Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HOW A MEDICAL DOCTOR DOCTORS HISTORY<br />
even asked Zhou Enlai about <strong>Mao</strong>’s extramarital affairs. But Qi<br />
declares that in all those years he had never heard even a rumour of<br />
<strong>Mao</strong> sleeping with any women outside his marriage <strong>and</strong> that Li’s accusations<br />
about <strong>Mao</strong>’s phil<strong>and</strong>ering were lies <strong>and</strong> fabrications. Qi states<br />
that <strong>Mao</strong>’s bedroom had no locks <strong>and</strong> was never locked. The duty<br />
office of <strong>the</strong> guards, secretaries, nurses <strong>and</strong> attendants was just outside<br />
<strong>the</strong> door. The office operated on a round-<strong>the</strong>-clock basis, <strong>and</strong> was<br />
staffed 24 hours a day; ‘all activities were entered into records’ (Qi<br />
1996: 195). Qi states that <strong>Mao</strong> was very respectful to ‘female comrades’<br />
<strong>and</strong> he had never heard of any complaint of sexual harassment against<br />
<strong>Mao</strong>. He did hear such complaints against o<strong>the</strong>r powerful people on<br />
<strong>the</strong> compound. Qi (2004) continued to hold <strong>the</strong>se views in ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />
interview that took place in 2004.<br />
History as doctored by <strong>the</strong> doctor <strong>and</strong> his US mentors: a critical<br />
analysis<br />
Compared with memoirs <strong>and</strong> biographies written in China, Li gives a<br />
more sympa<strong>the</strong>tic <strong>and</strong> more believable portrayal of Jiang Qing, who<br />
was isolated, lonely, depressed <strong>and</strong> desperately wanted attention.<br />
However, Li’s assertion that Jiang Qing wanted to be a modern Wu<br />
Zetian, a powerful empress, was blatantly parroting <strong>the</strong> Chinese official<br />
propag<strong>and</strong>a <strong>and</strong> Chinese intelligentsia’s accustomed Confucian<br />
approach to history.<br />
The most surprising aspect of Li’s book is his portrayal of Wang<br />
Dongxing as underst<strong>and</strong>ing, intelligent, skilful but not at all fearful.<br />
Wang was one of <strong>the</strong> few most powerful men in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mao</strong> era <strong>and</strong><br />
carried out routine duties to implement <strong>Mao</strong>’s personal instructions. It<br />
is very hard to reconcile Li’s two portraits: on <strong>the</strong> one h<strong>and</strong> his description<br />
of a vengeful <strong>and</strong> power paranoid emperor <strong>Mao</strong> <strong>and</strong> on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
of a benign Wang Dongxing who was Director of <strong>the</strong> Central Office of<br />
<strong>the</strong> CCP <strong>and</strong> head of <strong>Mao</strong>’s bodyguards. Li claims that Wang<br />
Dongxing is his friend, but Wang none<strong>the</strong>less joined <strong>the</strong> protest against<br />
Li’s book.<br />
Li’s account of events such as <strong>Mao</strong>’s meeting with his <strong>for</strong>mer wife<br />
He Zizhen, his quarrel with Peng Dehuai at Lushan <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> dismissal<br />
of his bodyguard Han Qingyu, are claimed by Lin Ke et al (1995) to<br />
have contained errors of detail that were exactly <strong>the</strong> same as those told<br />
by Ye Yonglie. The fact that dancing parties were organized <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> top<br />
leaders <strong>and</strong> that <strong>Mao</strong> had many young women around him in his later<br />
years was no secret be<strong>for</strong>e Li’s book was published.<br />
For someone who claims to have had <strong>Mao</strong>’s confidence even in<br />
political matters, Li fails to offer any insight on many significant<br />
figures <strong>and</strong> events. For instance he gives no explanation as to why Lin<br />
[ 107 ]