22.02.2013 Views

book1

book1

book1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

used in planning and managing general budget support (GBS) and programs<br />

with SWAps. The 50th session of the UN Commission on Status of Women<br />

adopted "Financing of Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women” as its<br />

priority theme for 2008. Nepal is obligated to include fi nancing informa� on<br />

in its report to the global body and Nepal has introduced GRB since the FY<br />

2007/08.<br />

Gender Budget Audit (GBA) relates to examina� on of the budgetary<br />

and taxa� on policies, expenditure pa� erns, budgetary processes and<br />

mechanisms through a gender lens. Gender Responsive Budge� ng (GRB)<br />

involves ensuring that all these budgetary policies, ac� vi� es and processes<br />

1) do not impact adversely on women; 2) take into account women’s interest;<br />

3) involve women in planning and implementa� on of budgets and that; 4)<br />

adequate resources are allocated for ensuring gender equality goals. GRB is<br />

not about formula� ng a separate budget for women.<br />

Gender Responsive Budget (GRB) exercises are expected to: 1) hold<br />

governments accountable for their commitments to gender equality and<br />

women’s rights, and (2) ensure that progress on gender mainstreaming in the<br />

development programs is monitored as part of the regular annual budge� ng<br />

process. One of the major defi ciencies in gender mainstreaming eff orts in<br />

Nepal has been lack of monitoring mechanisms and regular monitoring on<br />

gender aspects of development programs (UNFPA, 2007) .<br />

Nepal began Gender Responsive Budge� ng (GRB) exercises from<br />

fi scal year 2007/08. This was preceded by a series of gender and gender<br />

budget audits (GBA) of several sectors. Therea� er a new system of budget<br />

classifi ca� on was introduced, which in principle applies throughout the<br />

government, star� ng with specifi c focus on 13 ministries.<br />

The GRB concept emerged from women's experience in the 1980s and<br />

1990s, when the resources for social programs were cut widely following<br />

the policy dictates of the Washington Consensus (Folbre, 2001). At about<br />

this � me there was emerging consensus that slow progress for women was<br />

in part due to lack of resources for gender equality programs. The Beijing<br />

Pla� orm for Ac� on (BPfA) (1995) advocated intensifi ca� on of gender<br />

mainstreaming eff orts with par� cular emphasis on government budgets. But<br />

change was slow. Reviews of the Beijing Pla� orm (UNIFEM, 2002 and 2005)<br />

showed that commitments to gender equality – including the BPfA, CEDAW<br />

and UN Security Council Resolu� on 1325 – were not matched fi nancially by<br />

either na� onal budgets or offi cial development assistance (UNIFEM, 2002<br />

and 2005). A study by the Associa� on of Women's Rights in Development<br />

(2005) showed that only 0.6 percent of foreign aid had gender equality as<br />

its major objec� ve.<br />

Under Nepal’s GRB guidelines, each proposed program has to be scored<br />

in accordance with indicators developed by the Gender Responsive Budget<br />

Commi� ee (GRBC) which is led by the Ministry of Finance. These indicators<br />

of the gender sensi� vity of diff erent ac� vi� es/expenditure lines are: 1)<br />

par� cipa� on in decision making roles and programme planning, 2) capacity<br />

98<br />

Changing paradigms of aid eff ec� veness in Nepal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!