04.04.2013 Views

DYB2011-Part-II-web

DYB2011-Part-II-web

DYB2011-Part-II-web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

United Nations Disarmament Yearbook 2011: <strong>Part</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />

306<br />

After the action on the draft resolution, France provided an explanation of its<br />

position also on behalf of the United Kingdom, whereby they did not see any direct<br />

link between the general rules that were enforced regarding environmental protection<br />

and arms control agreements.<br />

66/32. Promotion of multilateralism in the area of disarmament<br />

and non-proliferation<br />

Beginning in 2002, this resolution has been<br />

introduced on an annual basis. This year, the<br />

General Assembly again adopted the resolution<br />

and reaffirmed multilateralism as the core principle<br />

in disarmament and non-proliferation negotiations<br />

and once again called upon all Member States to<br />

renew and fulfil their individual and collective<br />

commitments to multilateral cooperation as an<br />

important means of pursuing and achieving their<br />

common disarmament and non-proliferation<br />

objectives. It also requested the Secretary-General<br />

to seek the views of Member States on the issue and to submit a report thereon to the<br />

General Assembly at its sixty-seventh session.<br />

First Committee. In a general statement, Cuba said that it aligned itself with<br />

the Non-Aligned Movement, which introduced the draft resolution. It noted that the<br />

complex international situation required tackling in unison the various problems<br />

that affected humankind. It believed that the draft resolution made an important<br />

contribution to the quest for effective lasting multilateral solutions in the area of<br />

disarmament and non-proliferation.<br />

After abstaining in the vote, Canada took the floor on behalf of Australia,<br />

Canada and New Zealand. They could not agree that multilateralism was the sole<br />

principle in negotiations on disarmament and non-proliferation, as is implied in<br />

paragraphs 1 and 2 of the draft resolution. A combination of multilateral, plurilateral,<br />

regional, bilateral and unilateral measures were needed to achieve concrete results.<br />

The matters at stake were simply too vital and the world could not afford not to make<br />

use of all the measures available to improve the international security environment.<br />

66/50. Measures to prevent terrorists from acquiring weapons of<br />

mass destruction<br />

In this annual resolution, the General<br />

Assembly called upon all Member States to<br />

support international efforts to prevent terrorists<br />

from acquiring weapons of mass destruction and<br />

in this regard urged them to strengthen national<br />

measures. It also appealed to all Member States to<br />

consider early accession to and ratification of the<br />

International Convention for the Suppression of<br />

Introduced by: Indonesia, on behalf of<br />

the States Members of the United Nations<br />

that are members of the Movement of<br />

Non-Aligned Countries (20 Oct.)<br />

GA vote: 125-5-48 (2 Dec.)<br />

1st Cttee vote: 120-4-49 (27 Oct.)<br />

For text, sponsors and voting pattern,<br />

see Yearbook, <strong>Part</strong> I, pp. 47-51.<br />

Introduced by: India (17 Oct.)<br />

GA vote: w/o vote (2 Dec.)<br />

1st Cttee vote: w/o vote (26 Oct.)<br />

For text and sponsors, see Yearbook,<br />

<strong>Part</strong> I, pp. 133-135.<br />

Acts of Nuclear Terrorism and requested the Secretary-General to compile a report<br />

on measures already taken by international organizations on issues relating to the<br />

linkage between the fight against terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!