04.04.2013 Views

DYB2011-Part-II-web

DYB2011-Part-II-web

DYB2011-Part-II-web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation<br />

Though the Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council<br />

reportedly “accepted” the invitation from the EU High Representative<br />

in a letter dated 10 May, a spokesperson in the Office of the EU High<br />

Representative stated that the response “[did] not contain anything new and<br />

does not justify a further meeting”. In the meantime, the Islamic Republic<br />

of Iran had continued to announce new developments with respect to its<br />

nuclear programme. In April, the Chief of the Atomic Energy Organization<br />

of the Islamic Republic of Iran reportedly stated that his country would build<br />

four to five new research reactors, fuelled with uranium enriched to 20 per<br />

cent U-235, in different provinces within the next few years “to produce<br />

radio-medicine and perform research”. Furthermore, a spokesperson for the<br />

Supreme National Security Council of the Islamic Republic of Iran stated that<br />

his country would have produced sufficient 20 per cent U-235 by March 2012<br />

to refuel the Tehran Research Reactor.<br />

On 9 June, the Security Council adopted resolution 1984 (2011), in<br />

which it decided to extend the mandate of the Panel of Experts established<br />

pursuant to resolution 1929 (2010) for one year. The Council requested that<br />

the Panel provide a midterm report to the 1737 Committee by 11 November<br />

and to the Council by 9 December, following discussions by the Committee. In<br />

resolution 1984 (2011), the Security Council determined that “the proliferation<br />

of weapons of mass destruction, as well as their means of delivery, continues<br />

to constitute a threat to international peace and security”.<br />

During the second half of the year, diplomatic efforts to address<br />

the nuclear issues proceeded along two separate tracks, as the EU High<br />

Representative and the Russian Federation sought the modalities to resume<br />

negotiations. At the same time, the IAEA sought increased cooperation from<br />

the Islamic Republic of Iran on resolving outstanding issues as it expressed<br />

“increasing concern” and released more detailed accounts of information it<br />

had received from Member States over a period of years.<br />

On 13 July, the Russian Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, described<br />

a proposed “step-by-step” approach29 to resolve the nuclear issue, during a<br />

press conference with the United States Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton.<br />

According to the Russian Foreign Minister, the proposal would entail a<br />

“phased and mutual process”, which would include “some kind of a roadmap,<br />

starting from the easiest questions and in the end there will be the most<br />

difficult ones that would require time. … [E]ach specific step of Iran would be<br />

followed by some reciprocal step, like freezing some sanctions and shortening<br />

the volume of sanctions”. 30 He further reported that the proposal had already<br />

29 See United States Department of State, “Remarks With Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs<br />

Sergey Lavrov After their Meeting”, 13 July 2011. Available from http://www.state.gov/<br />

secretary/rm/2011/07/168478.htm (accessed 21 May 2012).<br />

30 Ibid.<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!