book1
book1
book1
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Minimum standards for crea� on of partnership should be ensured, off ering<br />
benchmarks on ways to engage local partners and local communi� es in<br />
a transparent and eff ec� ve ways, including their selec� on and working<br />
modali� es. (The standards will bring together the exis� ng frameworks<br />
within AIN, NGO Federa� on etc like the diff erent partnership guidelines).<br />
Under this framework, the civil society organiza� ons, both na� onal and<br />
interna� onal will voluntary decide to adhere to certain standards to be<br />
observed and prac� ced while suppor� ng or implemen� ng the delivery of<br />
social-economic ac� vi� es for the benefi t of the benefi ciaries. The agreed<br />
minimum standards will not only be complementary and respec� ul of<br />
the exis� ng legal provisions but also will help the GoN to be� er ensure<br />
development outcomes according to the na� onal priori� es.<br />
How to achieve it?<br />
A Na� onal and regional level dialogue could be ini� ated in order to collect<br />
ideas, analyze current concerns and bo� leneck. As part of the consulta� on<br />
process, a series of Accountability Forums (at least one at central level<br />
and one in each development region) could be held where district level<br />
authori� es, representa� ves of non state actors will discuss ways to improve<br />
their working rela� onships. A fi nal central level dissemina� on mee� ng<br />
would be held, off ering the engaged par� es and broader stakeholders a<br />
forum for discussion. From this point onwards, a working group could be<br />
created with the aims of short lis� ng the most important proposi� ons based<br />
on the principle of “doability” and prac� cality.<br />
The selected proposi� ons will be reformulated as a set of standards<br />
that will lead to the formula� on of the Na� onal Compact on Grass Root<br />
Aid Eff ec� veness to be offi cially endorsed by the engaged par� es. Are the<br />
condi� ons ripe for such level of ini� a� ve in Nepal? Are the na� onal civil<br />
society and interna� onal aid community, especially interna� onal non state<br />
actors ready to go the extra mile in order to have be� er aid implementa� on<br />
and consequen� ally being able to achieve be� er outcomes?<br />
Undoubtedly, lots of awareness should be promoted in order to meet the<br />
condi� ons for se� ng up this process and at the same � me the case for be� er<br />
aid at local level should be promoted by external development partners who<br />
can push so� ly the interna� onal and na� onal non state actors in embracing<br />
the case for aid accountability at local level. As we saw before, the current<br />
discussions leading to Busang clearly iden� fy the role of ins� tu� onal donors<br />
in encouraging a more accountability conducive framework. In this way<br />
interna� onal and na� onal civil society start feeling a certain level of urgency<br />
in making their work be� er and more accountable.<br />
Towards a CSO Nepal Aid Eff ec� veness Forum?<br />
Given the diff erent nature of actors, na� onal, local, grassroots and<br />
interna� onal involved in the implementa� on of aid in Nepal, a new innova� ve<br />
forum could be promoted in order to ini� ate the na� onal process leading to<br />
86<br />
Changing paradigms of aid eff ec� veness in Nepal