Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DEBATING THE CULTURAL REVOLUTION<br />
which regularly publishes documents <strong>and</strong> writings on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cultural</strong><br />
<strong>Revolution</strong>, featured a partial list of well-known people who died<br />
during <strong>the</strong> so-called <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Revolution</strong>ary period of 1966–76. The<br />
author asserts that all of <strong>the</strong> people on his list died as a result of persecution<br />
during <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Revolution</strong> (Dai Huang 2002). Along with<br />
such names as Liu Shaoqi, <strong>the</strong>re were also Zhu De, <strong>the</strong> legendary Red<br />
Army comm<strong>and</strong>er, <strong>and</strong> Xu Guangping, widow of Lu Xun, who had<br />
been hailed as a cultural icon by <strong>Mao</strong> <strong>and</strong> his followers. There is no<br />
evidence that ei<strong>the</strong>r Zhu De or Xu Guangping was persecuted at that<br />
time. But <strong>the</strong> widely accepted assumption is that because <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cultural</strong><br />
<strong>Revolution</strong> was a ten-year catastrophe any well-known personality<br />
who died during <strong>the</strong> period must have died from persecution.<br />
Violence, brutality <strong>and</strong> causes<br />
Certainly <strong>the</strong>re was violence, cruelty <strong>and</strong> destruction, but how should<br />
we interpret what happened during that period? Were all <strong>the</strong> acts of<br />
violence organized <strong>and</strong> intended by official policies, as was <strong>the</strong> case<br />
during <strong>the</strong> Nazi Holocaust? Was <strong>the</strong>re a plan to physically exterminate<br />
a group of people, as in Hitler’s gas chambers? The violence, cruelty,<br />
suffering <strong>and</strong> deaths that occurred during <strong>the</strong> initial years of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Revolution</strong> were caused by different groups of people, <strong>for</strong><br />
different reasons. Some conflicts were of a class nature, o<strong>the</strong>rs were<br />
social in character; some of <strong>the</strong> violence involved personal grudges, in<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r cases <strong>the</strong> violence was due to blindness, ignorance <strong>and</strong> stupidity.<br />
The fact that <strong>the</strong>re was no planned policy <strong>for</strong> violence can be seen<br />
in <strong>the</strong> sequence of events in those years. Recognizing <strong>the</strong> terrible<br />
consequences of <strong>the</strong> ‘Red Terror’ in 1966 – when in Beijing homes<br />
were raided, people judged to be class enemies were beaten up, <strong>and</strong><br />
detention centres were set up – <strong>and</strong> determined to stop fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
terror of this kind, <strong>the</strong> central committee of <strong>the</strong> CCP approved a<br />
decree drafted by <strong>the</strong> CCP of <strong>the</strong> Beijing Municipality <strong>and</strong> issued it<br />
to <strong>the</strong> whole of China on 20 November 1966. The zhongyao tonggao<br />
(important notification) decreed that no factory, mine, school,<br />
administration or any o<strong>the</strong>r unit should be allowed to establish a<br />
detention house or makeshift court to persecute anyone. Any violation<br />
of <strong>the</strong> decree would be a violation of <strong>the</strong> law of <strong>the</strong> state <strong>and</strong> of<br />
disciplines of <strong>the</strong> CCP <strong>and</strong> would be punished accordingly (Xiao<br />
Xidong 2002). It is true that documents like this did not stop <strong>the</strong><br />
violence completely; it is also true that verbal provocations, gestures<br />
<strong>and</strong> instructions by <strong>Mao</strong> <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r leaders incited a new type of<br />
violence in early 1967 <strong>and</strong> at later times. Yet <strong>the</strong> official policy was<br />
clear: yao wendou bu yao wudou (engage in <strong>the</strong> struggle with words<br />
but not with physical attack). This policy was recorded in an official<br />
[ 17 ]