26.02.2013 Views

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE BATTLE FOR CHINA’ S PAST<br />

up with any convincing response. In ano<strong>the</strong>r contribution to repudiate<br />

<strong>the</strong> Chang <strong>and</strong> Halliday claim that <strong>the</strong> famous Luding Bridge <strong>Battle</strong><br />

between <strong>the</strong> Red Army <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nationalists did not take place during<br />

<strong>the</strong> Long March, an interview with a veteran solider Tang Jinxin (2007),<br />

who is 91 years old <strong>and</strong> who describes how he participated in <strong>the</strong> fierce<br />

battle of Luding, is circulated in <strong>the</strong> e-media.<br />

Liu Shaoqi, Deng Xiaoping <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Great Leap Forward<br />

One important aspect of evaluating <strong>Mao</strong> has to do with how <strong>Mao</strong><br />

h<strong>and</strong>led Peng Dehuai’s criticism of <strong>the</strong> Great Leap Forward at <strong>the</strong><br />

Lushan Conference in 1959. The version of <strong>the</strong> event that is most<br />

widely accepted is <strong>the</strong> one offered by Li Rui, according to which <strong>Mao</strong><br />

not only took action to topple Peng but also used <strong>the</strong> opportunity to<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r implant reckless leftist policies that precipitated <strong>the</strong> famine.<br />

However, recently <strong>the</strong>re have been a number of contributions on <strong>the</strong><br />

Wuyou zhixiang (Utopia) website that try to revaluate <strong>the</strong> event. Wu<br />

Lengxi (2007) <strong>and</strong> Zhang Hengzhi (2007) have presented evidence <strong>and</strong><br />

arguments that 1) <strong>for</strong> six months be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> Lushan Conference started<br />

in 2 July 1959 <strong>Mao</strong> made continuous ef<strong>for</strong>ts to cool down <strong>the</strong> Great<br />

Leap hype, 2) <strong>the</strong> purpose of <strong>the</strong> Lushan Conference was to improve<br />

<strong>the</strong> situation, 3) initially <strong>Mao</strong> did not take too much notice of Peng’s<br />

letter of criticism <strong>and</strong> intended to conclude <strong>the</strong> conference as planned<br />

in spite of Peng’s letter, <strong>and</strong> 4) it was some o<strong>the</strong>r CCP leaders who<br />

argued <strong>and</strong> persuaded <strong>Mao</strong> to extend <strong>the</strong> conference to ‘struggle<br />

against Peng’.<br />

Yun, quoting Liu Shaoqi’s speeches, argues that it was Liu who<br />

hunted Peng down by accusing Peng of aiming to usurp power from<br />

<strong>the</strong> party. Liu specifically referred to Peng as a leading member of <strong>the</strong><br />

Gao Gang <strong>and</strong> Rao Shushi anti-party clique, an accusation with which<br />

Zhou Enlai concurred (<strong>the</strong> ‘anti-party clique’ refers to <strong>the</strong> event in 1955<br />

when <strong>the</strong> Gao Gang <strong>and</strong> Rao Shushi launched a campaign to reshuffle<br />

<strong>the</strong> CCP top leadership to replace Liu <strong>and</strong> his lieutenants). Liu also<br />

accused Peng of working with ‘<strong>for</strong>eign influence’, referring to Peng’s<br />

visits to <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union <strong>and</strong> Eastern Europe immediately be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong><br />

Lushan Conference.<br />

Wu confirms that during <strong>the</strong> Politburo meeting in Beijing on 12 to 13<br />

June 1959, <strong>Mao</strong> criticized himself <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> recklessness of <strong>the</strong> Great Leap<br />

Forward policies <strong>and</strong> admitted that Chen Yun had been right after all to<br />

be cautious. Wu recalls that <strong>Mao</strong>’s personal secretary Tian Jiaying was<br />

pleased that <strong>Mao</strong> made self-criticism <strong>and</strong> thought that it was <strong>the</strong>n up to<br />

<strong>the</strong> party secretaries of various provinces to make self-criticisms at <strong>the</strong><br />

planned Lushan Conference. When Peng’s letter was circulated, Wu<br />

Lengxi, Hu Qiaomu <strong>and</strong> Tian Jiaying all thought <strong>the</strong>re was nothing<br />

[ 126 ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!