22.02.2013 Views

book1

book1

book1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Minimum standards for crea� on of partnership should be ensured, off ering<br />

benchmarks on ways to engage local partners and local communi� es in<br />

a transparent and eff ec� ve ways, including their selec� on and working<br />

modali� es. (The standards will bring together the exis� ng frameworks<br />

within AIN, NGO Federa� on etc like the diff erent partnership guidelines).<br />

Under this framework, the civil society organiza� ons, both na� onal and<br />

interna� onal will voluntary decide to adhere to certain standards to be<br />

observed and prac� ced while suppor� ng or implemen� ng the delivery of<br />

social-economic ac� vi� es for the benefi t of the benefi ciaries. The agreed<br />

minimum standards will not only be complementary and respec� ul of<br />

the exis� ng legal provisions but also will help the GoN to be� er ensure<br />

development outcomes according to the na� onal priori� es.<br />

How to achieve it?<br />

A Na� onal and regional level dialogue could be ini� ated in order to collect<br />

ideas, analyze current concerns and bo� leneck. As part of the consulta� on<br />

process, a series of Accountability Forums (at least one at central level<br />

and one in each development region) could be held where district level<br />

authori� es, representa� ves of non state actors will discuss ways to improve<br />

their working rela� onships. A fi nal central level dissemina� on mee� ng<br />

would be held, off ering the engaged par� es and broader stakeholders a<br />

forum for discussion. From this point onwards, a working group could be<br />

created with the aims of short lis� ng the most important proposi� ons based<br />

on the principle of “doability” and prac� cality.<br />

The selected proposi� ons will be reformulated as a set of standards<br />

that will lead to the formula� on of the Na� onal Compact on Grass Root<br />

Aid Eff ec� veness to be offi cially endorsed by the engaged par� es. Are the<br />

condi� ons ripe for such level of ini� a� ve in Nepal? Are the na� onal civil<br />

society and interna� onal aid community, especially interna� onal non state<br />

actors ready to go the extra mile in order to have be� er aid implementa� on<br />

and consequen� ally being able to achieve be� er outcomes?<br />

Undoubtedly, lots of awareness should be promoted in order to meet the<br />

condi� ons for se� ng up this process and at the same � me the case for be� er<br />

aid at local level should be promoted by external development partners who<br />

can push so� ly the interna� onal and na� onal non state actors in embracing<br />

the case for aid accountability at local level. As we saw before, the current<br />

discussions leading to Busang clearly iden� fy the role of ins� tu� onal donors<br />

in encouraging a more accountability conducive framework. In this way<br />

interna� onal and na� onal civil society start feeling a certain level of urgency<br />

in making their work be� er and more accountable.<br />

Towards a CSO Nepal Aid Eff ec� veness Forum?<br />

Given the diff erent nature of actors, na� onal, local, grassroots and<br />

interna� onal involved in the implementa� on of aid in Nepal, a new innova� ve<br />

forum could be promoted in order to ini� ate the na� onal process leading to<br />

86<br />

Changing paradigms of aid eff ec� veness in Nepal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!