Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE BATTLE FOR CHINA’ S PAST<br />
China. However, Lin Ke et al do present original documentation as<br />
evidence. There is an entry in <strong>Mao</strong>’s medical record signed by Li which<br />
shows that Li took over <strong>the</strong> responsibility <strong>for</strong> looking after <strong>Mao</strong>’s<br />
health on 3 June 1957. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re is no original documentation<br />
in Li’s book that unambiguously shows that Li was <strong>Mao</strong>’s doctor<br />
be<strong>for</strong>e 1957. In <strong>the</strong> book <strong>the</strong>re are only two pictures of Li dated be<strong>for</strong>e<br />
1957. One is of him st<strong>and</strong>ing alone at <strong>the</strong> Zhongnanhai compound<br />
(where some CCP leaders lived) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r shows him swimming<br />
with two people. The caption of <strong>the</strong> swimming picture claims that Li is<br />
swimming with <strong>Mao</strong>, but <strong>Mao</strong> is not in <strong>the</strong> picture.<br />
Wu Xujun, who was <strong>Mao</strong>’s chief nurse (hushi zhang), argues <strong>the</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r photo also makes a false claim. The caption of that photo claims<br />
that it was taken at <strong>Mao</strong>’s residence. In fact, as is shown by <strong>the</strong> background<br />
wall in <strong>the</strong> photo, <strong>the</strong> photo was taken at a clinic where Li<br />
worked, which was far from <strong>Mao</strong>’s residence (Lin Ke et al 1995: 146–7).<br />
Wu points out that more than 180 pages of Li’s memoirs are devoted to<br />
Li’s so-called eyewitness account of China <strong>and</strong> <strong>Mao</strong> during <strong>the</strong> years<br />
between 1954 <strong>and</strong> 1957, but during those years Li was not even <strong>Mao</strong>’s<br />
general practitioner (Lin Ke et el 1995: 150).<br />
How much did <strong>the</strong> doctor know?<br />
Lin Ke et al also point out Li’s mistaken claim that he had found <strong>Mao</strong><br />
to be infertile. To affirm that Li was wrong about <strong>Mao</strong>’s infertility Li Ke<br />
et al interviewed Professor Wu Jieping, a medial authority who looked<br />
after <strong>Mao</strong> (Wu was alive when Li Ke et al was published). Yet Li was a<br />
doctor; how could he make such a mistake? The reason, according to<br />
Lin Ke et al, is that <strong>the</strong> book has to say somehow that <strong>Mao</strong> was infertile.<br />
O<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong> book has to answer <strong>the</strong> inevitable question of where<br />
<strong>Mao</strong>’s illegitimate children are since <strong>the</strong> book claims that <strong>Mao</strong> had<br />
slept with so many women.<br />
In order to get Li to ‘reveal’ all <strong>the</strong> important political events about<br />
which Li knew nothing or could not care less, <strong>the</strong> English version<br />
added incidents in which Li was present at many exclusive party meetings<br />
including even <strong>the</strong> CCP Politburo St<strong>and</strong>ing Committee meetings.<br />
It is claimed that Li was present when <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Revolution</strong> Small<br />
Group meeting took place in Wuhan on 8 February 1967. But Lin Ke et<br />
al (1995) argue that it was impossible <strong>for</strong> Li to have been present at all<br />
<strong>the</strong>se meetings because that was against CCP party discipline <strong>and</strong><br />
regulations. Lin Ke himself, who was much closer to <strong>Mao</strong> in political<br />
<strong>and</strong> policy issues, was not able to attend meetings at this level.<br />
Lin Ke et al point out that personnel such as nurses, bodyguards<br />
or secretaries who worked with <strong>Mao</strong> <strong>and</strong> had <strong>Mao</strong>’s trust all have<br />
some personal memento from <strong>Mao</strong>, like his notes, instructions, letters<br />
[ 104 ]