26.02.2013 Views

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE BATTLE FOR CHINA’ S PAST<br />

persecuted <strong>and</strong> humiliated; but he died of a natural death (though he<br />

might have lived longer had he not suffered <strong>the</strong> strain of persecution).<br />

Chang <strong>and</strong> Halliday have to admit that it was <strong>Mao</strong> who rejected a<br />

report recommending <strong>the</strong> execution of Liu Shaoqi’s wife. In order to<br />

twist this fact in <strong>the</strong>ir favour Chang <strong>and</strong> Halliday make a claim that<br />

would be comic if it were not <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that it was about life <strong>and</strong><br />

death: that <strong>Mao</strong> wanted Liu <strong>and</strong> his wife Wang Guangmei’s slow death<br />

by torture. So slow that Wang was still alive in <strong>the</strong> twenty-first century.<br />

In 2004 Wang even celebrated <strong>Mao</strong>’s birthday with <strong>the</strong> latter’s relatives<br />

(Kong Dongmei 2006). The meeting was called by Wang herself <strong>and</strong><br />

organized by one of Liu’s sons Liu Yuan. Photos were taken with Wang<br />

Guangmei sitting between <strong>Mao</strong>’s two daughters Li Na <strong>and</strong> Li Min.<br />

There are numerous o<strong>the</strong>r cases that show that <strong>Mao</strong> was not like<br />

Stalin or Hitler. When <strong>Mao</strong> was told of Lin Biao’s fleeing in a plane, he<br />

is reported to have ordered that <strong>the</strong> plane should not be shot, saying<br />

tian yao xiayu, niang yao jiaren, rang ta qu ba (you cannot stop it if it rains,<br />

you cannot stop it if your mo<strong>the</strong>r wants to remarry; let him go). The<br />

story of Deng Xiaoping is well known: though humiliated <strong>and</strong> criticized<br />

Deng was never physically harmed. During <strong>the</strong> most turbulent<br />

days of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Revolution</strong> in <strong>the</strong> second half of 1966, when<br />

everyone of <strong>the</strong> CCP hierarchy was under attack except <strong>Mao</strong> <strong>and</strong> Lin<br />

Biao, <strong>Mao</strong> was determined to protect Zhu De <strong>and</strong> Chen Yi (Wang Li<br />

2001: 714), <strong>the</strong> two people who were very critical of <strong>Mao</strong> in <strong>the</strong> 1930s<br />

<strong>and</strong>, with Zhou Enlai, Zhu <strong>and</strong> Chen, were in fact responsible <strong>for</strong><br />

removing <strong>Mao</strong> from <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>and</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Red Army.<br />

There is ano<strong>the</strong>r example that shows that <strong>Mao</strong> judged people on<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir ideas. During <strong>the</strong> Great Leap Forward year of 1958, <strong>the</strong> Mayor of<br />

Shanghai, Ke Qingshi, was known to follow <strong>Mao</strong>’s ideas closely <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Mao</strong> <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e wanted to promote him to <strong>the</strong> powerful Politburo. But<br />

Liu Shaoqi opposed Ke’s promotion, on <strong>the</strong> basis that Ke had objected<br />

to Liu’s push in <strong>the</strong> 1940s <strong>for</strong> everyone to take <strong>Mao</strong> as <strong>the</strong> central leader<br />

of <strong>the</strong> CCP. <strong>Mao</strong> <strong>the</strong>n asked Ke to talk to Liu <strong>and</strong> persuade him to<br />

<strong>for</strong>get about that incident (Wang Li 2001: 755).<br />

Fairy tale <strong>and</strong> how scholarship changes<br />

It is incredible how unreflecting <strong>and</strong> how shameless modern show<br />

business can be. As Heartfield (2005) points out, it was Chang, in Wild<br />

Swans, <strong>the</strong> best-ever-selling family memoirs, who tells us that Chiang<br />

Kai-shek had adopted a policy of non-resistance in <strong>the</strong> face of <strong>the</strong><br />

Japanese seizure of Manchuria <strong>and</strong> Japan’s increasing encroachments<br />

on China proper. Chang also claims that it was Chiang who, instead of<br />

mobilizing <strong>for</strong>ces to fight <strong>the</strong> Japanese invasion, had concentrated on<br />

trying to annihilate <strong>the</strong> Communists. But in many instances, The<br />

[ 78 ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!