book1
book1
book1
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
udge� ng process. When gender quality and priori� es are not adequately<br />
mainstreamed in the na� onal development plans and the budgets, donors’<br />
own gender equality priority becomes ineff ec� ve. The Paris Declara� on<br />
iden� fi es twelve monitoring indicators for measuring public fi nancial<br />
management, accoun� ng and audi� ng systems, procurement systems,<br />
results frameworks, transparency and capacity. But none of the assessment<br />
tools incorporated elements to monitor gender and social equity. The<br />
limita� on of system was acknowledged by UNIFEM, the DAC Network and<br />
CSOs over world and since 2010 new gender dimensions has been added<br />
to the monitoring formats. The 50 th UN Commission on Status of women<br />
adopted “Financing of Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women” and<br />
Nepal is obligated to it and it has introduced GRB since the FY 2007/08. This<br />
was preceded by a series of Gender Budget Audit (GBA) of several sectors.<br />
Therea� er, a new system of budget classifi ca� on was introduced, with<br />
specifi c focus on 13 ministries.<br />
With Aid Eff ec� veness agenda Gender Budget Audit and Gender<br />
Responsiveness acquired new importance for gender mainstreaming into the<br />
mechanism and instruments used in planning and managing development<br />
programs. Under Nepal’s GRB guidelines, each proposed program has to be<br />
scored in accordance with indicators developed by the Gender Responsive<br />
Budget Commi� ee (GRBC) led by Ministry of Finance. Programs scoring 50<br />
percent marks or more are classifi ed as “directly responsive,” those scoring<br />
20 to 50 percent as “indirectly responsive” and those scoring less than<br />
20 percent as “neutral.” The alloca� on to directly and indirectly gender<br />
responsive programs has been increasing slowly.<br />
But Nepal’s GRB system has encountered diffi cul� es in implementa� on<br />
because of conceptual and prac� cal capacity problems. She, therefore,<br />
suggests that the scoring methodology does not mesh with indicators used<br />
in diff erent sectors and so has not been applied systema� cally. Nepal’s<br />
GRB system needs to encompass the complete budget cycle and include<br />
detail assessments of each with respect to transforma� ve, adequacy, nondiscriminatory<br />
and monitoring system. Another big challenge to make GRB<br />
opera� onal is training and capacity building of the Gender Focal Points in all<br />
ministries, planning units in government and local bodies. The focus of GRB<br />
has to be broadened from so� sectors like agriculture, health, educa� on, etc<br />
to other relevant sectors like law, home, police etc. It is equally crucial that<br />
all economic policies are to be fi ltered through gender and social inclusion<br />
lenses.<br />
Dr Tim Cadman and Dr Tek Maraseni discuss “Governing Emissions<br />
Reduc� on: REDD+ and Stakeholder Percep� ons of Ins� tu� onal Legi� macy.”<br />
They argue that there exist varied percep� ons of ins� tu� onal governance<br />
greatly across the sectors and regions, but respondents from the global<br />
South rate the mechanism higher than those in the North, irrespec� ve of<br />
their sector with implica� ons for the current design and future direc� ons in<br />
market-based approaches to climate change management. The globaliza� on<br />
of poli� cs has led to a commensurate growth of global governance.<br />
XX