Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Social stratification<br />
THE BATTLE FOR CHINA’ S PAST<br />
Regarding social stratification in <strong>the</strong> urban sector in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mao</strong> era, it is<br />
true that <strong>the</strong>re was no business <strong>and</strong> economic elite class. But <strong>the</strong>re was<br />
a political <strong>and</strong> professional elite class who had all kinds of entitlements<br />
(Yang Jiang 2003) despite <strong>Mao</strong>’s political movements aimed at <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
Since <strong>the</strong> post-<strong>Mao</strong> re<strong>for</strong>ms, however, <strong>the</strong> privilege <strong>and</strong> entitlements of<br />
<strong>the</strong> political <strong>and</strong> professional elite class have been restored <strong>and</strong> encouraged<br />
to grow. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, Deng’s policy of ‘let some get rich first’ has<br />
resulted in <strong>the</strong> creation of a business elite class.<br />
Deterioration of working conditions encouraged by <strong>the</strong> state<br />
Even today, no state-owned enterprises in China would allow <strong>the</strong> kind<br />
of penal labour disciplines <strong>and</strong> harmful working conditions that<br />
prevail in privately owned firms (Chan 2001, Weil 2006). Western<br />
companies’ hypocrisy <strong>and</strong> Chinese authorities’ complicity can be illustrated<br />
by an open letter to President Jiang Zemin, jointly written by <strong>the</strong><br />
CEOs of Phillips-Van-Heusen, Reebok, <strong>and</strong> Levi Strauss in 1999, which<br />
requested a meeting to discuss <strong>the</strong> possibility of ‘working toge<strong>the</strong>r’ to<br />
improve labour rights in China (Emerson 2000). The sincerity of this<br />
request is open to question precisely because <strong>the</strong> letter was ‘open’. It is<br />
meant to serve <strong>the</strong> purpose of presenting an image of <strong>the</strong> companies as<br />
‘caring’ to <strong>the</strong>ir Western customers. The intention of spinning is<br />
confirmed by <strong>the</strong> fact that McDonald’s in China tried to prevent<br />
workers in its franchises from <strong>for</strong>ming trade unions, <strong>the</strong> fact that ‘fastfood<br />
giants McDonald’s, Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) <strong>and</strong> Pizza Hut<br />
have been caught underpaying <strong>the</strong>ir young work<strong>for</strong>ce in China by as<br />
much as 40 per cent below <strong>the</strong> already abysmal legal minimum wage’<br />
(Kolo 2007) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> multinationals lobbied in 2007 to<br />
delete or reduce <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce of terms in favour of workers when <strong>the</strong><br />
Chinese government attempted to introduce a labour law so that<br />
workers are in some way protected by contact (Shafer 2007). 4<br />
In any case, <strong>the</strong> Chinese government showed no interest in talking<br />
to <strong>the</strong> three CEOs (Emerson 2000). In fact, <strong>the</strong> plight of <strong>the</strong> migrant<br />
workers is not what concerns <strong>the</strong> Chinese authorities. The Chinese<br />
ruling elite at every level has been competing to lure outside capital by<br />
giving preferential treatments to capital <strong>and</strong> would side with capital<br />
whenever <strong>and</strong> wherever <strong>the</strong>re is a labour dispute. Although Chinese<br />
labour law stipulates that <strong>the</strong> maximum working week should not<br />
exceed 44 hours, one case study shows that workers in factories that<br />
produce shoes <strong>for</strong> Clarks <strong>and</strong> Skechers may work as long as 81 hours<br />
a week (Zhong Dajun 2005). This, of course, is not an isolated case.<br />
Many studies have demonstrated <strong>the</strong> horrifying working conditions<br />
[ 186 ]