04.04.2013 Views

DYB2011-Part-II-web

DYB2011-Part-II-web

DYB2011-Part-II-web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

C h a p t e r V<br />

Related issues, including information and outreach<br />

In our increasingly interdependent world, weapons-related technologies and<br />

materials flow more readily and easily across borders. And, in such a world, the<br />

use of such weapons anywhere jeopardizes security everywhere.<br />

Developments and trends, 2011<br />

Ban Ki-moon, United nations secretary-General 1<br />

the stalemate afflicting the United Nations disarmament machinery for more<br />

than a decade showed no sign of abatement in 2011. Both the Conference<br />

on Disarmament (CD) and the United Nations Disarmament Commission<br />

(UNDC), the negotiating and deliberative bodies of the United Nations,<br />

respectively, failed to make any headway, raising difficult questions about the<br />

way ahead.<br />

The absence of a programme of work continued to paralyse the work of<br />

the CD on a range of issues, most notably a fissile missile cut-off treaty, while<br />

the UNDC ended its three-year cycle without reaching agreement at any of its<br />

three working groups, which were mandated to deal with: recommendations<br />

related to achieving nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation; elements of a<br />

draft declaration of the 2010s as the fourth disarmament decade; and practical<br />

confidence-building measures in the field of conventional weapons.<br />

The impasse led not only to expressions of heightened frustration but<br />

also to a more intense debate about the problems besetting the disarmament<br />

machinery and what needs to be done to safeguard its future. While some<br />

delegations wanted urgent procedural changes to expedite the work of these<br />

bodies, others maintained that procedural reform would not necessarily lead<br />

to substantive progress because they believed that the crux of the problem<br />

was essentially of a political nature. Nevertheless, others felt that the time<br />

had come to seriously consider alternatives to relying wholly on the United<br />

Nations machinery to advance the global disarmament agenda.<br />

The paralysis plaguing the CD and UNDC also received the focused<br />

attention of the Secretary-General’s Advisory Board on Disarmament Matters.<br />

1 The Secretary-General’s “Remarks to the Conference on Promoting the Global<br />

Instruments of Non-proliferation and Disarmament: The United Nations and the Nuclear<br />

Challenge”, New York, 31 May 2011. Available from http://www.un.org/News/Press/<br />

docs//2011/sgsm13608.doc.htm (accessed 19 June 2012).<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!