26.02.2013 Views

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE BATTLE FOR CHINA’ S PAST<br />

did not want to admit that what he did was more than passively<br />

support <strong>Mao</strong>. Deng was <strong>the</strong> General Secretary of <strong>the</strong> CCP at that time<br />

<strong>and</strong> was not only responsible <strong>for</strong> implementing <strong>the</strong> Great Leap<br />

Forward policies but also <strong>for</strong> acting as <strong>the</strong> interface between <strong>the</strong> centre,<br />

headed by <strong>Mao</strong>, <strong>and</strong> various regional <strong>and</strong> provincial leaders who put<br />

<strong>the</strong> ideas <strong>and</strong> policies in practice. It is <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e not surprising that<br />

during <strong>the</strong> Seven Thous<strong>and</strong> Delegates meeting in Beijing in early 1962,<br />

when <strong>Mao</strong> made a public criticism of himself <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Great Leap<br />

Forward disaster, Deng defended <strong>Mao</strong> by saying that mistakes were<br />

made because his office of <strong>the</strong> General Secretariat did not follow <strong>Mao</strong>’s<br />

ideas to <strong>the</strong> spirit (Zhang Suhua 2006). Deng’s defence of <strong>Mao</strong> was so<br />

effusive that even <strong>Mao</strong> was embarrassed (Wu Lengxi 2000: 317). It is<br />

also not surprising that Deng defended his ally <strong>and</strong> friend, Li<br />

Jingquan, who was <strong>the</strong> CCP boss of <strong>the</strong> Southwest region <strong>and</strong> principal<br />

leader of Sichuan province where <strong>the</strong> famine death toll was <strong>the</strong> worst<br />

(Zhang Suhua 2006).<br />

The second sentence by Nathan quoted above is very ambiguous.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> height of <strong>the</strong> Great Leap Forward in 1958, <strong>Mao</strong>, like o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

CCP leaders, did have <strong>the</strong> illusion that peasants could produce more<br />

than <strong>the</strong>y could eat. However, by 1959 he began to be cautious. In fact,<br />

it was <strong>Mao</strong> who put a stop to some of <strong>the</strong> stupid practices of <strong>the</strong> Great<br />

Leap Forward in late 1958, as pointed out by Lin Ke et al (1995). As<br />

early as March 1958 <strong>Mao</strong> instructed <strong>the</strong> chief editor of <strong>the</strong> People’s<br />

Daily, Wu Lengxi, not to publish a report from Henan on its wish list<br />

of what could be achieved in three years. <strong>Mao</strong> said <strong>the</strong> tone must be<br />

adjusted <strong>and</strong> cold water had to be poured on those who were full of<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves (Wu Lengxi 1995: 63–4). Again <strong>and</strong> again in April, August<br />

<strong>and</strong> November 1958 <strong>Mao</strong> told Wu that <strong>the</strong> media had to be coolheaded<br />

<strong>and</strong> had to tone down publicity about unrealistic production<br />

targets, that <strong>the</strong>y should not inspire unrealistic production targets, <strong>and</strong><br />

that <strong>the</strong>ir news <strong>and</strong> reports had to be realistic, cautious <strong>and</strong> down to<br />

earth. In June 1958 <strong>Mao</strong> instructed Peng Zhen <strong>and</strong> Deng Xiaoping to<br />

make sure that <strong>the</strong> media changed <strong>the</strong>ir direction from inflated<br />

reporting to cool realism. According to Wu (1995) it was not <strong>Mao</strong> but<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r leaders who were in charge of <strong>the</strong> propag<strong>and</strong>a work who were<br />

slow to change.<br />

It is true that <strong>Mao</strong> might have acted as an emperor <strong>and</strong> his words<br />

were treated as God-given by many. However, anyone who has a rudimentary<br />

knowledge of China should know that not everything that<br />

happened in China under <strong>Mao</strong>’s rule was his own doing. It is <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e<br />

incredible <strong>for</strong> a scholar of international st<strong>and</strong>ing to make simplistic<br />

<strong>and</strong> naïve statements such as ‘He [<strong>Mao</strong>] froze <strong>the</strong> people’s st<strong>and</strong>ard of<br />

living at subsistence level in order to build a massive wasteful industrial<br />

structure’ (Nathan in Li Zhisui 1994: x). <strong>Mao</strong> is taken as a God who<br />

[ 112 ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!