22.02.2013 Views

book1

book1

book1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

demands capacity building in the government on project iden� fi ca� on and<br />

priori� za� on, cost es� ma� on and speedy implementa� on.<br />

Foreign Aid and the Na� onal Economy<br />

This sec� on refl ects on the structural evolu� on of the Nepali economy<br />

over the various poli� cal phases. While doing so, it will also look into the<br />

sectoral growth pa� erns and trends. Given the dominance of agriculture in<br />

employment and the na� onal output, it will make a compara� ve assessment<br />

of the budget outlays made on agriculture vis-à-vis non-agricultural sectors.<br />

Similar comparison will be made of total aid disbursement on agriculture<br />

and non-agricultural sectors. Finally, as the theme of the paper is foreign aid,<br />

it will compare the stock of domes� c and foreign loan and also the annual<br />

fl ows of ODA and its component with the GDP.<br />

There has been a sharp decline in the share of agriculture in the aggregate<br />

GDP over the years. It declined from nearly half in the last fi ve years of the P<br />

era to nearly 42 percent in the PD era. It dropped slightly to two-fi � h in the<br />

LIC years. It further dropped to 36.7 percent in HIC and to 34.2 percent in the<br />

PT years. A close look of table 3.1 reveals a clear cut pa� ern of a sharper drop<br />

from P to PD and from LIC to HIC. Let us fi rst look into high drop years. From<br />

P to PD marks a regime shi� . De-licenseing, decontrol, deregula� on and<br />

priva� za� on of economic ac� vi� es a� er the restora� on of the mul� -party<br />

democracy in the early 1990s enhanced the spectrum of private investment<br />

par� cularly in non-agricultural ac� vi� es. Rela� vely larger gains in NAGDP<br />

occur in PD and HIC. When the confl ict turned violent, agriculture sector bore<br />

the full brunt of it. First, the well-to-do rural households were threatened<br />

with confi sca� on of their property, extor� on, kidnapping and even murder.<br />

They fl ed to safety from confl ict-torn villages. This had disastrous impact not<br />

only on agriculture, but the en� re rural economy. Second, both the rebel<br />

and the government launched recruitment drive in their respec� ve security<br />

forces. This squeezed the supply of farm workers. Third, the young boys and<br />

girls from poor rural households found new employment opportuni� es in<br />

the oil-rich gulf countries and Malaysia. This further squeezed the supply of<br />

farm labour. Fourth, right from the restora� on of the mul� -party democracy,<br />

agriculture and rural sector completely lost the patronage and support from<br />

the government.<br />

Thus, what emerges as conclusion is the fact that a sharp or a mild drop<br />

in the output share of agriculture is a direct func� on of the extent of shock.<br />

The massive the shock the larger the drop, and the milder the shock milder<br />

the drop! This explains a faster pace of non-agriculturiza� on in PD and HIC,<br />

and a slower pace in LIC and PT.<br />

Changing paradigms of aid eff ec� veness in Nepal 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!