26.02.2013 Views

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

virtually impossible. Indeed, some Chinese economists endorse <strong>the</strong><br />

kind of l<strong>and</strong> confiscation that is currently taking place as China’s<br />

necessary ‘l<strong>and</strong> enclosure’, comparable with what occurred in <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

during its early stage of industrialization.<br />

Environmental destruction<br />

THE BATTLE FOR CHINA’ S PAST<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r salient characteristic of Chinese capitalism in <strong>the</strong> 1980s <strong>and</strong><br />

1990s was <strong>the</strong> almost total disregard, whe<strong>the</strong>r intentional or unintentional,<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> environment. The following is <strong>the</strong> testimonial of Pan Yu,<br />

Vice-Minister of China’s State Environment Protection Administration:<br />

This spring, <strong>the</strong> State Environmental Protection Administration<br />

produced <strong>the</strong> country’s first official estimate of GDP adjusted<br />

downward <strong>for</strong> environmental losses. According to <strong>the</strong>se calculations,<br />

it would cost $84 billion to clean up <strong>the</strong> pollution<br />

produced in 2004, or 3 per cent of GDP <strong>for</strong> that year. But more<br />

realistic estimates put environmental damage at 8–13 per cent of<br />

China’s GDP growth each year, which means that China has lost<br />

almost everything it has gained since <strong>the</strong> late 1970s due to<br />

pollution.<br />

(Pan 2006)<br />

Ordinary citizens in China nowadays cannot be sure of what is in <strong>the</strong><br />

food <strong>the</strong>y consume every day. It has been suggested that athletes at <strong>the</strong><br />

2008 Beijing Olympics may show drug positive in tests simply because<br />

of <strong>the</strong>ir consumption of antibiotics <strong>and</strong> hormone-induced food. One<br />

Chinese official suggested that all <strong>the</strong> food to be used <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Olympics<br />

should be tested on mice first, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> competitors should be asked not<br />

to eat outside <strong>the</strong> Olympic Villages (Li Yang 2006).<br />

It could be argued that environmental problems are less severe in<br />

more developed countries only because <strong>the</strong>se countries have already<br />

passed <strong>the</strong> early stage of modernity. This indeed is a position that <strong>the</strong><br />

Chinese neoliberals take, as discussed in Gao (2004) <strong>and</strong> elsewhere in<br />

this book. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, develop first <strong>and</strong> clean up later is <strong>the</strong><br />

answer. Environmental degradation takes place in o<strong>the</strong>r developing<br />

capitalist countries as well. However, what makes <strong>the</strong> Chinese case<br />

different is that state ownership of rivers, mountains, <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> is often<br />

treated as equivalent to no ownership <strong>and</strong> no responsibility. The whim<br />

of a bureaucrat in charge, or a successful bribe to <strong>the</strong> same effect, can<br />

set off a project or an event with tremendous environmental consequences.<br />

It is little wonder that most of <strong>the</strong> worst polluted cities in <strong>the</strong><br />

world are currently located in China. The water in most of China’s<br />

lakes <strong>and</strong> rivers is undrinkable because of pollution. ‘Environmental<br />

[ 188 ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!