26.02.2013 Views

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE BATTLE OF CHINA’ S HISTORY<br />

stronger. For many, China is unstable <strong>and</strong> is weaker when facing <strong>the</strong><br />

global capitalist onslaught.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>the</strong>se issues <strong>the</strong>re are three questions that need to<br />

be asked about <strong>the</strong> post-<strong>Mao</strong> re<strong>for</strong>ms. The first is to what extent material<br />

improvement in <strong>the</strong> post-<strong>Mao</strong> re<strong>for</strong>m years should be attributed to<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Mao</strong> era. The second question is who benefits most from <strong>the</strong> post-<br />

<strong>Mao</strong> economic development. The third question is what approach <strong>and</strong><br />

what kind of development is good <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> quality of human life in<br />

China, <strong>and</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r this kind of development can be sustained.<br />

Who planted <strong>the</strong> seeds of <strong>the</strong> post-<strong>Mao</strong> era?<br />

One indication of positive development is that millions of Chinese<br />

have been lifted out of absolute poverty in <strong>the</strong> past three decades. It is<br />

an undisputable fact that even <strong>the</strong> rural people at <strong>the</strong> bottom of <strong>the</strong><br />

Chinese society, rural people like those who have been described in my<br />

book Gao Village (Gao 1999a), are better fed <strong>and</strong> clo<strong>the</strong>d since <strong>the</strong> 1980s.<br />

It is an undisputable fact that even basic daily necessities such as a bar<br />

of soap were rationed during <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mao</strong> era. So why is <strong>the</strong>re abundance<br />

in <strong>the</strong> re<strong>for</strong>ms years as opposed to scarcity under <strong>Mao</strong>? The answer to<br />

this question is related to <strong>the</strong> first question raised above, that is, to<br />

what extent did <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mao</strong> era contribute to subsequent economic developments?<br />

This question has already been addressed in various <strong>for</strong>ms<br />

in previous chapters.<br />

Who benefits most from <strong>the</strong> post-<strong>Mao</strong> re<strong>for</strong>m?<br />

Regarding <strong>the</strong> second question new evidence suggests that ‘China’s<br />

poorest [have become] worse off after <strong>the</strong> boom’ (McGregor 2006).<br />

According to a recent estimate based on official Chinese data <strong>and</strong><br />

analysed by <strong>the</strong> UN:<br />

From 2001 to 2003, as China’s economy exp<strong>and</strong>ed nearly 10 per<br />

cent a year, average income <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> poorest 10 per cent of <strong>the</strong><br />

country’s households fell 2.5 per cent. Those roughly 130<br />

million Chinese earn $1 a day or less, <strong>the</strong> World Bank’s global<br />

benchmark <strong>for</strong> poverty.<br />

(Batson <strong>and</strong> Oster 2006)<br />

What development can be sustained <strong>and</strong> better <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> quality of<br />

life?<br />

In relation to <strong>the</strong> third question raised above, it is worth considering<br />

whose economic development it is <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> what purposes. China focuses<br />

[ 175 ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!