Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Whe<strong>the</strong>r it’s <strong>the</strong> news that <strong>Mao</strong> never actually marched in long<br />
stretches of <strong>the</strong> Long March but was, instead, carried in a<br />
bamboo litter he designed himself, or of <strong>the</strong> scale of his purges<br />
<strong>and</strong> executions, this is a catalogue of disclosures that overturns<br />
almost all our received wisdom. The impact will be substantial.<br />
It’s an impressive achievement.<br />
(Hutton 2005)<br />
‘Chang’s new book is actually a vast work of scholarship ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />
an emotionally-charged personal attack,’ asserts Thorpe (2005). Chang<br />
<strong>and</strong> Halliday cast new <strong>and</strong> revealing light on nearly every episode in<br />
<strong>Mao</strong>’s tumultuous life, claims Yahuda (2005), a veteran scholar of <strong>the</strong><br />
London School of Economics.<br />
Scholarship, what scholarship?<br />
Of course, anyone can make any claims about anything. What is<br />
special about <strong>Mao</strong>: The Unknown Story is that <strong>the</strong> claims are supposed<br />
to have been backed up by scholarship <strong>and</strong> painstaking research. What<br />
has impressed journalists, political commentators <strong>and</strong> some academics<br />
alike is that Jung Chang <strong>and</strong> Jon Halliday claim to have consulted<br />
something like 1,200 written sources, <strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong>m in Chinese,<br />
<strong>and</strong> to have interviewed 400 people. The book has an impressive<br />
display of 68 pages of notes. It took <strong>the</strong> husb<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> wife co-authors<br />
more than a decade to finish <strong>the</strong> book, we are told.<br />
The interviewee list<br />
THE BATTLE FOR CHINA’ S PAST<br />
Let us first start with <strong>the</strong> impressive list of people whom <strong>the</strong> authors<br />
claim to have interviewed. These include dignitaries such as András<br />
Hegedüs, a prime minister of Hungary, Prince Mikasa, bro<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong><br />
Japanese Emperor Hirohito, Eugenio Anguiano, a certain Mexican<br />
ambassador to Beijing, Frank Corner, a <strong>for</strong>eign minister of New<br />
Zeal<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Lech Walesa, <strong>for</strong>mer President of Pol<strong>and</strong>. Of course His<br />
Holiness <strong>the</strong> Dalai Lama must be included in <strong>the</strong> list. With enormous<br />
financial resource <strong>and</strong> prestige from <strong>the</strong> success of Wild Swans, Chang<br />
could interview anyone she wished. But <strong>the</strong> question is: what does<br />
Lech Walesa or a prime minister of Hungary know about <strong>Mao</strong> or<br />
China?<br />
The list of course also includes many who do or could claim to<br />
know about <strong>Mao</strong> or China, such as Joseph Needham, Steven Fitzgerald<br />
(first Australian ambassador to PRC China), <strong>Mao</strong>’s daughter Li Na,<br />
<strong>Mao</strong>’s gr<strong>and</strong>son <strong>Mao</strong> Xinyu, or Liu Shaoqi’s widow Wang Guangmei.<br />
At first sight such an extensive list might make <strong>the</strong> book appear<br />
[ 66 ]