Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE BATTLE FOR CHINA’ S PAST<br />
The socialist truth <strong>and</strong> belief value of labour law<br />
In <strong>the</strong> absence of an established legal system to protect individual<br />
rights, <strong>the</strong> socialist legacy of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mao</strong> era matters a lot even now. It is<br />
often claimed that trade unions in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mao</strong> era were not only decorative<br />
but actually ano<strong>the</strong>r organ protecting <strong>the</strong> interest of <strong>the</strong> state. This<br />
line of thinking is based on <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong> relationship<br />
between trade unions <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> state ought to be antagonistic in a<br />
communist state. This anti-communist cold war assumption fails to<br />
notice that <strong>the</strong> mode of production in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mao</strong> era was so structured<br />
that <strong>the</strong> social relationship between <strong>the</strong> workers <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> state was not<br />
meant to be antagonistic. There might be disputes <strong>and</strong> grievances in<br />
individual cases, in which case trade unions might act on behalf of <strong>the</strong><br />
workers, but in general workers <strong>and</strong> management were supposed to<br />
work toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> same goal; workers were supposed to be owners<br />
<strong>and</strong> masters of <strong>the</strong> means of production <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e supervise <strong>and</strong><br />
participate in management. It was precisely in order to streng<strong>the</strong>n this<br />
supposed social relationship that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Revolution</strong> was<br />
launched. It was <strong>for</strong> this reason that workers <strong>and</strong> masses were encouraged<br />
to participate in <strong>the</strong> ‘Four Big Freedoms’ (Da ming, da fang, da<br />
bianlun, da zibao – speaking out freely, airing views fully, holding great<br />
debates <strong>and</strong> writing big character posters) during <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Revolution</strong>.<br />
It was <strong>for</strong> this reason that <strong>the</strong> Four Big Freedoms were written<br />
into <strong>the</strong> Chinese Constitution in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mao</strong> era.<br />
When <strong>the</strong> mode of production is trans<strong>for</strong>med, that is, when <strong>the</strong><br />
means of production are no longer publicly owned <strong>and</strong> when workers<br />
are no longer supposed to be <strong>the</strong> owners of <strong>the</strong>se properties, <strong>the</strong> relationship<br />
between <strong>the</strong> trade unions <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> state <strong>the</strong>n become<br />
antagonistic. Deng saw clearly what <strong>the</strong> problems would be. So in 1980<br />
he ordered <strong>the</strong> abolition of <strong>the</strong> Four Big Freedoms. In 1982 when <strong>the</strong><br />
Chinese Constitution was amended, <strong>the</strong> clause of <strong>the</strong> Four Big Freedoms,<br />
toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> freedom to strike, was stricken out (Hu 2004).<br />
Clearly <strong>the</strong> post-<strong>Mao</strong> regime has started to axe <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mao</strong>ist legacy<br />
little by little, but <strong>the</strong>re is still substantial amount that remains intact.<br />
As has been discussed, collective ownership of l<strong>and</strong> remains intact.<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r part of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mao</strong>ist legacy that remains intact is related to<br />
labour conditions <strong>and</strong> regulations in state-owned enterprises. The<br />
truth <strong>and</strong> belief values of socialism mean that workers have <strong>the</strong> right<br />
to rest at least one day a week, <strong>the</strong> right to legal holidays, <strong>the</strong> right not<br />
to work overtime more than three hours a day or 36 hours a week in<br />
total, <strong>the</strong> right to be paid overtime rates not lower than 150 per cent of<br />
<strong>the</strong> normal rate <strong>for</strong> a working day or 200 per cent during holidays, <strong>the</strong><br />
right to be paid on time, <strong>the</strong> right to maternity leave of no less than 90<br />
days <strong>and</strong> healthy <strong>and</strong> safe work equipment. However, in private <strong>and</strong><br />
[ 196 ]