book1
book1
book1
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 1: Sectoral Alloca� on of Foreign Aid (1990-2007)<br />
Rs. In million<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
1990\91<br />
1991\92<br />
1992\93<br />
1993\94<br />
1994\95<br />
1995\96<br />
1996\97<br />
1997\98<br />
1998\99<br />
1999\00<br />
2000\01<br />
2001\02<br />
2002\03<br />
2003\04<br />
2004\05<br />
2005\06<br />
2006\07<br />
2007\08<br />
Source: Calculated from Economic Survey 2003/04 and 2008/09, MoF<br />
Agriculture, Irriga� on and<br />
Forestry Sector<br />
Transport, power and<br />
communica� on<br />
Industry and commerce sector<br />
Social services sector<br />
Other Sector<br />
During early 90s, Nepal received sizeable foreign aid in transport, power<br />
and communica� on followed by industry and commerce; and agriculture.<br />
A year a� er Nepal implemented the eighth fi ve year plan in 1992, the<br />
agriculture sector received highest share of foreign aid. However, this trend<br />
discon� nued following years and again, transport, power and communica� on<br />
sector con� nued to receive highest share of foreign aid fl ow in Nepal. This<br />
shows a divergence between Na� onal plan’s priority and actual areas of<br />
funding. Nepal con� nued to receive a larger share, though declining, on<br />
transport, power and communica� on up to FY 2003/04. Trend reveals that<br />
social sector has been fi nanced with its increasing share over the year right<br />
from early 1990s up � ll now. A� er 2003/04, social sector has been receiving<br />
a highest share of foreign aid in Nepal. The industry and commerce sector<br />
has been receiving a nominal share of foreign aid in recent years.<br />
While Nepal had diff erent policy priori� es at diff erent Na� onal Plans,<br />
there are no one-to-one correspondence between policy priori� es and<br />
areas with higher investment. This is not only an isolated case of na� onal<br />
expenditure on less priori� zed areas through domes� c source of fi nancing<br />
expenditure; rather the same goes with foreign aid. For example, despite<br />
major poverty thrust given during the Eighth and Ninth Plan period, the<br />
external resource alloca� on as outlined above does not demonstrate strong<br />
linkage between focused priority and resource alloca� on. The total resource<br />
fl ow during the period of 1990 to 1998 in the basic social services sectors,<br />
which includes primary schooling, drinking water and sanita� on, primary<br />
health, and family planning, has increased on an average annual rate of 11.4<br />
percent.<br />
However, the total volume of aid is found to be inadequate to address<br />
the poverty reduc� on objec� ve. During the same period, an average annual<br />
rate of increase in the educa� on sector remained 5.3 percent. In the year<br />
Changing paradigms of aid eff ec� veness in Nepal 43