26.02.2013 Views

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE BATTLE FOR CHINA’ S PAST<br />

China. However, Lin Ke et al do present original documentation as<br />

evidence. There is an entry in <strong>Mao</strong>’s medical record signed by Li which<br />

shows that Li took over <strong>the</strong> responsibility <strong>for</strong> looking after <strong>Mao</strong>’s<br />

health on 3 June 1957. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re is no original documentation<br />

in Li’s book that unambiguously shows that Li was <strong>Mao</strong>’s doctor<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e 1957. In <strong>the</strong> book <strong>the</strong>re are only two pictures of Li dated be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

1957. One is of him st<strong>and</strong>ing alone at <strong>the</strong> Zhongnanhai compound<br />

(where some CCP leaders lived) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r shows him swimming<br />

with two people. The caption of <strong>the</strong> swimming picture claims that Li is<br />

swimming with <strong>Mao</strong>, but <strong>Mao</strong> is not in <strong>the</strong> picture.<br />

Wu Xujun, who was <strong>Mao</strong>’s chief nurse (hushi zhang), argues <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r photo also makes a false claim. The caption of that photo claims<br />

that it was taken at <strong>Mao</strong>’s residence. In fact, as is shown by <strong>the</strong> background<br />

wall in <strong>the</strong> photo, <strong>the</strong> photo was taken at a clinic where Li<br />

worked, which was far from <strong>Mao</strong>’s residence (Lin Ke et al 1995: 146–7).<br />

Wu points out that more than 180 pages of Li’s memoirs are devoted to<br />

Li’s so-called eyewitness account of China <strong>and</strong> <strong>Mao</strong> during <strong>the</strong> years<br />

between 1954 <strong>and</strong> 1957, but during those years Li was not even <strong>Mao</strong>’s<br />

general practitioner (Lin Ke et el 1995: 150).<br />

How much did <strong>the</strong> doctor know?<br />

Lin Ke et al also point out Li’s mistaken claim that he had found <strong>Mao</strong><br />

to be infertile. To affirm that Li was wrong about <strong>Mao</strong>’s infertility Li Ke<br />

et al interviewed Professor Wu Jieping, a medial authority who looked<br />

after <strong>Mao</strong> (Wu was alive when Li Ke et al was published). Yet Li was a<br />

doctor; how could he make such a mistake? The reason, according to<br />

Lin Ke et al, is that <strong>the</strong> book has to say somehow that <strong>Mao</strong> was infertile.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong> book has to answer <strong>the</strong> inevitable question of where<br />

<strong>Mao</strong>’s illegitimate children are since <strong>the</strong> book claims that <strong>Mao</strong> had<br />

slept with so many women.<br />

In order to get Li to ‘reveal’ all <strong>the</strong> important political events about<br />

which Li knew nothing or could not care less, <strong>the</strong> English version<br />

added incidents in which Li was present at many exclusive party meetings<br />

including even <strong>the</strong> CCP Politburo St<strong>and</strong>ing Committee meetings.<br />

It is claimed that Li was present when <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Revolution</strong> Small<br />

Group meeting took place in Wuhan on 8 February 1967. But Lin Ke et<br />

al (1995) argue that it was impossible <strong>for</strong> Li to have been present at all<br />

<strong>the</strong>se meetings because that was against CCP party discipline <strong>and</strong><br />

regulations. Lin Ke himself, who was much closer to <strong>Mao</strong> in political<br />

<strong>and</strong> policy issues, was not able to attend meetings at this level.<br />

Lin Ke et al point out that personnel such as nurses, bodyguards<br />

or secretaries who worked with <strong>Mao</strong> <strong>and</strong> had <strong>Mao</strong>’s trust all have<br />

some personal memento from <strong>Mao</strong>, like his notes, instructions, letters<br />

[ 104 ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!