book1
book1
book1
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
kg rice per month. In addi� on, the NFC supplies subsidised rice to state-<br />
and NGO-employees through a quota system, allowing for more reliable<br />
distribu� on of this source of food for those working in these ins� tu� ons.<br />
Other villagers – in comparison – o� en have to wait for days in order to be<br />
given some rice by the NFC under the ward system.<br />
In comparison to those working in NGOs or governmental jobs, worseoff<br />
households o� en engage in irregular unskilled daily wage labour and<br />
thus earn less. This includes skilled or unskilled labour such as house<br />
construc� on, carpe� ng, portering, livestock farming or sale of herbs. A<br />
common form of employment is the so called baure kaam, a socially less<br />
valued work on other people’s fi elds. This also includes the carrying and<br />
breaking of stones or sand and was regarded as an unpopular strategy<br />
by the villagers. As these income sources are rather unreliable, members<br />
of the worse-off wealth group depend more on networks of mutual help<br />
with other villages, the extended family or friends. Among such networks<br />
is the lagi-lagitya system, a tradi� onal patron-client rela� onship where the<br />
lagitya (a member of the Lawad caste) provides services, mostly in terms<br />
of handicra� s – to one or more lagis, higher-caste members from diff erent<br />
villages that provide a small amount of food in exchange. This system –<br />
however – was not regarded as an important source of food due to the small<br />
amounts provided. Another form of tradi� onal exchange is besaya. This<br />
includes the purchase and exchange of food in lower places of the region<br />
(e.g. Jumla, Sinja), or from other villages, meaning that villagers have to leave<br />
their home for several days in order to bring (and carry) food. However, this<br />
source of food was not regarded as important because the food obtained<br />
was only suffi cient for about two weeks of a year. Further, it was regarded as<br />
diffi cult to organize food from places as far away because one has to carry<br />
it. Some elder members of the Chhetri group also men� oned that going for<br />
besaya was regarded as a strategy which only lower-caste members of the<br />
village employed, sugges� ng its low social value. However, members of the<br />
two worse-off wealth groups spend about 10 percent of their income on<br />
food purchased through besaya in the month previous the interviews.<br />
Interes� ngly, a huge amount of money (about 40 percent of food<br />
expenditure of the worse-off group) was spent on the purchase of WFP rice,<br />
which had been intended for distribu� on to other more remote villages. Due<br />
to a lack of transporta� on in the summer months (when mules are on the<br />
high pastures), however, these recipients decide to sell their rice for a lower<br />
rate compared to the market price, instead of transpor� ng it home, so that<br />
those villagers of the study village, which is closer to the airport, could profi t<br />
from food assistance, although they had not directly been targeted by the<br />
programme in that � me.<br />
Another important source of food for the worse-off group is wild crops,<br />
refl ec� ng the need to depend on freely available sources of food. The<br />
importance assigned to wild crops increased from the be� er- to the worseoff<br />
wealth group.<br />
A common strategy among the two worse-off wealth groups is also<br />
Changing paradigms of aid eff ec� veness in Nepal 147