22.02.2013 Views

book1

book1

book1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 1: Sectoral Alloca� on of Foreign Aid (1990-2007)<br />

Rs. In million<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

1990\91<br />

1991\92<br />

1992\93<br />

1993\94<br />

1994\95<br />

1995\96<br />

1996\97<br />

1997\98<br />

1998\99<br />

1999\00<br />

2000\01<br />

2001\02<br />

2002\03<br />

2003\04<br />

2004\05<br />

2005\06<br />

2006\07<br />

2007\08<br />

Source: Calculated from Economic Survey 2003/04 and 2008/09, MoF<br />

Agriculture, Irriga� on and<br />

Forestry Sector<br />

Transport, power and<br />

communica� on<br />

Industry and commerce sector<br />

Social services sector<br />

Other Sector<br />

During early 90s, Nepal received sizeable foreign aid in transport, power<br />

and communica� on followed by industry and commerce; and agriculture.<br />

A year a� er Nepal implemented the eighth fi ve year plan in 1992, the<br />

agriculture sector received highest share of foreign aid. However, this trend<br />

discon� nued following years and again, transport, power and communica� on<br />

sector con� nued to receive highest share of foreign aid fl ow in Nepal. This<br />

shows a divergence between Na� onal plan’s priority and actual areas of<br />

funding. Nepal con� nued to receive a larger share, though declining, on<br />

transport, power and communica� on up to FY 2003/04. Trend reveals that<br />

social sector has been fi nanced with its increasing share over the year right<br />

from early 1990s up � ll now. A� er 2003/04, social sector has been receiving<br />

a highest share of foreign aid in Nepal. The industry and commerce sector<br />

has been receiving a nominal share of foreign aid in recent years.<br />

While Nepal had diff erent policy priori� es at diff erent Na� onal Plans,<br />

there are no one-to-one correspondence between policy priori� es and<br />

areas with higher investment. This is not only an isolated case of na� onal<br />

expenditure on less priori� zed areas through domes� c source of fi nancing<br />

expenditure; rather the same goes with foreign aid. For example, despite<br />

major poverty thrust given during the Eighth and Ninth Plan period, the<br />

external resource alloca� on as outlined above does not demonstrate strong<br />

linkage between focused priority and resource alloca� on. The total resource<br />

fl ow during the period of 1990 to 1998 in the basic social services sectors,<br />

which includes primary schooling, drinking water and sanita� on, primary<br />

health, and family planning, has increased on an average annual rate of 11.4<br />

percent.<br />

However, the total volume of aid is found to be inadequate to address<br />

the poverty reduc� on objec� ve. During the same period, an average annual<br />

rate of increase in the educa� on sector remained 5.3 percent. In the year<br />

Changing paradigms of aid eff ec� veness in Nepal 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!