Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHALLENGING THE HEGEMONY I<br />
particularly controversial about it. Except <strong>for</strong> one single reference to<br />
bourgeois fanaticism, Peng’s letter was not even as sharply critical of <strong>the</strong><br />
Great Leap Forward as <strong>the</strong> conference resolution that <strong>the</strong> three of <strong>the</strong>m<br />
had been instructed to draft. After a private conversation with <strong>Mao</strong>, Tian<br />
Jiaying was convinced that <strong>Mao</strong> was <strong>for</strong>ced to agree to criticize Peng by<br />
<strong>the</strong> argument that if nothing was done <strong>the</strong> revolutionary left might as<br />
well be disb<strong>and</strong>ed (zuopai jiu yao sanhuo le).<br />
Zhang Hengzhi (2007) goes even fur<strong>the</strong>r. He argues that it was Liu<br />
Shaoqi <strong>and</strong> his lieutenants who encouraged <strong>the</strong> Great Leap radicalism<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>Mao</strong> was <strong>the</strong> cautious one. But <strong>Mao</strong> was ready to shoulder <strong>the</strong><br />
responsibility when <strong>the</strong> mistakes became obvious since <strong>Mao</strong> he not<br />
want to damp <strong>the</strong> revolutionary spirit of <strong>the</strong> radicals. Zhang fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
argues, by quoting Liu Shaoqi, that Peng’s letter was directed at Liu.<br />
The fight between Liu <strong>and</strong> Peng left <strong>Mao</strong> with little choice: Liu had<br />
only recently been made <strong>Mao</strong>’s official successor, <strong>and</strong> if he sided with<br />
Peng <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> CCP would split. It was Liu who wanted to get rid of<br />
Peng <strong>and</strong> it was Liu who said in 1961 that anyone could be rehabilitated<br />
except Peng. It was Liu who said that Peng, like Wei Yan, 8 had a<br />
treacherous bone (fan gu), that he had <strong>the</strong> character of Zhukov (<strong>the</strong><br />
Russian general whose role was crucial in Khrushchev’s coup) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
hypocritical style of Feng Yuxiang. 9 <strong>Mao</strong> was drawn into <strong>the</strong> Peng<br />
affair reluctantly <strong>and</strong> that was why <strong>Mao</strong> said on 24 October 1966 that<br />
Deng Xiaoping had never come to seek advice from him since 1959,<br />
<strong>and</strong> that he was not happy with <strong>the</strong> August 1959 Lushan Conference<br />
because <strong>the</strong> outcome was pushed through entirely by Liu <strong>and</strong> Deng<br />
<strong>and</strong> he was given no choice.<br />
According to Zhong Yanlin (2006), Deng Xiaoping was at least<br />
initially very enthusiastic in promoting <strong>the</strong> Great Leap Forward. For<br />
instance when <strong>the</strong> leadership inside Henan Province was split on <strong>the</strong><br />
speed of economic development at <strong>the</strong> beginning of Great Leap<br />
Forward, Deng Xiaoping, as <strong>the</strong> General Secretary of <strong>the</strong> CCP,<br />
supported <strong>the</strong> radical Wu Zhipu, <strong>the</strong> party boss of Henan, by saying<br />
that Wu was on <strong>the</strong> side of truth (Xu Ming 1998). Deng also protected<br />
Li Jingquan, <strong>the</strong> party boss of Sichuan province (Zhang Suhua 2006),<br />
from any punishment when <strong>the</strong> Great Leap Forward disaster was<br />
revealed. Henan <strong>and</strong> Sichuan were two of <strong>the</strong> three provinces worst hit<br />
by <strong>the</strong> famine. As Zhang Suhua (2006) points out, Deng headed <strong>the</strong><br />
office of <strong>the</strong> General Secretariat of <strong>the</strong> CCP that had carried out <strong>the</strong><br />
day-to-day instructions of <strong>the</strong> CCP <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e was directly in charge<br />
of putting <strong>the</strong> Great Leap Forward policies into practice. There<strong>for</strong>e<br />
what Deng believed <strong>and</strong> wanted to be done must have made great<br />
differences. For instance on 5 September 1958, Deng’s office issued a<br />
telephone conference decree instructing every level of party authorities<br />
to meet <strong>the</strong> quota targets <strong>for</strong> iron <strong>and</strong> steel production. The instruction<br />
[ 127 ]