22.02.2013 Views

book1

book1

book1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

fi nancial support in the forestry sector. Role of donors in forestry has been<br />

signifi cant but the impact mixed. Community forestry programme, for<br />

example, has been remarkably successful in terms of its tangible impact on<br />

environmental conserva� on; however impact on biodiversity and watershed<br />

management has been mixed. There has been limited support in private<br />

forestry, non-� mber forest products, wood based industries and research<br />

sector leaving very li� le or no impact.<br />

Table 6.1: Foreign Aid contribu� ons to forestry sector a� er 1990<br />

Donor<br />

116<br />

Dura� on<br />

(approx.<br />

years)<br />

Approx.<br />

amount<br />

in US$<br />

million<br />

Changing paradigms of aid eff ec� veness in Nepal<br />

Average<br />

budget/yr in<br />

US $ million<br />

Sub sector<br />

UK > 20 years 53.6 2.68 Community forestry<br />

Switzerland > 20 years 20.0 1.00 Community forestry<br />

Denmark > 5 years 20.2 4.05 Community forestry<br />

Australia > 10 years 17.6 1.76 Community forestry<br />

USA through CARE/N > 10 years 11.5 1.05 Community forestry<br />

USA through WWF/N > 20 years 21.2 1.06 Biodiversity<br />

Germany > 5 years 5.0 1.00 Community forestry<br />

IFAD > 10 years 13.7 1.37 Leasehold forestry<br />

The Netherlands<br />

through SNV<br />

> 5 years 6.0 1.21 Collabora� ve forestry<br />

EU > 5 years 18.7 3.75 Watershed<br />

Japan > 5 years 0.7 0.14 Watershed<br />

UNDP and FAO > 10 years 2.6 0.26 Biodiversity<br />

Total 190.8 19 .27<br />

Source: Adapted from Pokharel et al., 2008<br />

Swiss government, for example, through its project has spent about NRs<br />

7.5 million per year on regular government (“red book”) ac� vi� es in three<br />

districts. It spent an addi� onal NRs 5.6 million per year on various capacity<br />

building and fi eld level ac� vi� es through direct funding in human resource<br />

development (trainings, workshops, long term scholarships MSc, B.Sc, ISc<br />

scholarships 1 etc.) to GON staff and community members. This is equivalent<br />

to NRs 4.37 million per district, or NRs18600 per community group. It is<br />

es� mated that 52 percent of this government “red book” ac� vity expenditure<br />

is on infrastructure, vehicle running and other recurrent ac� vi� es.<br />

1. Support to pre and post SLC scholarships for community members is also provided but not<br />

included in this calcula� on.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!