 70 and 71: 5.3.10 Hva får TINE ut av sin sats
Page 73 and 74: 6. Norsk Kjøtt 6.1 Introduksjon om
Page 75 and 76: Av de lanserte produktene i 1998 er
Page 77 and 78: Teknologidrevet produktutvikling vi
Page 79 and 80: viktig. Deres inntrykk er at de som
Page 81: I tillegg til de forholdene som er
Page 84 and 85: skiller seg fra kjøtt- og meierisa
Page 86 and 87: 1995 Radikalt nytt produkt Forandri
Page 88 and 89: Disse gruppene skal følge prosjekt
Page 90 and 91: Prior gjennomfører ikke alltid tes
Page 92 and 93: kan forklares med at Prior har funn
Page 95 and 96: 8. En sammenligning av organisasjon
Page 97 and 98: opptatt av å få omsetning på sit
Page 99 and 100: Tabell 8.1 Sammenligning av organis
Page 101 and 102: med en innstilling til Styringsgrup
Page 105 and 106: Prior Norge Prior lanseres relativt
Page 109 and 110: 9. Sammendrag og diskusjon Formåle
Page 111 and 112: henger sammen med at denne modellen
Page 113 and 114: Sannsynligvis har rollen som marked
Page 115: 10. Litteraturliste Adams, Marjorie
Page 119 and 120: Vi har hatt samtaler med: TINE Nors
Page 121 and 122: Vedlegg 1: Intervjumal Produktutvik
Page 123: 4. Hva får bedriften ut av sin sat
show all

Hvordan virker samvirker? - Handelshøyskolen BI

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?