22.02.2013 Views

book1

book1

book1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 2 summarises the perceived eff ects of food aid based on a trendanalysis.<br />

without FFW with FFW<br />

food suffi ciency 00 0000<br />

well-being 00 0000<br />

sale of assets 0000 00<br />

exploita� on of natural<br />

resources<br />

0000 00<br />

� me spend for<br />

employment<br />

0000 00<br />

need for mutual help in<br />

village<br />

0000 00<br />

confi llcts in society 000 000<br />

par� cipa� on in<br />

community works*<br />

00 00000<br />

migra� on 0000 00<br />

educa� on (children) 000 00<br />

Figure 2: Trend analysis presen� ng the results of a community discussion.<br />

Summarising, the fi ndings of the study suggests, that food assistance<br />

through FFW does help people securing their assets during crises, and increase<br />

their overall feeling of well-being and security. Contrary to the assump� on<br />

that food assistance would result in the decline of recipients’ ability to deal<br />

with shocks, the fi ndings show that food assistance does not replace other<br />

mechanisms of food acquirement but that it rather is an addi� onal source<br />

of food on which people can rely in the short-term. It therefore does not<br />

replace but combine tradi� onal sources of food. However, these posi� ve<br />

eff ects of food assistance only prevail in the short-term. Neither prior nor<br />

a� er the distribu� on of food assistance does it provide addi� onal security to<br />

poten� al recipients. This is mainly due to two reasons: on the one hand, FFW<br />

is not reliable and transparent enough to enable people to readily rely on it<br />

and adapt their livelihood strategies; on the other hand, its developmental<br />

contribu� ons, e.g. through the construc� on of small-scale infrastructures,<br />

are not regarded as long-las� ng and sustainable by the villagers. Instead of<br />

building the village path, or improving the school building, villagers would<br />

prefer to be given skills-training and other employment genera� ng ac� vi� es.<br />

Addi� onally, the VDC secretary cri� cised the lack of coordina� on between<br />

his offi ce and the WFP. Finally, what villagers needed most was a water<br />

pipe, which could not be constructed due to limited resources for non-food<br />

items on side of the WFP. Therefore, instead of contribu� ng to a longer-term<br />

improvement of the situa� on in the village, food assistance rather helped<br />

to sustain the status-quo, preven� ng villagers from slipping further into<br />

Changing paradigms of aid eff ec� veness in Nepal 153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!